捐赠者是否以更高的非项目成本惩罚非营利组织?捐赠者头顶厌恶的元分析

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
ChiaKo Hung, M. Hager, Yuan Tian
{"title":"捐赠者是否以更高的非项目成本惩罚非营利组织?捐赠者头顶厌恶的元分析","authors":"ChiaKo Hung, M. Hager, Yuan Tian","doi":"10.1177/08997640221138260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disparate research on overhead aversion and nonprofit starvation can benefit from a conceptual model that explains their relationships. Following resurrection of such a model, we focus on one important piece: the relationship between overhead spending and nonprofit donations. Studies on this topic have produced inconclusive results. Our meta-analysis clarifies the relationship by synthesizing a sample of 30 original studies with 244 effect sizes. We uncover a negative association suggesting that donors penalize nonprofits with higher overhead costs. Moreover, our meta-regression models reveal that experimental designs detect higher donor aversion than studies that use other research designs and that amateur donors have more intense overhead aversion than professional donors. However, studies that measure administrative costs do not report more negative effects than studies that measure both administrative and fundraising costs. The overall contribution of the meta-analysis solidifies the conceptual link between reported capacity costs and funders’ giving decisions, a key arc in the nonprofit starvation cycle.","PeriodicalId":48235,"journal":{"name":"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Donors Penalize Nonprofits With Higher Non-Program Costs? A Meta-Analysis of Donor Overhead Aversion\",\"authors\":\"ChiaKo Hung, M. Hager, Yuan Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08997640221138260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disparate research on overhead aversion and nonprofit starvation can benefit from a conceptual model that explains their relationships. Following resurrection of such a model, we focus on one important piece: the relationship between overhead spending and nonprofit donations. Studies on this topic have produced inconclusive results. Our meta-analysis clarifies the relationship by synthesizing a sample of 30 original studies with 244 effect sizes. We uncover a negative association suggesting that donors penalize nonprofits with higher overhead costs. Moreover, our meta-regression models reveal that experimental designs detect higher donor aversion than studies that use other research designs and that amateur donors have more intense overhead aversion than professional donors. However, studies that measure administrative costs do not report more negative effects than studies that measure both administrative and fundraising costs. The overall contribution of the meta-analysis solidifies the conceptual link between reported capacity costs and funders’ giving decisions, a key arc in the nonprofit starvation cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221138260\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221138260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对开销厌恶和非营利饥饿的差异研究可以从解释它们之间关系的概念模型中受益。在这种模式复活之后,我们关注一个重要部分:管理费用支出和非营利捐款之间的关系。对这一主题的研究产生了不确定的结果。我们的荟萃分析通过综合30项具有244个效应大小的原始研究样本来阐明这种关系。我们发现了一个负面关联,表明捐助者以更高的管理费用惩罚非营利组织。此外,我们的元回归模型显示,实验设计比使用其他研究设计的研究检测到更高的捐赠者厌恶,业余捐赠者比专业捐赠者有更强烈的开销厌恶。然而,衡量行政成本的研究并没有比同时衡量行政和筹资成本的研究报告更多的负面影响。荟萃分析的总体贡献巩固了报告的产能成本和资助者的捐赠决策之间的概念联系,这是非营利饥饿周期中的一个关键环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Donors Penalize Nonprofits With Higher Non-Program Costs? A Meta-Analysis of Donor Overhead Aversion
Disparate research on overhead aversion and nonprofit starvation can benefit from a conceptual model that explains their relationships. Following resurrection of such a model, we focus on one important piece: the relationship between overhead spending and nonprofit donations. Studies on this topic have produced inconclusive results. Our meta-analysis clarifies the relationship by synthesizing a sample of 30 original studies with 244 effect sizes. We uncover a negative association suggesting that donors penalize nonprofits with higher overhead costs. Moreover, our meta-regression models reveal that experimental designs detect higher donor aversion than studies that use other research designs and that amateur donors have more intense overhead aversion than professional donors. However, studies that measure administrative costs do not report more negative effects than studies that measure both administrative and fundraising costs. The overall contribution of the meta-analysis solidifies the conceptual link between reported capacity costs and funders’ giving decisions, a key arc in the nonprofit starvation cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, the journal of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, is an international, interdisciplinary journal that seeks to enhance the quality of life and general welfare of humanity through effective and appropriate voluntary action by reporting on research and programs related to voluntarism, citizen participation, philanthropy, and nonprofit organizations in societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信