解决住房研究中持续的理论困境:当代文献的系统回顾

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Laura Bates, D. Collins
{"title":"解决住房研究中持续的理论困境:当代文献的系统回顾","authors":"Laura Bates, D. Collins","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2023.2204901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The housing studies field has been critiqued since the 1980s for under-engagement with theory. In this paper, we present the findings of a systematic literature review that investigates the extent to which contemporary housing scholarship engages with theory. By reviewing all research papers published in three leading housing journals in 2019 and 2020, we identify references to theory and evaluate the extent of engagement with theory. In total, 313 papers were reviewed to assess current theoretical frontiers in housing studies. We conclude that the theory-scape of housing research is more complex and nuanced than previously depicted, with contemporary scholarship engaging meaningfully with diverse theoretical frameworks of both “general” and “housing-specific” application. Our findings illuminate how housing studies is growing not only as an interdisciplinary field, but also as a well-theorized one.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"40 1","pages":"463 - 484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the Continuing Quandary of Theory in Housing Research: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Literature\",\"authors\":\"Laura Bates, D. Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14036096.2023.2204901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The housing studies field has been critiqued since the 1980s for under-engagement with theory. In this paper, we present the findings of a systematic literature review that investigates the extent to which contemporary housing scholarship engages with theory. By reviewing all research papers published in three leading housing journals in 2019 and 2020, we identify references to theory and evaluate the extent of engagement with theory. In total, 313 papers were reviewed to assess current theoretical frontiers in housing studies. We conclude that the theory-scape of housing research is more complex and nuanced than previously depicted, with contemporary scholarship engaging meaningfully with diverse theoretical frameworks of both “general” and “housing-specific” application. Our findings illuminate how housing studies is growing not only as an interdisciplinary field, but also as a well-theorized one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Theory & Society\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"463 - 484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Theory & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2204901\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Theory & Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2204901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要自20世纪80年代以来,住房研究领域一直因缺乏理论参与而受到批评。在本文中,我们提出了一项系统的文献综述的结果,该综述调查了当代住房学术与理论的结合程度。通过回顾2019年和2020年在三家领先的住房期刊上发表的所有研究论文,我们确定了理论参考文献,并评估了与理论的接触程度。总共审查了313篇论文,以评估当前住房研究的理论前沿。我们得出的结论是,住房研究的理论景观比之前描述的更加复杂和微妙,当代学术界有意义地参与了“一般”和“住房特定”应用的不同理论框架。我们的发现阐明了住房研究如何不仅作为一个跨学科领域,而且作为一个理论完善的领域而发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing the Continuing Quandary of Theory in Housing Research: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Literature
ABSTRACT The housing studies field has been critiqued since the 1980s for under-engagement with theory. In this paper, we present the findings of a systematic literature review that investigates the extent to which contemporary housing scholarship engages with theory. By reviewing all research papers published in three leading housing journals in 2019 and 2020, we identify references to theory and evaluate the extent of engagement with theory. In total, 313 papers were reviewed to assess current theoretical frontiers in housing studies. We conclude that the theory-scape of housing research is more complex and nuanced than previously depicted, with contemporary scholarship engaging meaningfully with diverse theoretical frameworks of both “general” and “housing-specific” application. Our findings illuminate how housing studies is growing not only as an interdisciplinary field, but also as a well-theorized one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信