理论研究的清算:公共行政理论计量与写作的启发

Q1 Social Sciences

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10841806.2023.2186815

Nuri Heckler, Ryan Rouse

{"title":"理论研究的清算:公共行政理论计量与写作的启发","authors":"Nuri Heckler, Ryan Rouse","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2023.2186815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When theorizing, it is sometimes colloquially said “I reckon…” This essay attempts to reckon with theorizing by proposing a heuristic for systematically gauging rigorous and/or meaningful theoretical research with the analysis of eight factors: novelty, challenge, relevance, power, fecundity, usefulness, deliberateness, and clarity. These factors offer a manual for theorists writing theoretical research, and a loose set of considerations to begin discussions of what it is that makes invigorating theory.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"45 1","pages":"6 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reckoning with theoretical research: A heuristic for gauging and writing public administration theory\",\"authors\":\"Nuri Heckler, Ryan Rouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10841806.2023.2186815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract When theorizing, it is sometimes colloquially said “I reckon…” This essay attempts to reckon with theorizing by proposing a heuristic for systematically gauging rigorous and/or meaningful theoretical research with the analysis of eight factors: novelty, challenge, relevance, power, fecundity, usefulness, deliberateness, and clarity. These factors offer a manual for theorists writing theoretical research, and a loose set of considerations to begin discussions of what it is that makes invigorating theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"6 - 15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2023.2186815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2023.2186815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图通过提出一种启发式方法，系统地衡量严谨和/或有意义的理论研究，分析八个因素:新颖性、挑战性、相关性、权力、多产性、有用性、慎重性和清晰度，从而对理论化进行评估。这些因素为理论家撰写理论研究提供了一本手册，并提供了一套松散的考虑因素，以开始讨论是什么使理论充满活力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reckoning with theoretical research: A heuristic for gauging and writing public administration theory

Abstract When theorizing, it is sometimes colloquially said “I reckon…” This essay attempts to reckon with theorizing by proposing a heuristic for systematically gauging rigorous and/or meaningful theoretical research with the analysis of eight factors: novelty, challenge, relevance, power, fecundity, usefulness, deliberateness, and clarity. These factors offer a manual for theorists writing theoretical research, and a loose set of considerations to begin discussions of what it is that makes invigorating theory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Administrative Theory and Praxis Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量