认同的人格基础:内在对话的中介作用

IF 2 3区社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES

Youth & Society Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1177/0044118X211051762

M. Puchalska‐Wasyl

{"title":"认同的人格基础:内在对话的中介作用","authors":"M. Puchalska‐Wasyl","doi":"10.1177/0044118X211051762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Circumplex of Identity Formation Modes (CIFM) is the latest approach designed to integrate the various concepts describing identity formation in the Erikson–Marcia tradition. The CIFM assumes the relationships between identity modes and personality traits. The process of identity formation emerges as a result of the interaction between dispositional traits and social demands. Presumably, it involves internal dialogs understood as juxtaposing different visions of oneself and evaluating matters from different perspectives. This paper aims to test whether internal dialogs mediate the relationships between traits and identity modes. Participants (aged 14–18; 217 men, 205 women) completed: International Personality Item Pool-Big Five Markers-50, Internal Dialogical Activity Scale-Revised, and Circumplex Identity Modes Questionnaire. It was established that self-reflective dialogs mediate the positive relationship between Intellect and Consolidation; additionally, self-reflective and defensive dialogs mediate the positive relationship between Intellect and Exploration. Moreover, defensive and disruptive dialogs mediate the negative relationships between Emotional Stability and Moratorivity, Defiance, and Diffusion.","PeriodicalId":47959,"journal":{"name":"Youth & Society","volume":"55 1","pages":"351 - 371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality Underpinnings of Identity: The Mediating Role of Internal Dialogs\",\"authors\":\"M. Puchalska‐Wasyl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0044118X211051762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Circumplex of Identity Formation Modes (CIFM) is the latest approach designed to integrate the various concepts describing identity formation in the Erikson–Marcia tradition. The CIFM assumes the relationships between identity modes and personality traits. The process of identity formation emerges as a result of the interaction between dispositional traits and social demands. Presumably, it involves internal dialogs understood as juxtaposing different visions of oneself and evaluating matters from different perspectives. This paper aims to test whether internal dialogs mediate the relationships between traits and identity modes. Participants (aged 14–18; 217 men, 205 women) completed: International Personality Item Pool-Big Five Markers-50, Internal Dialogical Activity Scale-Revised, and Circumplex Identity Modes Questionnaire. It was established that self-reflective dialogs mediate the positive relationship between Intellect and Consolidation; additionally, self-reflective and defensive dialogs mediate the positive relationship between Intellect and Exploration. Moreover, defensive and disruptive dialogs mediate the negative relationships between Emotional Stability and Moratorivity, Defiance, and Diffusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Youth & Society\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"351 - 371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Youth & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211051762\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211051762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

身份形成模式的复杂性（CIFM）是最新的方法，旨在整合埃里克森-玛西娅传统中描述身份形成的各种概念。CIFM假设身份模式与人格特征之间的关系。身份形成的过程是性格特征和社会需求相互作用的结果。据推测，它涉及到内部对话，被理解为将不同的自我愿景并置，并从不同的角度评估问题。本文旨在检验内部对话是否在特质和身份模式之间起中介作用。参与者（14-18岁；217名男性，205名女性）完成了：国际人格项目库五大标记50、内部对话活动量表修订版和复杂身份模式问卷。自我反思对话在智力与整合之间起着积极的中介作用；此外，自我反思和自我防御的对话在智力与探索之间起着积极的中介作用。此外，防御性和破坏性对话介导了情绪稳定性与沉默、反抗和扩散之间的负面关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Personality Underpinnings of Identity: The Mediating Role of Internal Dialogs

The Circumplex of Identity Formation Modes (CIFM) is the latest approach designed to integrate the various concepts describing identity formation in the Erikson–Marcia tradition. The CIFM assumes the relationships between identity modes and personality traits. The process of identity formation emerges as a result of the interaction between dispositional traits and social demands. Presumably, it involves internal dialogs understood as juxtaposing different visions of oneself and evaluating matters from different perspectives. This paper aims to test whether internal dialogs mediate the relationships between traits and identity modes. Participants (aged 14–18; 217 men, 205 women) completed: International Personality Item Pool-Big Five Markers-50, Internal Dialogical Activity Scale-Revised, and Circumplex Identity Modes Questionnaire. It was established that self-reflective dialogs mediate the positive relationship between Intellect and Consolidation; additionally, self-reflective and defensive dialogs mediate the positive relationship between Intellect and Exploration. Moreover, defensive and disruptive dialogs mediate the negative relationships between Emotional Stability and Moratorivity, Defiance, and Diffusion.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Youth & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： For thirty-five years, Youth & Society has provided educators, counsellors, researchers, and policy makers with the latest research and scholarship in this dynamic field. This valuable resource examines critical contemporary issues and presents vital, practical information for studying and working with young people today. Each quarterly issue of Youth & Society features peer-reviewed articles by distinguished scholars and practitioners from a variety of disciplines and fields, including: sociology, public health, social work, education, criminology, psychology, anthropology, human services, and political science.