新桥梁的建立:种族,种族主义和歧视的社会心理学笔记

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
L. Bobo
{"title":"新桥梁的建立:种族,种族主义和歧视的社会心理学笔记","authors":"L. Bobo","doi":"10.1177/01902725231191644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twenty years ago I had the honor and challenge of editing a special issue of Social Psychology Quarterly titled ‘‘Race, Racism, and Discrimination.’’ The core ambition at that time was to spark, solicit, and highlight work that exhibited certain bridging characteristics. In particular, my hope was to publish work that, first, spanned traditionally insular either problem-focused research, singlemethod or purely methodological work, or high-level theorizing work; second, involved multiple-group, not singleor dichotomous-group, pairings; and, third, sprung from or would amplify the perspectives of those from historically marginalized groups. In hindsight, I believe the issue was reasonably successful at pressing forward on a number of these ambitions. However one judges that earlier SPQ special issue, it is clear that important developments in both social science in general and the larger societal context warrant a focus on new and innovative analyses now underway. A variety of developments have reshaped the social research landscape with regard to race, racism, and discrimination. Sociologists devote more attention to research design and data analysis approaches that advance the goal of causal inference (Gangl 2010). A variety of ‘‘big data’’ sources are transforming the complexity and fine-grained character of analyses that social scientists can now conduct (McFarland, Lewis, and Goldberg 2015). More scholars attempt to bring mixedor multimethod research approaches to their investigations (Pearce 2012). Yet, not all important social scientific trends of the past two decades are about data and analytical methods. There has been a very significant reassertion of the importance of the groundbreaking theoretical ideas and work of W. E. B. Du Bois, one of the founding luminaries of sociology (Morris 2015). Similarly, a growing number of journal outlets, in part a reflection of the increasing diversity of those scholars doing important work in this arena, are very much part of the recent change.","PeriodicalId":48201,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology Quarterly","volume":"86 1","pages":"209 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Bridges to Build: A Note on the Social Psychology of Race, Racism, and Discrimination\",\"authors\":\"L. Bobo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01902725231191644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Twenty years ago I had the honor and challenge of editing a special issue of Social Psychology Quarterly titled ‘‘Race, Racism, and Discrimination.’’ The core ambition at that time was to spark, solicit, and highlight work that exhibited certain bridging characteristics. In particular, my hope was to publish work that, first, spanned traditionally insular either problem-focused research, singlemethod or purely methodological work, or high-level theorizing work; second, involved multiple-group, not singleor dichotomous-group, pairings; and, third, sprung from or would amplify the perspectives of those from historically marginalized groups. In hindsight, I believe the issue was reasonably successful at pressing forward on a number of these ambitions. However one judges that earlier SPQ special issue, it is clear that important developments in both social science in general and the larger societal context warrant a focus on new and innovative analyses now underway. A variety of developments have reshaped the social research landscape with regard to race, racism, and discrimination. Sociologists devote more attention to research design and data analysis approaches that advance the goal of causal inference (Gangl 2010). A variety of ‘‘big data’’ sources are transforming the complexity and fine-grained character of analyses that social scientists can now conduct (McFarland, Lewis, and Goldberg 2015). More scholars attempt to bring mixedor multimethod research approaches to their investigations (Pearce 2012). Yet, not all important social scientific trends of the past two decades are about data and analytical methods. There has been a very significant reassertion of the importance of the groundbreaking theoretical ideas and work of W. E. B. Du Bois, one of the founding luminaries of sociology (Morris 2015). Similarly, a growing number of journal outlets, in part a reflection of the increasing diversity of those scholars doing important work in this arena, are very much part of the recent change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychology Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"209 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychology Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725231191644\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725231191644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20年前,我有幸编辑了《社会心理学季刊》的特刊《种族、种族主义和歧视》当时的核心抱负是激发、征集和突出表现出某些桥接特征的作品。特别是,我希望出版的作品,首先,跨越传统上孤立的、以问题为中心的研究、单一方法或纯粹方法论的工作,或高水平的理论工作;第二,涉及多组,而不是单一或二分组,配对;第三,源自或将扩大那些来自历史边缘化群体的人的观点。事后看来,我认为这个问题在推进这些雄心方面相当成功。然而,有人认为,早期的SPQ特刊,很明显,社会科学和更大的社会背景的重要发展需要关注目前正在进行的新的创新分析。各种发展重塑了种族、种族主义和歧视方面的社会研究格局。社会学家更多地关注促进因果推断目标的研究设计和数据分析方法(Gangl,2010)。各种“大数据”来源正在改变社会科学家现在可以进行的分析的复杂性和细粒度特征(McFarland,Lewis,and Goldberg,2015)。更多的学者试图将混合或多方法的研究方法引入他们的研究中(Pearce 2012)。然而,并不是过去二十年所有重要的社会科学趋势都是关于数据和分析方法的。社会学奠基人之一W·E·B·杜波依斯的开创性理论思想和工作的重要性得到了非常重要的重申(Morris 2015)。同样,越来越多的期刊在一定程度上反映了在这一领域从事重要工作的学者越来越多样化,这在很大程度上也是最近变化的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Bridges to Build: A Note on the Social Psychology of Race, Racism, and Discrimination
Twenty years ago I had the honor and challenge of editing a special issue of Social Psychology Quarterly titled ‘‘Race, Racism, and Discrimination.’’ The core ambition at that time was to spark, solicit, and highlight work that exhibited certain bridging characteristics. In particular, my hope was to publish work that, first, spanned traditionally insular either problem-focused research, singlemethod or purely methodological work, or high-level theorizing work; second, involved multiple-group, not singleor dichotomous-group, pairings; and, third, sprung from or would amplify the perspectives of those from historically marginalized groups. In hindsight, I believe the issue was reasonably successful at pressing forward on a number of these ambitions. However one judges that earlier SPQ special issue, it is clear that important developments in both social science in general and the larger societal context warrant a focus on new and innovative analyses now underway. A variety of developments have reshaped the social research landscape with regard to race, racism, and discrimination. Sociologists devote more attention to research design and data analysis approaches that advance the goal of causal inference (Gangl 2010). A variety of ‘‘big data’’ sources are transforming the complexity and fine-grained character of analyses that social scientists can now conduct (McFarland, Lewis, and Goldberg 2015). More scholars attempt to bring mixedor multimethod research approaches to their investigations (Pearce 2012). Yet, not all important social scientific trends of the past two decades are about data and analytical methods. There has been a very significant reassertion of the importance of the groundbreaking theoretical ideas and work of W. E. B. Du Bois, one of the founding luminaries of sociology (Morris 2015). Similarly, a growing number of journal outlets, in part a reflection of the increasing diversity of those scholars doing important work in this arena, are very much part of the recent change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology Quarterly
Social Psychology Quarterly PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: SPPS is a unique short reports journal in social and personality psychology. Its aim is to publish cutting-edge, short reports of single studies, or very succinct reports of multiple studies, and will be geared toward a speedy review and publication process to allow groundbreaking research to be quickly available to the field. Preferences will be given to articles that •have theoretical and practical significance •represent an advance to social psychological or personality science •will be of broad interest both within and outside of social and personality psychology •are written to be intelligible to a wide range of readers including science writers for the popular press
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信