巴西信息科学期刊的知识共享许可:开放获取还是免费获取?

IF 0.1 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Enrique Muriel-Torrado, A. Pinto
{"title":"巴西信息科学期刊的知识共享许可:开放获取还是免费获取?","authors":"Enrique Muriel-Torrado, A. Pinto","doi":"10.5195/BIBLIOS.2018.424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This paper analyze the active Brazilian journals of Information Science listed in the BRAPCI database, according to their copyright and Creative Commons (CC) licenses, in order to identify the access policy, the license adopted and its availability on the web. Method. The methodology focus on descriptive and documentary features in 52 journals, of which 34 were active, during the period of 2015-2017. Results. The main results are that most journals are concentrated in the Qualis/Capes B1 listing (24%); 59% have any information about the DOAJ portal; 94% have a free access policy section; 53% of journals have CC licenses, but 18% present errors or contradictions in their licenses; within those with a CC license, 50% use Recognition - Noncommercial (by nc); 24% of the journals are protected by traditional copyright; 56% offer some CC information in the policy link section; the copyright statement appears in 79% of the journals but just 38% use this section to show information about the type of license used. Conclusions. In general terms, there is a direct relationship between open access to Information Science journals and free access. The focus of the publishers is to offer the contents without the users having to pay, excluding another important aspect: the rights assigned.","PeriodicalId":42369,"journal":{"name":"Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Licenças Creative Commons nos periódicos científicos brasileiros de Ciência da Informação: acesso aberto ou acesso grátis?\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Muriel-Torrado, A. Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/BIBLIOS.2018.424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. This paper analyze the active Brazilian journals of Information Science listed in the BRAPCI database, according to their copyright and Creative Commons (CC) licenses, in order to identify the access policy, the license adopted and its availability on the web. Method. The methodology focus on descriptive and documentary features in 52 journals, of which 34 were active, during the period of 2015-2017. Results. The main results are that most journals are concentrated in the Qualis/Capes B1 listing (24%); 59% have any information about the DOAJ portal; 94% have a free access policy section; 53% of journals have CC licenses, but 18% present errors or contradictions in their licenses; within those with a CC license, 50% use Recognition - Noncommercial (by nc); 24% of the journals are protected by traditional copyright; 56% offer some CC information in the policy link section; the copyright statement appears in 79% of the journals but just 38% use this section to show information about the type of license used. Conclusions. In general terms, there is a direct relationship between open access to Information Science journals and free access. The focus of the publishers is to offer the contents without the users having to pay, excluding another important aspect: the rights assigned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/BIBLIOS.2018.424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/BIBLIOS.2018.424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目标。本文分析了BRAPCI数据库中收录的活跃的巴西信息科学期刊,根据其版权和CC (Creative Commons)许可协议,以确定其访问策略、采用的许可协议及其在网络上的可用性。方法。该方法侧重于2015-2017年期间52种期刊的描述性和纪实特征,其中34种是活跃的。结果。主要结果是:大部分期刊集中在Qualis/Capes B1目录中(24%);59%的人有关于DOAJ门户网站的任何信息;94%有免费访问政策部分;53%的期刊拥有CC许可,但18%的期刊在许可中存在错误或矛盾;在那些使用CC许可的人中,50%使用识别-非商业(由nc);24%的期刊受传统版权保护;56%在政策链接部分提供CC信息;版权声明出现在79%的期刊中,但只有38%的期刊使用这一部分来显示所使用的许可类型的信息。结论。一般来说,信息科学期刊的开放获取与免费获取之间存在直接关系。出版商的重点是在用户不付费的情况下提供内容,这就排除了另一个重要方面:分配的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Licenças Creative Commons nos periódicos científicos brasileiros de Ciência da Informação: acesso aberto ou acesso grátis?
Objective. This paper analyze the active Brazilian journals of Information Science listed in the BRAPCI database, according to their copyright and Creative Commons (CC) licenses, in order to identify the access policy, the license adopted and its availability on the web. Method. The methodology focus on descriptive and documentary features in 52 journals, of which 34 were active, during the period of 2015-2017. Results. The main results are that most journals are concentrated in the Qualis/Capes B1 listing (24%); 59% have any information about the DOAJ portal; 94% have a free access policy section; 53% of journals have CC licenses, but 18% present errors or contradictions in their licenses; within those with a CC license, 50% use Recognition - Noncommercial (by nc); 24% of the journals are protected by traditional copyright; 56% offer some CC information in the policy link section; the copyright statement appears in 79% of the journals but just 38% use this section to show information about the type of license used. Conclusions. In general terms, there is a direct relationship between open access to Information Science journals and free access. The focus of the publishers is to offer the contents without the users having to pay, excluding another important aspect: the rights assigned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信