偏差容忍如何促进创新行为?认知加工的中介作用和调节焦点的调节作用

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Shengxian Yu, Shanshi Liu, Xiaoxiao Gong, Wenzhu Lu, Chang-e Liu
{"title":"偏差容忍如何促进创新行为?认知加工的中介作用和调节焦点的调节作用","authors":"Shengxian Yu, Shanshi Liu, Xiaoxiao Gong, Wenzhu Lu, Chang-e Liu","doi":"10.1108/cms-07-2022-0240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDrawing on the social information processing theory, this study aims to adopt a moderated mediation model to investigate the mediation role of cognitive crafting and the moderation role of regulatory focus in the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and employee innovative behavior.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA questionnaire study with 181 employees from a state-owned communications technology company in China was conducted through a two-wave survey, with a one-month lagged design. The model is tested through confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis and PROCESS bootstrapping program in SPSS24.0 and AMOS22.0 software.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study confirms that perceived deviance tolerance is positively related to innovative behavior, while cognitive crafting mediates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior. Furthermore, the promotion focus positively moderates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and cognitive crafting, and higher promotion focus enhances the mediating effect of cognitive crafting on the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior. The prevention focus negatively moderates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and cognitive crafting, and higher prevention focus weakens the mediating effect of cognitive crafting on the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior.\n\n\nPractical implications\nOrganizations need to establish a tolerant and inclusive management system and create a harmonious working atmosphere to provide a platform basis to inspire the innovative behavior of employees. Also, regulatory focus variables are suggested to be considered in organizational human resource management processes (e.g. recruitment and training) to improve organizational person–job fit.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe primary contribution of this study is to confirm that perceived deviance tolerance has a positive impact on innovation behavior and thereby providing a new perspective to understand the impact effect of perceived deviance tolerance. Another contribution the study explores the mechanisms and boundary conditions of perceived deviance tolerance on innovative behavior fills the theoretical gap of perceived deviance tolerance.\n","PeriodicalId":51675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Management Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does deviance tolerance enhance innovative behavior? The mediating role of cognitive crafting and the moderating role of regulatory focus\",\"authors\":\"Shengxian Yu, Shanshi Liu, Xiaoxiao Gong, Wenzhu Lu, Chang-e Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cms-07-2022-0240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nDrawing on the social information processing theory, this study aims to adopt a moderated mediation model to investigate the mediation role of cognitive crafting and the moderation role of regulatory focus in the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and employee innovative behavior.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA questionnaire study with 181 employees from a state-owned communications technology company in China was conducted through a two-wave survey, with a one-month lagged design. The model is tested through confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis and PROCESS bootstrapping program in SPSS24.0 and AMOS22.0 software.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study confirms that perceived deviance tolerance is positively related to innovative behavior, while cognitive crafting mediates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior. Furthermore, the promotion focus positively moderates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and cognitive crafting, and higher promotion focus enhances the mediating effect of cognitive crafting on the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior. The prevention focus negatively moderates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and cognitive crafting, and higher prevention focus weakens the mediating effect of cognitive crafting on the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nOrganizations need to establish a tolerant and inclusive management system and create a harmonious working atmosphere to provide a platform basis to inspire the innovative behavior of employees. Also, regulatory focus variables are suggested to be considered in organizational human resource management processes (e.g. recruitment and training) to improve organizational person–job fit.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe primary contribution of this study is to confirm that perceived deviance tolerance has a positive impact on innovation behavior and thereby providing a new perspective to understand the impact effect of perceived deviance tolerance. Another contribution the study explores the mechanisms and boundary conditions of perceived deviance tolerance on innovative behavior fills the theoretical gap of perceived deviance tolerance.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-07-2022-0240\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-07-2022-0240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的借鉴社会信息处理理论,本研究旨在采用一个适度中介模型来研究认知加工的中介作用和调节焦点在感知偏差容忍度与员工创新行为之间关系中的调节作用。设计/方法/方法通过两波调查对中国一家国有通信技术公司的181名员工进行问卷调查,滞后一个月。在SPSS24.0和AMOS2.0软件中,通过验证性因子分析、相关分析和PROCESS自举程序对模型进行了检验。研究结果本研究证实,感知偏差容忍度与创新行为呈正相关,而认知加工则介导感知偏差容忍与创新行为之间的关系。此外,提升专注度正向调节感知偏差容忍度与认知手工制作之间的关系,而更高的提升专注度增强了认知手工制作对感知偏差容忍与创新行为之间关系的中介作用。预防关注度对感知偏差容忍度与认知手工制作之间的关系具有负向调节作用,而更高的预防关注度削弱了认知手工制作对感知偏差宽容度与创新行为之间关系的中介作用。实践启示组织需要建立宽容包容的管理体系,营造和谐的工作氛围,为激励员工的创新行为提供平台基础。此外,建议在组织人力资源管理过程(如招聘和培训)中考虑监管重点变量,以提高组织人员与工作的适应性。原创性/价值本研究的主要贡献是证实感知偏差容忍度对创新行为有积极影响,从而为理解感知偏差容忍的影响效应提供了一个新的视角。本研究的另一个贡献是探索感知偏差容忍对创新行为的机制和边界条件,填补了感知偏差容忍的理论空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does deviance tolerance enhance innovative behavior? The mediating role of cognitive crafting and the moderating role of regulatory focus
Purpose Drawing on the social information processing theory, this study aims to adopt a moderated mediation model to investigate the mediation role of cognitive crafting and the moderation role of regulatory focus in the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and employee innovative behavior. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire study with 181 employees from a state-owned communications technology company in China was conducted through a two-wave survey, with a one-month lagged design. The model is tested through confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis and PROCESS bootstrapping program in SPSS24.0 and AMOS22.0 software. Findings This study confirms that perceived deviance tolerance is positively related to innovative behavior, while cognitive crafting mediates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior. Furthermore, the promotion focus positively moderates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and cognitive crafting, and higher promotion focus enhances the mediating effect of cognitive crafting on the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior. The prevention focus negatively moderates the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and cognitive crafting, and higher prevention focus weakens the mediating effect of cognitive crafting on the relationship between perceived deviance tolerance and innovative behavior. Practical implications Organizations need to establish a tolerant and inclusive management system and create a harmonious working atmosphere to provide a platform basis to inspire the innovative behavior of employees. Also, regulatory focus variables are suggested to be considered in organizational human resource management processes (e.g. recruitment and training) to improve organizational person–job fit. Originality/value The primary contribution of this study is to confirm that perceived deviance tolerance has a positive impact on innovation behavior and thereby providing a new perspective to understand the impact effect of perceived deviance tolerance. Another contribution the study explores the mechanisms and boundary conditions of perceived deviance tolerance on innovative behavior fills the theoretical gap of perceived deviance tolerance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信