绿色质量——社会空间城市景观类型学的确定

IF 0.3 4区艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE

Prostor Pub Date : 2018-12-30 DOI:10.31522/P.26.2(56).4

S. Golubić, Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci

{"title":"绿色质量——社会空间城市景观类型学的确定","authors":"S. Golubić, Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci","doi":"10.31522/P.26.2(56).4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the history of limitations in use and accessibility of city landscapes. Case study analysis covers six examples of parks and\nresidential square gardens. Mutual comparison offers a new socio-spatial urban landscape typology, which precedes the selection of models of rehabilitation for city landscapes. The results show that designed landscapes are used not only to mitigate, but also to intensify\nsocio-spatial inequality.","PeriodicalId":42738,"journal":{"name":"Prostor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31522/P.26.2(56).4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greenequality - Determination of Socio-Spatial Urban Landscape Typology\",\"authors\":\"S. Golubić, Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci\",\"doi\":\"10.31522/P.26.2(56).4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the history of limitations in use and accessibility of city landscapes. Case study analysis covers six examples of parks and\\nresidential square gardens. Mutual comparison offers a new socio-spatial urban landscape typology, which precedes the selection of models of rehabilitation for city landscapes. The results show that designed landscapes are used not only to mitigate, but also to intensify\\nsocio-spatial inequality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31522/P.26.2(56).4\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31522/P.26.2(56).4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31522/P.26.2(56).4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了城市景观在使用和可及性方面的局限性历史。案例分析包括六个公园和海滨广场花园的例子。相互比较提供了一种新的社会空间城市景观类型，它先于城市景观修复模型的选择。结果表明，设计景观不仅可以缓解空间不平等，而且可以加剧空间不平等。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Greenequality - Determination of Socio-Spatial Urban Landscape Typology

This paper explores the history of limitations in use and accessibility of city landscapes. Case study analysis covers six examples of parks and residential square gardens. Mutual comparison offers a new socio-spatial urban landscape typology, which precedes the selection of models of rehabilitation for city landscapes. The results show that designed landscapes are used not only to mitigate, but also to intensify socio-spatial inequality.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Prostor ARCHITECTURE-

自引率

66.70%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal PROSTOR publishes scientific papers from all branches of architecture and urban planning as well as texts from other fields of science (art history, archaeology, ethnology, sociology, geography, civil engineering, geodesy, forestry, design...) if their content relates to architectural issues.