教师纪律小组决策中的群体极化:基于学校隶属关系差异的分析

Q4 Psychology

Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.33824/PJPR.2021.36.3.19

P. Aloka

{"title":"教师纪律小组决策中的群体极化:基于学校隶属关系差异的分析","authors":"P. Aloka","doi":"10.33824/PJPR.2021.36.3.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examined group polarization in decision-making among teacher-members of disciplinary panels based on secondary school affiliations in Kenya. The pre-post with Nonequivalent Control Group design was used. A sample size comprised of 78 teacher-members of disciplinary panels in 10 secondary schools. Group polarization was measured with decision tasks from the Modified Choice Dilemma Questionnaire (Kogan & Wallach, 1964). A multivariate test was used to analyze the data. Findings indicated significant differences in group polarization in decisions among teachers on the bases of school affiliations were reported on the effect of behaviour problem regarding disciplinary tone. This finding implied that school affiliations play an important role in management of students’ behavior problems. The study recommended that schools should provide training for school disciplinary panel members before they take up their roles in student behavior management.","PeriodicalId":37796,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"335-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group Polarization in Disciplinary Panel’s Decisions Among Teachers: An Analysis of Schools’ Affiliation Differences\",\"authors\":\"P. Aloka\",\"doi\":\"10.33824/PJPR.2021.36.3.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study examined group polarization in decision-making among teacher-members of disciplinary panels based on secondary school affiliations in Kenya. The pre-post with Nonequivalent Control Group design was used. A sample size comprised of 78 teacher-members of disciplinary panels in 10 secondary schools. Group polarization was measured with decision tasks from the Modified Choice Dilemma Questionnaire (Kogan & Wallach, 1964). A multivariate test was used to analyze the data. Findings indicated significant differences in group polarization in decisions among teachers on the bases of school affiliations were reported on the effect of behaviour problem regarding disciplinary tone. This finding implied that school affiliations play an important role in management of students’ behavior problems. The study recommended that schools should provide training for school disciplinary panel members before they take up their roles in student behavior management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"335-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2021.36.3.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2021.36.3.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

这项研究考察了肯尼亚基于中学隶属关系的纪律小组教师成员在决策中的群体两极分化。采用了具有非等效对照组设计的岗前。样本包括10所中学纪律小组的78名教师。群体极化是通过修正选择困境问卷中的决策任务来测量的（Kogan&Wallach，1964）。采用多变量检验对数据进行分析。研究结果表明，在行为问题对纪律语气的影响方面，基于学校隶属关系的教师在决策中的群体两极分化存在显著差异。这一发现表明，学校隶属关系在学生行为问题的管理中发挥着重要作用。该研究建议，在学校纪律小组成员参与学生行为管理之前，学校应为他们提供培训。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Group Polarization in Disciplinary Panel’s Decisions Among Teachers: An Analysis of Schools’ Affiliation Differences

The study examined group polarization in decision-making among teacher-members of disciplinary panels based on secondary school affiliations in Kenya. The pre-post with Nonequivalent Control Group design was used. A sample size comprised of 78 teacher-members of disciplinary panels in 10 secondary schools. Group polarization was measured with decision tasks from the Modified Choice Dilemma Questionnaire (Kogan & Wallach, 1964). A multivariate test was used to analyze the data. Findings indicated significant differences in group polarization in decisions among teachers on the bases of school affiliations were reported on the effect of behaviour problem regarding disciplinary tone. This finding implied that school affiliations play an important role in management of students’ behavior problems. The study recommended that schools should provide training for school disciplinary panel members before they take up their roles in student behavior management.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research (PJPR) is published biannually by the National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Pakistan. Its first issue was published in Summer, 1986. Since then two issues, one in summer and the other in winter, have been appearing every year. The Journal provides an outlet for fully documented researches addressing educational, social, developmental, and other areas of Psychology. Preference is given to empirical articles, which deal with the application of psychological knowledge in understanding the problems of national and international importance. The Journal welcomes contributions from all corners. However, participation from the developing countries is eagerly sought in view of its under-representation in research journals published in the West. The PJPR maintains an international editorial board of Consulting Editors belonging to different countries, with expertise in a large number of areas. It employs a double-blind reviewing process i.e., the authors are not identified to reviewers and reviewers are not made known to authors. The contents of PJPR are being abstracted by the Proquest, and in PsycInfo. PJPR is included in the List of Social Sciences Journals recognized by Higher Education Commission, Pakistan.