欧盟对中国的“扭曲经济”反倾销政策：法律确定性的提高还是新的法律扭曲？：一些总体观察

IF 1.1 4区社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS

Journal of World Trade Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.54648/trad2022030

H. Andersen

{"title":"欧盟对中国的“扭曲经济”反倾销政策：法律确定性的提高还是新的法律扭曲？：一些总体观察","authors":"H. Andersen","doi":"10.54648/trad2022030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017, the EU introduced the ‘distorted economy’ rules in EU antidumping law. The new rules target in particular China. The question is whether the new rules and their application by the Commission provide an improvement of legal certainty for Chinese exporters and EU importers compared to the old antidumping regime of non-market economy treatment of China. This article makes a comparison between the new and old rules and their application by the EU institutions. The article argues that the new rules slightly improve legal certainty but that new uncertainties emerge as well. For example, the context of international labour law and international environmental law raises new questions.\nantidumping, distorted economy, EU, China, WTO, legal certainty","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EU’s ‘Distorted Economy’ Antidumping Approach Towards China: Improvement of Legal Certainty or New Legal Distortions?: Some Overall Observations\",\"authors\":\"H. Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/trad2022030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2017, the EU introduced the ‘distorted economy’ rules in EU antidumping law. The new rules target in particular China. The question is whether the new rules and their application by the Commission provide an improvement of legal certainty for Chinese exporters and EU importers compared to the old antidumping regime of non-market economy treatment of China. This article makes a comparison between the new and old rules and their application by the EU institutions. The article argues that the new rules slightly improve legal certainty but that new uncertainties emerge as well. For example, the context of international labour law and international environmental law raises new questions.\\nantidumping, distorted economy, EU, China, WTO, legal certainty\",\"PeriodicalId\":46019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2022030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2022030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年，欧盟在反倾销法中引入了“扭曲经济”规则。新规定特别针对中国。问题在于，与对中国非市场经济待遇的旧反倾销制度相比，新规则及其由欧盟委员会实施，是否能提高中国出口商和欧盟进口商的法律确定性。本文对新、旧规则及其在欧盟机构中的应用进行了比较。文章认为，新规则略微提高了法律确定性，但也出现了新的不确定性。例如，国际劳工法和国际环境法的范围提出了新的问题。反倾销，扭曲的经济，欧盟，中国，WTO，法律确定性

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

EU’s ‘Distorted Economy’ Antidumping Approach Towards China: Improvement of Legal Certainty or New Legal Distortions?: Some Overall Observations

In 2017, the EU introduced the ‘distorted economy’ rules in EU antidumping law. The new rules target in particular China. The question is whether the new rules and their application by the Commission provide an improvement of legal certainty for Chinese exporters and EU importers compared to the old antidumping regime of non-market economy treatment of China. This article makes a comparison between the new and old rules and their application by the EU institutions. The article argues that the new rules slightly improve legal certainty but that new uncertainties emerge as well. For example, the context of international labour law and international environmental law raises new questions. antidumping, distorted economy, EU, China, WTO, legal certainty

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of World Trade Multiple-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.