菲利普·罗斯、米奇·萨巴斯和我都是“总是偏离主题的前奏”

Q2 Arts and Humanities
David Gooblar
{"title":"菲利普·罗斯、米奇·萨巴斯和我都是“总是偏离主题的前奏”","authors":"David Gooblar","doi":"10.5703/PHILROTHSTUD.15.1.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I spent the second half of my twenties writing a book on Philip Roth. The book, which began as my PhD dissertation, was a study of Roth’s literary career, from its beginnings in the late fifties up to the end of the twentieth century. Of course, Roth’s career did not end at the end of the twentieth century. In fact, as I wrote my study, Roth kept writing, too. When I began in late 2003, he had published twenty-five books. By the time my book came out in 2011, that number had swelled to thirty-one. My subject wouldn’t keep still. So I needed to draw lines, to limit the project’s scope in some way. The turn of the century seemed a good endpoint: both for the round number, and for the growing sense that Roth’s “American Trilogy,” which culminated with 2000’s The Human Stain, would be the defining achievement of Roth’s latecareer resurgence. I couldn’t have an open-ended study, expanding every time Roth published a new work. So, with the blessing of Kasia Boddy, my exceedingly wise PhD supervisor, I planned out a study of Roth’s fiction, beginning with Goodbye, Columbus (1959) and concluding with The Human Stain. I could always briefly touch on the twenty-first-century work in the conclusion. But even within those defined limits, I couldn’t write about everything. Forty-one years in a career as productive as Roth’s was more than a single dissertation could comprehensively cover. Writing is selection; the choices I would make about what books to cover would make a statement about their significance. In crafting the book’s focus, especially after I decided to title the book The Major Phases of Philip Roth, I was making an argument. Here are the peaks of Roth’s career, the books that make the biggest contribution to literary history, the books that are in some way representative of his entire achievement.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Invariably the prelude to missing the point\\\": Philip Roth, Mickey Sabbath, and Me\",\"authors\":\"David Gooblar\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/PHILROTHSTUD.15.1.0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I spent the second half of my twenties writing a book on Philip Roth. The book, which began as my PhD dissertation, was a study of Roth’s literary career, from its beginnings in the late fifties up to the end of the twentieth century. Of course, Roth’s career did not end at the end of the twentieth century. In fact, as I wrote my study, Roth kept writing, too. When I began in late 2003, he had published twenty-five books. By the time my book came out in 2011, that number had swelled to thirty-one. My subject wouldn’t keep still. So I needed to draw lines, to limit the project’s scope in some way. The turn of the century seemed a good endpoint: both for the round number, and for the growing sense that Roth’s “American Trilogy,” which culminated with 2000’s The Human Stain, would be the defining achievement of Roth’s latecareer resurgence. I couldn’t have an open-ended study, expanding every time Roth published a new work. So, with the blessing of Kasia Boddy, my exceedingly wise PhD supervisor, I planned out a study of Roth’s fiction, beginning with Goodbye, Columbus (1959) and concluding with The Human Stain. I could always briefly touch on the twenty-first-century work in the conclusion. But even within those defined limits, I couldn’t write about everything. Forty-one years in a career as productive as Roth’s was more than a single dissertation could comprehensively cover. Writing is selection; the choices I would make about what books to cover would make a statement about their significance. In crafting the book’s focus, especially after I decided to title the book The Major Phases of Philip Roth, I was making an argument. Here are the peaks of Roth’s career, the books that make the biggest contribution to literary history, the books that are in some way representative of his entire achievement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/PHILROTHSTUD.15.1.0053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/PHILROTHSTUD.15.1.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我二十几岁的后半生写了一本关于菲利普·罗斯的书。这本书最初是作为我的博士论文而写的,它研究了罗斯从50年代末开始到20世纪末的文学生涯。当然,罗斯的职业生涯并没有在20世纪末结束。事实上,当我写我的研究报告时,罗斯也一直在写。当我在2003年底开始时,他已经出版了25本书。到2011年我的书出版时,这个数字已经膨胀到31个。我的主题不愿安静。所以我需要画一些线,以某种方式限制项目的范围。世纪之交似乎是一个很好的终点:无论是对整数来说,还是对越来越多的人来说,罗斯的“美国三部曲”(以2000年的《人类的污点》(The Human Stain)告终)将成为罗斯职业生涯后期复兴的决定性成就的感觉来说,都是如此。我不可能有一个开放式的研究,每次罗斯发表一篇新作品就扩大研究范围。因此,在我极其聪明的博士导师卡西亚·博迪(Kasia Boddy)的祝福下,我计划研究罗斯的小说,从《再见,哥伦布》(1959)开始,到《人类的污点》(the Human Stain)结束。我总是可以在结束语中简要介绍一下21世纪的作品。但即使在这些限定的范围内,我也不能写出所有的东西。在罗斯这样富有成效的41年的职业生涯中,一篇论文是无法全面涵盖的。写作是选择;我所做的关于书的封面的选择可以说明它们的重要性。在构思这本书的重点时,尤其是在我决定把这本书命名为《菲利普·罗斯的主要阶段》之后,我提出了一个论点。以下是罗斯职业生涯的巅峰之作,这些书对文学史的贡献最大,在某种程度上代表了他的全部成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Invariably the prelude to missing the point": Philip Roth, Mickey Sabbath, and Me
I spent the second half of my twenties writing a book on Philip Roth. The book, which began as my PhD dissertation, was a study of Roth’s literary career, from its beginnings in the late fifties up to the end of the twentieth century. Of course, Roth’s career did not end at the end of the twentieth century. In fact, as I wrote my study, Roth kept writing, too. When I began in late 2003, he had published twenty-five books. By the time my book came out in 2011, that number had swelled to thirty-one. My subject wouldn’t keep still. So I needed to draw lines, to limit the project’s scope in some way. The turn of the century seemed a good endpoint: both for the round number, and for the growing sense that Roth’s “American Trilogy,” which culminated with 2000’s The Human Stain, would be the defining achievement of Roth’s latecareer resurgence. I couldn’t have an open-ended study, expanding every time Roth published a new work. So, with the blessing of Kasia Boddy, my exceedingly wise PhD supervisor, I planned out a study of Roth’s fiction, beginning with Goodbye, Columbus (1959) and concluding with The Human Stain. I could always briefly touch on the twenty-first-century work in the conclusion. But even within those defined limits, I couldn’t write about everything. Forty-one years in a career as productive as Roth’s was more than a single dissertation could comprehensively cover. Writing is selection; the choices I would make about what books to cover would make a statement about their significance. In crafting the book’s focus, especially after I decided to title the book The Major Phases of Philip Roth, I was making an argument. Here are the peaks of Roth’s career, the books that make the biggest contribution to literary history, the books that are in some way representative of his entire achievement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信