罗马文多兰达的狗,第四部分:大型猎犬、护卫犬和实用犬

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Deb Bennett, Robert M. TIMM
{"title":"罗马文多兰达的狗,第四部分:大型猎犬、护卫犬和实用犬","authors":"Deb Bennett, Robert M. TIMM","doi":"10.15366/archaeofauna2021.30.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this report we investigate the origin and nature of morphological diversity in domestic dogs utilizing a database of over 1,000 recent and ancient canid skulls and skeletons. Integrated skull–skeleton analysis reveals eight functional groups, giving a clear picture of the extent and kind of morphological diversity produced by dog breeders in Europe, North Africa, and western Asia beginning in the Neolithic and intensifying about 2,100 years ago during the late Iron Age and Roman Era. We report nearly complete associated remains of a large sighthound from Vindolanda, a Roman-era fort–village site in northern England. With this we compare skulls of other sighthounds, and contrast them with remains of guard dogs from Vindolanda and other archaeological sites. The shape of jaw rami, relative size of teeth and state of dental wear, and the size and proportions of postcranial elements are the best differentiators of large dog morphotypes, while most skull parameters are less useful. The central section of the basicranium in ancient sighthounds (parameter Px which measures juvenilization) is little different from wolves, whereas in some modern breeds it is noticeably longer. By contrast, many ancient guard dogs have Px shorter than in wolves and show moderate juvenilization. Gracile sighthounds appear in the archaeological record in the Neolithic, while the earliest robust guard dogs appear later, in Iron Age sites. Building on results of previous work (Bennett & Timm, 2018) we continue to find intriguing similarities between west Asian dog","PeriodicalId":44490,"journal":{"name":"ARCHAEOFAUNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"dogs of Roman Vindolanda, Part IV: Large sighthounds and guard and utility dogs\",\"authors\":\"Deb Bennett, Robert M. TIMM\",\"doi\":\"10.15366/archaeofauna2021.30.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this report we investigate the origin and nature of morphological diversity in domestic dogs utilizing a database of over 1,000 recent and ancient canid skulls and skeletons. Integrated skull–skeleton analysis reveals eight functional groups, giving a clear picture of the extent and kind of morphological diversity produced by dog breeders in Europe, North Africa, and western Asia beginning in the Neolithic and intensifying about 2,100 years ago during the late Iron Age and Roman Era. We report nearly complete associated remains of a large sighthound from Vindolanda, a Roman-era fort–village site in northern England. With this we compare skulls of other sighthounds, and contrast them with remains of guard dogs from Vindolanda and other archaeological sites. The shape of jaw rami, relative size of teeth and state of dental wear, and the size and proportions of postcranial elements are the best differentiators of large dog morphotypes, while most skull parameters are less useful. The central section of the basicranium in ancient sighthounds (parameter Px which measures juvenilization) is little different from wolves, whereas in some modern breeds it is noticeably longer. By contrast, many ancient guard dogs have Px shorter than in wolves and show moderate juvenilization. Gracile sighthounds appear in the archaeological record in the Neolithic, while the earliest robust guard dogs appear later, in Iron Age sites. Building on results of previous work (Bennett & Timm, 2018) we continue to find intriguing similarities between west Asian dog\",\"PeriodicalId\":44490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHAEOFAUNA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHAEOFAUNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15366/archaeofauna2021.30.010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHAEOFAUNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/archaeofauna2021.30.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这份报告中,我们利用1000多个近期和古代犬科动物头骨和骨骼的数据库,调查了家狗形态多样性的起源和性质。综合头骨-骨骼分析揭示了八个功能组,清楚地了解了欧洲、北非和西亚的狗饲养者从新石器时代开始产生的形态多样性的程度和种类,并在大约2100年前的铁器时代晚期和罗马时代加强。我们报告了一只大型猎犬的几乎完整的相关遗骸,它们来自英格兰北部罗马时代的堡垒村庄Vindolanda。据此,我们比较了其他猎犬的头骨,并将其与文多兰达和其他考古遗址的护卫犬遗骸进行了对比。下颌支的形状、牙齿的相对大小和牙齿磨损状态,以及颅后元素的大小和比例是大型犬形态类型的最佳区分因素,而大多数颅骨参数用处不大。古代猎犬的基部(衡量幼年程度的参数Px)与狼几乎没有什么不同,而在一些现代品种中,基部明显更长。相比之下,许多古代护卫犬的Px比狼短,并且表现出适度的年轻化。新石器时代的考古记录中出现了纤细的导盲犬,而最早强壮的护卫犬出现在铁器时代的遗址中。基于之前的研究结果(Bennett&Timm,2018),我们继续发现西亚狗之间有趣的相似之处
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
dogs of Roman Vindolanda, Part IV: Large sighthounds and guard and utility dogs
In this report we investigate the origin and nature of morphological diversity in domestic dogs utilizing a database of over 1,000 recent and ancient canid skulls and skeletons. Integrated skull–skeleton analysis reveals eight functional groups, giving a clear picture of the extent and kind of morphological diversity produced by dog breeders in Europe, North Africa, and western Asia beginning in the Neolithic and intensifying about 2,100 years ago during the late Iron Age and Roman Era. We report nearly complete associated remains of a large sighthound from Vindolanda, a Roman-era fort–village site in northern England. With this we compare skulls of other sighthounds, and contrast them with remains of guard dogs from Vindolanda and other archaeological sites. The shape of jaw rami, relative size of teeth and state of dental wear, and the size and proportions of postcranial elements are the best differentiators of large dog morphotypes, while most skull parameters are less useful. The central section of the basicranium in ancient sighthounds (parameter Px which measures juvenilization) is little different from wolves, whereas in some modern breeds it is noticeably longer. By contrast, many ancient guard dogs have Px shorter than in wolves and show moderate juvenilization. Gracile sighthounds appear in the archaeological record in the Neolithic, while the earliest robust guard dogs appear later, in Iron Age sites. Building on results of previous work (Bennett & Timm, 2018) we continue to find intriguing similarities between west Asian dog
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHAEOFAUNA
ARCHAEOFAUNA ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ARCHAEOFAUNA publica trabajos originales relacionados con cualquier aspecto del estudio de restos animales recuperados en yacimientos arqueológicos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信