混合参与行动综合与元人种学:评估复杂社区健康转型的创新方法

Kris M. Reed, Tara Carr, Rumana Rabbani, Caroline E. Chandler, J. Scaccia, B. Cook, P. Howard, R. Ramaswamy
{"title":"混合参与行动综合与元人种学:评估复杂社区健康转型的创新方法","authors":"Kris M. Reed, Tara Carr, Rumana Rabbani, Caroline E. Chandler, J. Scaccia, B. Cook, P. Howard, R. Ramaswamy","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-99033/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Community health improvement processes are diverse and complex, and evaluation methods to gain generalizable knowledge across community are limited by available data, and the need for deep contextual knowledge. Methods: This article describes an innovative participatory approach to evaluation of a community transformation initiative involving up to eighteen communication nationwide. The approach blends two qualitative research synthesis methods: participatory action synthesis and meta-ethnography and applies them to the pragmatic evaluation of a program in real-life settings. Results: In this article, we present the justification for and details about the evaluation process. Four cycles of synthesis and engagement resulted in development of concepts to describe community actions for transformation.Conclusion: The approach presented here will be useful to both researchers and practitioners interested in evaluating community-based health and well-being initiatives and other complex interventions conducted in complex settings.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blending Participatory Action Synthesis and Meta-ethnography: An Innovative Approach to Evaluating Complex Community Health Transformation\",\"authors\":\"Kris M. Reed, Tara Carr, Rumana Rabbani, Caroline E. Chandler, J. Scaccia, B. Cook, P. Howard, R. Ramaswamy\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-99033/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background: Community health improvement processes are diverse and complex, and evaluation methods to gain generalizable knowledge across community are limited by available data, and the need for deep contextual knowledge. Methods: This article describes an innovative participatory approach to evaluation of a community transformation initiative involving up to eighteen communication nationwide. The approach blends two qualitative research synthesis methods: participatory action synthesis and meta-ethnography and applies them to the pragmatic evaluation of a program in real-life settings. Results: In this article, we present the justification for and details about the evaluation process. Four cycles of synthesis and engagement resulted in development of concepts to describe community actions for transformation.Conclusion: The approach presented here will be useful to both researchers and practitioners interested in evaluating community-based health and well-being initiatives and other complex interventions conducted in complex settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of participatory research methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of participatory research methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-99033/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-99033/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:社区健康改善过程是多样和复杂的,获得整个社区可推广知识的评估方法受到现有数据和对深入背景知识的需求的限制。方法:本文描述了一种创新的参与式方法,用于评估一个社区转型倡议,该倡议涉及全国范围内多达18个沟通。该方法混合了两种定性研究综合方法:参与行动综合和元人种学,并将它们应用于现实生活中项目的实用评估。结果:在这篇文章中,我们提出了评估过程的理由和细节。综合和参与的四个周期产生了描述社区转型行动的概念。结论:本文提出的方法对于有兴趣评估基于社区的健康和福祉倡议以及在复杂环境中进行的其他复杂干预措施的研究人员和从业人员都是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blending Participatory Action Synthesis and Meta-ethnography: An Innovative Approach to Evaluating Complex Community Health Transformation
Background: Community health improvement processes are diverse and complex, and evaluation methods to gain generalizable knowledge across community are limited by available data, and the need for deep contextual knowledge. Methods: This article describes an innovative participatory approach to evaluation of a community transformation initiative involving up to eighteen communication nationwide. The approach blends two qualitative research synthesis methods: participatory action synthesis and meta-ethnography and applies them to the pragmatic evaluation of a program in real-life settings. Results: In this article, we present the justification for and details about the evaluation process. Four cycles of synthesis and engagement resulted in development of concepts to describe community actions for transformation.Conclusion: The approach presented here will be useful to both researchers and practitioners interested in evaluating community-based health and well-being initiatives and other complex interventions conducted in complex settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信