考察欧盟安全发展战略在解决萨赫勒地区不稳定问题方面的有效性:是否需要另一种战略?

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Norman Sempijja, Ekeminiabasi Eyita-Okon
{"title":"考察欧盟安全发展战略在解决萨赫勒地区不稳定问题方面的有效性:是否需要另一种战略?","authors":"Norman Sempijja, Ekeminiabasi Eyita-Okon","doi":"10.1080/10220461.2022.2089727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The G5 Sahel (Mauritania, Niger, Burkina Faso, Mali and Chad) was formed to counter terrorist group insurgencies within its member states. European Union involvement in this effort has revolved around enhancing political dialogue and peacebuilding strategies, but challenges persist, especially the threat of separatist movements combining forces with Islamic terrorist groups. The study explores the effectiveness of EU strategies in combatting instability in the Sahel region. This mixed-methods study uses the security-development nexus perspective conceptually, drawing qualitative data from secondary sources and quantitative data from the Fragile States Index, considering indicators for group grievances; state legitimacy; human rights and the rule of law; and security apparatus. The study hypothesises that the security situation in the G5 Sahel region is primarily a consequence of bad governance and political discrepancies within these states. It concludes that EU efforts should be directed towards enhancing long term state resilience internally, to better withstand terrorism.","PeriodicalId":44641,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","volume":"29 1","pages":"139 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the effectiveness of the EU security-development strategy in tackling instability in the Sahel: The case for an alternative strategy?\",\"authors\":\"Norman Sempijja, Ekeminiabasi Eyita-Okon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10220461.2022.2089727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The G5 Sahel (Mauritania, Niger, Burkina Faso, Mali and Chad) was formed to counter terrorist group insurgencies within its member states. European Union involvement in this effort has revolved around enhancing political dialogue and peacebuilding strategies, but challenges persist, especially the threat of separatist movements combining forces with Islamic terrorist groups. The study explores the effectiveness of EU strategies in combatting instability in the Sahel region. This mixed-methods study uses the security-development nexus perspective conceptually, drawing qualitative data from secondary sources and quantitative data from the Fragile States Index, considering indicators for group grievances; state legitimacy; human rights and the rule of law; and security apparatus. The study hypothesises that the security situation in the G5 Sahel region is primarily a consequence of bad governance and political discrepancies within these states. It concludes that EU efforts should be directed towards enhancing long term state resilience internally, to better withstand terrorism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2022.2089727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2022.2089727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

萨赫勒五国集团(毛里塔尼亚、尼日尔、布基纳法索、马里和乍得)成立的目的是打击其成员国境内的恐怖组织叛乱。欧洲联盟参与这一努力的重点是加强政治对话和建设和平战略,但挑战依然存在,特别是分离主义运动与伊斯兰恐怖组织联手的威胁。该研究探讨了欧盟战略在打击萨赫勒地区不稳定方面的有效性。这项混合方法研究在概念上使用了安全与发展关系的视角,从二级来源获取定性数据,从脆弱国家指数中获取定量数据,考虑到群体不满的指标;国家合法性;人权与法治;以及安全装置。该研究假设,萨赫勒五国集团地区的安全局势主要是这些国家内部治理不善和政治差异的结果。它的结论是,欧盟的努力应该着眼于增强国家内部的长期韧性,以更好地抵御恐怖主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the effectiveness of the EU security-development strategy in tackling instability in the Sahel: The case for an alternative strategy?
ABSTRACT The G5 Sahel (Mauritania, Niger, Burkina Faso, Mali and Chad) was formed to counter terrorist group insurgencies within its member states. European Union involvement in this effort has revolved around enhancing political dialogue and peacebuilding strategies, but challenges persist, especially the threat of separatist movements combining forces with Islamic terrorist groups. The study explores the effectiveness of EU strategies in combatting instability in the Sahel region. This mixed-methods study uses the security-development nexus perspective conceptually, drawing qualitative data from secondary sources and quantitative data from the Fragile States Index, considering indicators for group grievances; state legitimacy; human rights and the rule of law; and security apparatus. The study hypothesises that the security situation in the G5 Sahel region is primarily a consequence of bad governance and political discrepancies within these states. It concludes that EU efforts should be directed towards enhancing long term state resilience internally, to better withstand terrorism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信