通过Ordre公共保留地协调人权法和国际私法:以挪威承认外国离婚条例为例

Q2 Social Sciences
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2017-03-06 DOI:10.5617/OSLAW3947
Tone Linn Wærstad
{"title":"通过Ordre公共保留地协调人权法和国际私法:以挪威承认外国离婚条例为例","authors":"Tone Linn Wærstad","doi":"10.5617/OSLAW3947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the impact of the protection against discrimination guarantee in family law cases that raise questions related to private international law. The steady incorporation of international human rights protection against gender discrimination into positive Norwegian law implies a stronger focus on human rights in legal cases in which private international law is applied. The focus of the article is on the ordre public reservation as a means of harmonising private international law rules and human rights rules. This is illustrated by assessing the interpretation of the ordre public reservation in the recognition of foreign talaq divorces in Norway. This interpretation rests on human rights law, as it has been understood and implemented in Norwegian law, in legal scholarship and by administrative authorities. The findings suggest that the one-sided focus on connection in private international law should be altered to align better with the unilateral protection against discrimination that follows from international human rights law. Accordingly, the strong focus on the result in the assessment of the ordre public reservation should be altered to capture more fully the procedural and underlying regulations informing cases of a discriminatory nature.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"51-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harmonising Human Rights Law and Private International Law through the Ordre Public Reservation: the example of the Norwegian Regulation of the Recognition of Foreign Divorces\",\"authors\":\"Tone Linn Wærstad\",\"doi\":\"10.5617/OSLAW3947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the impact of the protection against discrimination guarantee in family law cases that raise questions related to private international law. The steady incorporation of international human rights protection against gender discrimination into positive Norwegian law implies a stronger focus on human rights in legal cases in which private international law is applied. The focus of the article is on the ordre public reservation as a means of harmonising private international law rules and human rights rules. This is illustrated by assessing the interpretation of the ordre public reservation in the recognition of foreign talaq divorces in Norway. This interpretation rests on human rights law, as it has been understood and implemented in Norwegian law, in legal scholarship and by administrative authorities. The findings suggest that the one-sided focus on connection in private international law should be altered to align better with the unilateral protection against discrimination that follows from international human rights law. Accordingly, the strong focus on the result in the assessment of the ordre public reservation should be altered to capture more fully the procedural and underlying regulations informing cases of a discriminatory nature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oslo Law Review\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"51-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oslo Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5617/OSLAW3947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oslo Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/OSLAW3947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了反歧视保障在家庭法案件中的影响,这些案件提出了与国际私法有关的问题。逐步将国际人权保护反对性别歧视纳入积极的挪威法律意味着在适用国际私法的法律案件中更加注重人权。本文重点论述了公共保留秩序作为协调国际私法规则与人权规则的一种手段。这可以通过评估对挪威承认外国塔拉克离婚的秩序公共保留的解释来说明。这一解释以人权法为依据,因为挪威法律、法律学术和行政当局已经理解和执行了人权法。调查结果表明,应改变国际私法中片面关注联系的做法,以便更好地与国际人权法所遵循的针对歧视的单方面保护相一致。因此,应改变在评价公共保留秩序时对结果的强烈关注,以便更充分地反映关于歧视性质案件的程序性和基本条例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harmonising Human Rights Law and Private International Law through the Ordre Public Reservation: the example of the Norwegian Regulation of the Recognition of Foreign Divorces
This article examines the impact of the protection against discrimination guarantee in family law cases that raise questions related to private international law. The steady incorporation of international human rights protection against gender discrimination into positive Norwegian law implies a stronger focus on human rights in legal cases in which private international law is applied. The focus of the article is on the ordre public reservation as a means of harmonising private international law rules and human rights rules. This is illustrated by assessing the interpretation of the ordre public reservation in the recognition of foreign talaq divorces in Norway. This interpretation rests on human rights law, as it has been understood and implemented in Norwegian law, in legal scholarship and by administrative authorities. The findings suggest that the one-sided focus on connection in private international law should be altered to align better with the unilateral protection against discrimination that follows from international human rights law. Accordingly, the strong focus on the result in the assessment of the ordre public reservation should be altered to capture more fully the procedural and underlying regulations informing cases of a discriminatory nature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oslo Law Review
Oslo Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信