伊朗医科大学师资发展现状:一项定性研究

S. Mohammaditabar, A. Abbaspour, Ali Khorsandi Taskoh
{"title":"伊朗医科大学师资发展现状:一项定性研究","authors":"S. Mohammaditabar, A. Abbaspour, Ali Khorsandi Taskoh","doi":"10.5812/erms.96301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundHigher education institutions and medical universities always need developed faculties to reach their objectives, thus they need plans for empowering the professors. Hence, it is necessary for them to seek and apply the views of the experts on development.ObjectivesThe present qualitative study aimed to analyze development of faculty members of universities of medical sciences in Iran based on different views of experts.MethodsSome experts in the field of medical educational development were selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods until reaching the theoretical saturation, and underwent semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and analyzed through qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe analysis of transcripts yielded 321 initial codes that were classified and summarized according to conceptual similarities and differences. Subthemes of research, educational, leadership and management, specialty, ethical and individual dimensions were observed for the faculty development of medical sciences universities.ConclusionsAccording to the results of the study, managers and officials are recommended to adopt a comprehensive look at the faculty development plans and consider all its aspects.","PeriodicalId":32200,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Status of Faculty Development of Medical Sciences Universities in Iran: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"S. Mohammaditabar, A. Abbaspour, Ali Khorsandi Taskoh\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/erms.96301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundHigher education institutions and medical universities always need developed faculties to reach their objectives, thus they need plans for empowering the professors. Hence, it is necessary for them to seek and apply the views of the experts on development.ObjectivesThe present qualitative study aimed to analyze development of faculty members of universities of medical sciences in Iran based on different views of experts.MethodsSome experts in the field of medical educational development were selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods until reaching the theoretical saturation, and underwent semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and analyzed through qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe analysis of transcripts yielded 321 initial codes that were classified and summarized according to conceptual similarities and differences. Subthemes of research, educational, leadership and management, specialty, ethical and individual dimensions were observed for the faculty development of medical sciences universities.ConclusionsAccording to the results of the study, managers and officials are recommended to adopt a comprehensive look at the faculty development plans and consider all its aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.96301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.96301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育机构和医科大学总是需要发达的师资力量来实现他们的目标,因此他们需要赋予教授权力的计划。因此,它们有必要寻求和应用专家对发展的看法。目的本定性研究旨在根据专家的不同观点分析伊朗医学大学教师的发展。方法采用目的抽样法和滚雪球抽样法,选取医学教育发展领域的专家进行半结构化访谈,直至达到理论饱和。对访谈进行逐字记录和转录,并通过定性内容分析进行分析。结果转录本分析得到321个初始编码,并根据概念上的异同进行分类和总结。研究、教育、领导和管理、专业、道德和个人方面是医学大学教师发展的子主题。根据研究结果,建议管理人员和官员对教师发展计划采取全面的看法,并考虑其所有方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Status of Faculty Development of Medical Sciences Universities in Iran: A Qualitative Study
BackgroundHigher education institutions and medical universities always need developed faculties to reach their objectives, thus they need plans for empowering the professors. Hence, it is necessary for them to seek and apply the views of the experts on development.ObjectivesThe present qualitative study aimed to analyze development of faculty members of universities of medical sciences in Iran based on different views of experts.MethodsSome experts in the field of medical educational development were selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods until reaching the theoretical saturation, and underwent semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and analyzed through qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe analysis of transcripts yielded 321 initial codes that were classified and summarized according to conceptual similarities and differences. Subthemes of research, educational, leadership and management, specialty, ethical and individual dimensions were observed for the faculty development of medical sciences universities.ConclusionsAccording to the results of the study, managers and officials are recommended to adopt a comprehensive look at the faculty development plans and consider all its aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信