基于判断的选择问题定位:一种启发式和偏差方法

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Collection Management Pub Date : 2022-01-25 DOI:10.1080/01462679.2022.2030840

Ze’ev Schneider

{"title":"基于判断的选择问题定位:一种启发式和偏差方法","authors":"Ze’ev Schneider","doi":"10.1080/01462679.2022.2030840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper presents an analysis of decision-making in the context of judgment-based (subjective) deselection using decision theory concepts developed by Daniel Kahneman in collaboration with others. Judgment-based deselection is considered from multiple perspectives using this approach. Situating the deselection context within loss aversion, status quo bias, and the endowment effect (products of prospect theory and behavioral economics) may explain the psychological reluctance accompanying deselection. The role of feedback as a condition for developing intuitive expertise demonstrates the limited potential for developing expertise in subjective deselection. Heuristics and biases employed in decision-making and decision fatigue may account for inconsistencies in deselection decisions.","PeriodicalId":43910,"journal":{"name":"Collection Management","volume":"47 1","pages":"316 - 335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Situating the Problematics of Judgment-Based Deselection: A Heuristics and Biases Approach\",\"authors\":\"Ze’ev Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01462679.2022.2030840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper presents an analysis of decision-making in the context of judgment-based (subjective) deselection using decision theory concepts developed by Daniel Kahneman in collaboration with others. Judgment-based deselection is considered from multiple perspectives using this approach. Situating the deselection context within loss aversion, status quo bias, and the endowment effect (products of prospect theory and behavioral economics) may explain the psychological reluctance accompanying deselection. The role of feedback as a condition for developing intuitive expertise demonstrates the limited potential for developing expertise in subjective deselection. Heuristics and biases employed in decision-making and decision fatigue may account for inconsistencies in deselection decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collection Management\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"316 - 335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collection Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2022.2030840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2022.2030840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文利用丹尼尔·卡尼曼(Daniel Kahneman)与其他人合作开发的决策理论概念，分析了基于判断(主观)取消选择的决策。使用这种方法从多个角度考虑基于判断的取消选择。将取消选择的背景置于损失厌恶、现状偏见和禀赋效应(前景理论和行为经济学的产物)中，可以解释伴随取消选择的心理不情愿。反馈作为发展直觉专业知识的条件的作用表明，在主观不选择中发展专业知识的潜力有限。在决策和决策疲劳中使用的启发式和偏见可以解释取消选择决策的不一致性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Situating the Problematics of Judgment-Based Deselection: A Heuristics and Biases Approach

Abstract This paper presents an analysis of decision-making in the context of judgment-based (subjective) deselection using decision theory concepts developed by Daniel Kahneman in collaboration with others. Judgment-based deselection is considered from multiple perspectives using this approach. Situating the deselection context within loss aversion, status quo bias, and the endowment effect (products of prospect theory and behavioral economics) may explain the psychological reluctance accompanying deselection. The role of feedback as a condition for developing intuitive expertise demonstrates the limited potential for developing expertise in subjective deselection. Heuristics and biases employed in decision-making and decision fatigue may account for inconsistencies in deselection decisions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Collection Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

44.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The management and development of library collections is constantly evolving. Collection Management is the essential refereed quarterly journal that presents practical, research-based information about building, administering, preserving, assessing, and organizing library collections. The journal offers library professionals of all types crucial guidance in the fast-changing field of collection management, including the latest developments in sharing and providing access to resources, creating digital collections, preserving both traditional and digital library resources, applying technological developments to managing collections, training and developing staff.