真理的实证研究与真理再造计划

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
K. Reuter, G. Brun
{"title":"真理的实证研究与真理再造计划","authors":"K. Reuter, G. Brun","doi":"10.1111/papq.12370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most philosophers have largely downplayed any relevance of multiple \nmeanings of the folk concept of truth in the empirical domain. However, confusions \nabout what truth is have surged in political and everyday discourse. In order \nto resolve these confusions, we argue that we need amore accurate picture of how \nthe term‘true’ is in fact used.Our experimental studies reveal that the use of ‘true’ \nshows substantial variance within the empirical domain, indicating that ‘true’ is \nambiguous between a correspondence and a coherence reading.We then explore \nthe consequences of these results for the project of re-engineering truth.","PeriodicalId":47097,"journal":{"name":"PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/papq.12370","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Studies on\\n Truth\\n and the Project of Re‐engineering\\n Truth\",\"authors\":\"K. Reuter, G. Brun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/papq.12370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most philosophers have largely downplayed any relevance of multiple \\nmeanings of the folk concept of truth in the empirical domain. However, confusions \\nabout what truth is have surged in political and everyday discourse. In order \\nto resolve these confusions, we argue that we need amore accurate picture of how \\nthe term‘true’ is in fact used.Our experimental studies reveal that the use of ‘true’ \\nshows substantial variance within the empirical domain, indicating that ‘true’ is \\nambiguous between a correspondence and a coherence reading.We then explore \\nthe consequences of these results for the project of re-engineering truth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/papq.12370\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12370\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

大多数哲学家在很大程度上淡化了经验领域中民间真理概念的多重含义的相关性。然而,关于什么是真理的困惑在政治和日常话语中激增。为了解决这些困惑,我们认为我们需要更准确地了解“真实”一词实际上是如何使用的。我们的实验研究表明,“真实”的使用在经验领域内显示出实质性的差异,表明“真实”在对应和连贯阅读之间是模糊的。然后,我们探讨了这些结果对再造真理项目的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical Studies on Truth and the Project of Re‐engineering Truth
Most philosophers have largely downplayed any relevance of multiple meanings of the folk concept of truth in the empirical domain. However, confusions about what truth is have surged in political and everyday discourse. In order to resolve these confusions, we argue that we need amore accurate picture of how the term‘true’ is in fact used.Our experimental studies reveal that the use of ‘true’ shows substantial variance within the empirical domain, indicating that ‘true’ is ambiguous between a correspondence and a coherence reading.We then explore the consequences of these results for the project of re-engineering truth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly is a journal of general philosophy in the analytic tradition, publishing original articles from all areas of philosophy including metaphysics, epistemology, moral philosophy, political philosophy, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, aesthetics and history of philosophy. Periodically, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly publishes special editions devoted to the investigation of important topics in a particular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信