干扰对团队互动的影响:一项探索性的实地研究

IF 3 3区心理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT

Small Group Research Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/10464964211073590

Sanne A. van der Meer, N. Lehmann-Willenbrock, R. Delahaij, A. Homan

{"title":"干扰对团队互动的影响:一项探索性的实地研究","authors":"Sanne A. van der Meer, N. Lehmann-Willenbrock, R. Delahaij, A. Homan","doi":"10.1177/10464964211073590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite their prevalence in daily teamwork, little is known about the influence of intrusions on teams. Therefore, the effect of intrusions on team interaction was investigated, focusing on relational communication. Three different theoretical perspectives regarding team interaction changes in response to a meeting intrusion are discussed. These perspectives were mapped onto fine-grained behavioral data from twelve teams (N = 4,627 sense units) by means of lag sequential analysis. Teams’ use of relational communication changed in several ways in response to the intrusion. While these changes fit best with one perspective (task-focused), several results also align with other perspectives.","PeriodicalId":47912,"journal":{"name":"Small Group Research","volume":"53 1","pages":"644 - 669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Intrusions on Team Interaction: An Explorative Field Study\",\"authors\":\"Sanne A. van der Meer, N. Lehmann-Willenbrock, R. Delahaij, A. Homan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10464964211073590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite their prevalence in daily teamwork, little is known about the influence of intrusions on teams. Therefore, the effect of intrusions on team interaction was investigated, focusing on relational communication. Three different theoretical perspectives regarding team interaction changes in response to a meeting intrusion are discussed. These perspectives were mapped onto fine-grained behavioral data from twelve teams (N = 4,627 sense units) by means of lag sequential analysis. Teams’ use of relational communication changed in several ways in response to the intrusion. While these changes fit best with one perspective (task-focused), several results also align with other perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Small Group Research\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"644 - 669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Small Group Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211073590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Group Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211073590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管这些行为在日常团队合作中很普遍，但人们对这些行为对团队的影响知之甚少。因此，本研究以关系沟通为研究对象，研究了干扰对团队互动的影响。讨论了三种不同的理论观点，讨论了团队互动变化对会议入侵的响应。通过滞后序列分析，将这些视角映射到来自12个团队(N = 4,627个感官单位)的细粒度行为数据上。团队对关系通信的使用在响应入侵的几个方面发生了变化。虽然这些变化最适合于一种视角(以任务为中心)，但也有一些结果与其他视角一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Influence of Intrusions on Team Interaction: An Explorative Field Study

Despite their prevalence in daily teamwork, little is known about the influence of intrusions on teams. Therefore, the effect of intrusions on team interaction was investigated, focusing on relational communication. Three different theoretical perspectives regarding team interaction changes in response to a meeting intrusion are discussed. These perspectives were mapped onto fine-grained behavioral data from twelve teams (N = 4,627 sense units) by means of lag sequential analysis. Teams’ use of relational communication changed in several ways in response to the intrusion. While these changes fit best with one perspective (task-focused), several results also align with other perspectives.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Small Group Research Multiple-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

5.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Policy: Small Group Research is an international and interdisciplinary journal presenting research, theoretical advancements, and empirically supported applications with respect to all types of small groups. Through advancing the systematic study of small groups, this journal seeks to increase communication among all who are professionally interested in group phenomena.