多样性中的相似性:帕蒂和德马克对女性代表性的启示

George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal, Alifiulahtin Utaminingsih, A. Garner, W. Wike, T. Seitz, Fadillah Putra
{"title":"多样性中的相似性:帕蒂和德马克对女性代表性的启示","authors":"George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal, Alifiulahtin Utaminingsih, A. Garner, W. Wike, T. Seitz, Fadillah Putra","doi":"10.15294/ipsr.v6i1.22745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the focus of most research in women's politics has been on the number of legislative seats and explaining the under-representation of women and other marginalized groups, we argue that there also needs to be a greater focus on voters themselves and their attitudes about gender representation in Indonesia. We focus on three broad series of questions. First, gender differences in attitudes about women candidates precisely. Second, gender differences in policy priorities. Third, gender differences in attitudes about one specific aspect of Indonesian elections – money politics or what is sometimes referred to as \"vote-buying.\" The data are drawn from a stratified probability sample of citizens in the Demak and Pati regencies in Central Java, Indonesia. A total of 800 respondents were in the sample, including 55 percent of the sample consisted of women. The finding has some interesting implications in how to understand gender differences in Indonesian politics. Men and women both respond with the correct \"rhetoric\" view about the importance of women candidates and descriptive representation. Still, both genders shift from the \"rhetoric\" view to the \"logic\" view about policies that have a more direct impact on their own lives.","PeriodicalId":53373,"journal":{"name":"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similarity Amidst Diversity: Lessons about Women Representation from Pati and Demak\",\"authors\":\"George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal, Alifiulahtin Utaminingsih, A. Garner, W. Wike, T. Seitz, Fadillah Putra\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/ipsr.v6i1.22745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the focus of most research in women's politics has been on the number of legislative seats and explaining the under-representation of women and other marginalized groups, we argue that there also needs to be a greater focus on voters themselves and their attitudes about gender representation in Indonesia. We focus on three broad series of questions. First, gender differences in attitudes about women candidates precisely. Second, gender differences in policy priorities. Third, gender differences in attitudes about one specific aspect of Indonesian elections – money politics or what is sometimes referred to as \\\"vote-buying.\\\" The data are drawn from a stratified probability sample of citizens in the Demak and Pati regencies in Central Java, Indonesia. A total of 800 respondents were in the sample, including 55 percent of the sample consisted of women. The finding has some interesting implications in how to understand gender differences in Indonesian politics. Men and women both respond with the correct \\\"rhetoric\\\" view about the importance of women candidates and descriptive representation. Still, both genders shift from the \\\"rhetoric\\\" view to the \\\"logic\\\" view about policies that have a more direct impact on their own lives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v6i1.22745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v6i1.22745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然大多数妇女政治研究的重点都是立法席位的数量,以及解释妇女和其他边缘化群体代表性不足的原因,但我们认为,还需要更多地关注选民本身及其对印度尼西亚性别代表性的态度。我们集中讨论三大系列问题。首先,对女性候选人的态度存在性别差异。第二,政策优先事项中的性别差异。第三,对印尼选举的一个特定方面——金钱政治或有时被称为“选票购买”——态度上的性别差异。这些数据来自印度尼西亚中爪哇省德马克和帕蒂县公民的分层概率样本。样本中共有800名受访者,其中55%为女性。这一发现对如何理解印尼政治中的性别差异有一些有趣的启示。男性和女性都对女性候选人的重要性和描述性代表性持正确的“修辞”观点。尽管如此,对于对自己生活有更直接影响的政策,两性都从“修辞”观点转向了“逻辑”观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Similarity Amidst Diversity: Lessons about Women Representation from Pati and Demak
While the focus of most research in women's politics has been on the number of legislative seats and explaining the under-representation of women and other marginalized groups, we argue that there also needs to be a greater focus on voters themselves and their attitudes about gender representation in Indonesia. We focus on three broad series of questions. First, gender differences in attitudes about women candidates precisely. Second, gender differences in policy priorities. Third, gender differences in attitudes about one specific aspect of Indonesian elections – money politics or what is sometimes referred to as "vote-buying." The data are drawn from a stratified probability sample of citizens in the Demak and Pati regencies in Central Java, Indonesia. A total of 800 respondents were in the sample, including 55 percent of the sample consisted of women. The finding has some interesting implications in how to understand gender differences in Indonesian politics. Men and women both respond with the correct "rhetoric" view about the importance of women candidates and descriptive representation. Still, both genders shift from the "rhetoric" view to the "logic" view about policies that have a more direct impact on their own lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信