腕管综合征手术前后的神经电生理评价

IF 0.5 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Debanjana Chowdhury, Sangita Sen, Tibar Banerjee
{"title":"腕管综合征手术前后的神经电生理评价","authors":"Debanjana Chowdhury, Sangita Sen, Tibar Banerjee","doi":"10.4103/injr.injr_277_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Carpal tunnel release operation (CTR) is required to alleviate the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the most common entrapment neuropathy. Methods: Thirty-two patients (39 hands) of CTS were subdivided into Group I is moderate CTS (n = 9 hands), Group II is severe CTS (n = 14 hands), and Group III is extreme CTS (n = 16 hands) and underwent conventional electrophysiological evaluation and short segment transcarpal nerve conduction studies preoperatively and 1 and 3 months after open CTR operation. Results: In the case of motor conduction parameter, distal motor latency showed statistically significant improvement after 1 month of CTR (P < 0.05) in all three groups of patients, and improvement consistently increased during 3rd month follow-up (P < 0.001). In Group III patients, preoperatively forearm motor conduction velocity (FMCV) and transcarpal motor conduction velocity (TMCV) were nonrecordable, FMCV became recordable in 6 hands, while TMCV in all 16 hands post CTR. In case sensory parameters, both distal sensory latency (DSL) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) showed significant improvement in Group I, and no improvement was noted in Group III patients. Group II (6 of 14 hands) patients showed a reappearance of DSL and SNCV at 1-month follow-up and continued a steady improvement in 3rd month after CTR. Conclusion: We found that TMCV is a more sensitive parameter in assessing improvement of median nerve function after CTR. It is possible to identify patients with a poor outcome by performing electrophysiological studies.","PeriodicalId":54167,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroelectrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome before and after surgical intervention\",\"authors\":\"Debanjana Chowdhury, Sangita Sen, Tibar Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/injr.injr_277_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Carpal tunnel release operation (CTR) is required to alleviate the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the most common entrapment neuropathy. Methods: Thirty-two patients (39 hands) of CTS were subdivided into Group I is moderate CTS (n = 9 hands), Group II is severe CTS (n = 14 hands), and Group III is extreme CTS (n = 16 hands) and underwent conventional electrophysiological evaluation and short segment transcarpal nerve conduction studies preoperatively and 1 and 3 months after open CTR operation. Results: In the case of motor conduction parameter, distal motor latency showed statistically significant improvement after 1 month of CTR (P < 0.05) in all three groups of patients, and improvement consistently increased during 3rd month follow-up (P < 0.001). In Group III patients, preoperatively forearm motor conduction velocity (FMCV) and transcarpal motor conduction velocity (TMCV) were nonrecordable, FMCV became recordable in 6 hands, while TMCV in all 16 hands post CTR. In case sensory parameters, both distal sensory latency (DSL) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) showed significant improvement in Group I, and no improvement was noted in Group III patients. Group II (6 of 14 hands) patients showed a reappearance of DSL and SNCV at 1-month follow-up and continued a steady improvement in 3rd month after CTR. Conclusion: We found that TMCV is a more sensitive parameter in assessing improvement of median nerve function after CTR. It is possible to identify patients with a poor outcome by performing electrophysiological studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/injr.injr_277_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/injr.injr_277_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腕管释放手术(Carpal tunnel release operation, CTR)是缓解腕管综合征(Carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)症状的必要手段。方法:将32例(39手)CTS患者分为中度CTS组(n = 9手)、重度CTS组(n = 14手)和重度CTS组(n = 16手),术前及术后1、3个月行常规电生理评估和短段经腕神经传导研究。结果:在运动传导参数方面,三组患者在CTR治疗1个月后远端运动潜伏期均有统计学意义的改善(P < 0.05),且在随访第3个月时改善持续增加(P < 0.001)。III组患者术前前臂运动传导速度(FMCV)和经腕运动传导速度(TMCV)不可记录,6只手FMCV可记录,而CTR后16只手TMCV均可记录。在感觉参数方面,I组远端感觉潜伏期(DSL)和感觉神经传导速度(SNCV)均有显著改善,III组无明显改善。II组(14只手中的6只)患者在1个月的随访中再次出现DSL和SNCV,并在CTR后第3个月继续稳定改善。结论:TMCV是评价CTR后正中神经功能改善的较为敏感的指标。可以通过电生理研究来鉴别预后不良的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuroelectrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome before and after surgical intervention
Background: Carpal tunnel release operation (CTR) is required to alleviate the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the most common entrapment neuropathy. Methods: Thirty-two patients (39 hands) of CTS were subdivided into Group I is moderate CTS (n = 9 hands), Group II is severe CTS (n = 14 hands), and Group III is extreme CTS (n = 16 hands) and underwent conventional electrophysiological evaluation and short segment transcarpal nerve conduction studies preoperatively and 1 and 3 months after open CTR operation. Results: In the case of motor conduction parameter, distal motor latency showed statistically significant improvement after 1 month of CTR (P < 0.05) in all three groups of patients, and improvement consistently increased during 3rd month follow-up (P < 0.001). In Group III patients, preoperatively forearm motor conduction velocity (FMCV) and transcarpal motor conduction velocity (TMCV) were nonrecordable, FMCV became recordable in 6 hands, while TMCV in all 16 hands post CTR. In case sensory parameters, both distal sensory latency (DSL) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) showed significant improvement in Group I, and no improvement was noted in Group III patients. Group II (6 of 14 hands) patients showed a reappearance of DSL and SNCV at 1-month follow-up and continued a steady improvement in 3rd month after CTR. Conclusion: We found that TMCV is a more sensitive parameter in assessing improvement of median nerve function after CTR. It is possible to identify patients with a poor outcome by performing electrophysiological studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
73
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Rheumatology (IJR, formerly, Journal of Indian Rheumatology Association) is the official, peer-reviewed publication of the Indian Rheumatology Association. The Journal is published quarterly (March, June, September, December) by Elsevier, a division of Reed-Elsevier (India) Private Limited. It is indexed in Indmed and Embase. It is circulated to all bona fide members of IRA and subscribers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信