三灾与周楚

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Sujane Wu
{"title":"三灾与周楚","authors":"Sujane Wu","doi":"10.1080/15299104.2017.1379723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most scholars consider Zhou Chu's story of eliminating the three scourges—killing a flood-dragon and a man-eating tiger, as well as reforming himself—to be well-nigh impossible. In particular, the story of his moral transformation and his learning from someone over two decades his junior still remains a point at debate. It is not my intent in this study to argue for its truthfulness. What I argue is that the evidence presented by the historical and modern scholars on both sides has failed to provide satisfactory explanation. They have also failed to draw upon the information available through the writings of both Lu Ji and Lu Yun. Thus, we need not only to reinvestigate the source materials discussed by scholars, but also to closely analyze and draw upon the evidence implicitly shown in the poetic correspondence between Lu Ji and Lu Yun. In this study, I argue that there is simply not enough evidence to dismiss it as a myth, and that the literary works of Lu Ji and Lu Yun must be taken into serious consideration while examining the legend of Zhou Chu's self-reformation included in the Shishuo xinyu and his Jin shu biography.","PeriodicalId":41624,"journal":{"name":"Early Medieval China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15299104.2017.1379723","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Three Scourges and Zhou Chu\",\"authors\":\"Sujane Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15299104.2017.1379723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most scholars consider Zhou Chu's story of eliminating the three scourges—killing a flood-dragon and a man-eating tiger, as well as reforming himself—to be well-nigh impossible. In particular, the story of his moral transformation and his learning from someone over two decades his junior still remains a point at debate. It is not my intent in this study to argue for its truthfulness. What I argue is that the evidence presented by the historical and modern scholars on both sides has failed to provide satisfactory explanation. They have also failed to draw upon the information available through the writings of both Lu Ji and Lu Yun. Thus, we need not only to reinvestigate the source materials discussed by scholars, but also to closely analyze and draw upon the evidence implicitly shown in the poetic correspondence between Lu Ji and Lu Yun. In this study, I argue that there is simply not enough evidence to dismiss it as a myth, and that the literary works of Lu Ji and Lu Yun must be taken into serious consideration while examining the legend of Zhou Chu's self-reformation included in the Shishuo xinyu and his Jin shu biography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Medieval China\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15299104.2017.1379723\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Medieval China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299104.2017.1379723\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Medieval China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299104.2017.1379723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大多数学者认为,周处的“除恶务尽”的故事几乎是不可能的。特别是,他的道德转变以及他向比他小20多年的人学习的故事仍然是一个争论点。在这项研究中,我无意为其真实性辩护。我认为,双方历史学者和现代学者提出的证据都未能提供令人满意的解释。他们也没有从鲁和鲁的著作中获得信息。因此,我们不仅需要重新研究学者们讨论的原始材料,还需要密切分析和借鉴鲁与鲁诗歌对应关系中隐含的证据。在本研究中,我认为没有足够的证据将其视为神话,在考察《世说新语》及其《晋书传》中的周处自我改造传说时,必须认真考虑陆机和陆云的文学作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Three Scourges and Zhou Chu
Most scholars consider Zhou Chu's story of eliminating the three scourges—killing a flood-dragon and a man-eating tiger, as well as reforming himself—to be well-nigh impossible. In particular, the story of his moral transformation and his learning from someone over two decades his junior still remains a point at debate. It is not my intent in this study to argue for its truthfulness. What I argue is that the evidence presented by the historical and modern scholars on both sides has failed to provide satisfactory explanation. They have also failed to draw upon the information available through the writings of both Lu Ji and Lu Yun. Thus, we need not only to reinvestigate the source materials discussed by scholars, but also to closely analyze and draw upon the evidence implicitly shown in the poetic correspondence between Lu Ji and Lu Yun. In this study, I argue that there is simply not enough evidence to dismiss it as a myth, and that the literary works of Lu Ji and Lu Yun must be taken into serious consideration while examining the legend of Zhou Chu's self-reformation included in the Shishuo xinyu and his Jin shu biography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Medieval China
Early Medieval China ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信