Suci Miranda, Wawan Tripiawan
{"title":"Perbandingan Penentuan Waktu Baku Menggunakan Metode Time Study dan Critical Path Method (CPM)","authors":"Suci Miranda, Wawan Tripiawan","doi":"10.30656/jsmi.v3i1.1418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased technological developments encourage companies or industries to be able to increase their productivity. Increased productivity can do with improvements in each process carried out following the standard time set to complete an activity. This study aims to compare the usual time in the production process of MP YST Revo at a metal casting company using the time study method and the Critical Path Method (CPM) approach. Both methods process the same information for the duration of each recorded activity and allowance. The time study calculates the standard time of the production process by considering allowances, while the CPM uses completion time and final coefficient where the sum of the duration of each activity entering the critical path becomes completion time. Based on four observations, the average of the 30-minute allowance obtained, and the average observed time is 450.05 minutes, and the CPM gives a faster completion time of 341.4 minutes. The standard time to use CPM offers a difference of about 2 hours faster than a time study.","PeriodicalId":53057,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v3i1.1418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

技术发展的提高鼓励公司或行业能够提高生产率。提高生产率可以通过改进每个过程来实现,这些过程遵循完成活动的标准时间设置。本研究旨在利用时间研究方法和关键路径方法(CPM)对某金属铸造公司MP YST Revo的生产过程中的通常时间进行比较。这两种方法处理每项记录的活动和津贴期间的相同信息。时间研究通过考虑余量来计算生产过程的标准时间,而CPM使用完工时间和最终系数,其中每个活动进入关键路径的持续时间之和成为完工时间。根据四次观测,得到的30分钟余量的平均值,平均观测时间为450.05分钟,CPM给出的完成时间更快,为341.4分钟。使用CPM的标准时间比时间研究提供了大约2小时的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perbandingan Penentuan Waktu Baku Menggunakan Metode Time Study dan Critical Path Method (CPM)
Increased technological developments encourage companies or industries to be able to increase their productivity. Increased productivity can do with improvements in each process carried out following the standard time set to complete an activity. This study aims to compare the usual time in the production process of MP YST Revo at a metal casting company using the time study method and the Critical Path Method (CPM) approach. Both methods process the same information for the duration of each recorded activity and allowance. The time study calculates the standard time of the production process by considering allowances, while the CPM uses completion time and final coefficient where the sum of the duration of each activity entering the critical path becomes completion time. Based on four observations, the average of the 30-minute allowance obtained, and the average observed time is 450.05 minutes, and the CPM gives a faster completion time of 341.4 minutes. The standard time to use CPM offers a difference of about 2 hours faster than a time study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信