TurkStream是俄罗斯多元化的最后一步：一种双赢的方法

IF 0.6 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Insight Turkey Pub Date : 2021-03-05 DOI:10.25253/99.2021231.13

Ramazan Erdaǧ

{"title":"TurkStream是俄罗斯多元化的最后一步：一种双赢的方法","authors":"Ramazan Erdaǧ","doi":"10.25253/99.2021231.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses why Russia replaced the South Stream project with the TurkStream by changing its route and name, and why Turkey is involved in a project on the North-South line although it plays a vital role in the Trans-Anatolia Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP) project in the southern gas corridor. The article first examines the Russia-Ukraine natural gas crisis. It then moves to analyze the reasons behind Russia’s changing of the name and the route of the South Stream project. After exploring Turkey’s involvement in the project, the article concludes by arguing that both countries adopted a win-win approach toward the project that Russia has gained a significant tariff advantage and freedom from the EU third-party-access rule. The article claims that although both Russia and Turkey have different perspectives on some issues in international politics, they can develop their cooperation with a win-win approach in the TurkStream project.","PeriodicalId":44871,"journal":{"name":"Insight Turkey","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TurkStream as Russia’s Last Step in Diversification: A Win-Win Approach\",\"authors\":\"Ramazan Erdaǧ\",\"doi\":\"10.25253/99.2021231.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses why Russia replaced the South Stream project with the TurkStream by changing its route and name, and why Turkey is involved in a project on the North-South line although it plays a vital role in the Trans-Anatolia Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP) project in the southern gas corridor. The article first examines the Russia-Ukraine natural gas crisis. It then moves to analyze the reasons behind Russia’s changing of the name and the route of the South Stream project. After exploring Turkey’s involvement in the project, the article concludes by arguing that both countries adopted a win-win approach toward the project that Russia has gained a significant tariff advantage and freedom from the EU third-party-access rule. The article claims that although both Russia and Turkey have different perspectives on some issues in international politics, they can develop their cooperation with a win-win approach in the TurkStream project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insight Turkey\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insight Turkey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2021231.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight Turkey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2021231.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文讨论了为什么俄罗斯通过改变其路线和名称以TurkStream取代南溪项目，以及为什么土耳其参与南北线项目，尽管它在南部天然气走廊的跨安纳托利亚天然气管道(TANAP)项目中发挥着至关重要的作用。本文首先考察了俄乌天然气危机。然后分析了俄罗斯改变名称和南溪项目路线背后的原因。在探讨了土耳其参与该项目后，文章的结论是，两国对该项目采取了双赢的方式，俄罗斯获得了显著的关税优势，并且不受欧盟第三方准入规则的限制。文章称，尽管俄罗斯和土耳其在国际政治的一些问题上有不同的观点，但他们可以在TurkStream项目中以双赢的方式发展合作。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

TurkStream as Russia’s Last Step in Diversification: A Win-Win Approach

This article discusses why Russia replaced the South Stream project with the TurkStream by changing its route and name, and why Turkey is involved in a project on the North-South line although it plays a vital role in the Trans-Anatolia Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP) project in the southern gas corridor. The article first examines the Russia-Ukraine natural gas crisis. It then moves to analyze the reasons behind Russia’s changing of the name and the route of the South Stream project. After exploring Turkey’s involvement in the project, the article concludes by arguing that both countries adopted a win-win approach toward the project that Russia has gained a significant tariff advantage and freedom from the EU third-party-access rule. The article claims that although both Russia and Turkey have different perspectives on some issues in international politics, they can develop their cooperation with a win-win approach in the TurkStream project.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Insight Turkey POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Insight Turkey, a quarterly journal in circulation since 1999, is published by SETA Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research under the editorship of Ihsan Dagi from the Middle East Technical University. Currently in its 12th volume, Insight Turkey covers a broad range of topics related to Turkish domestic and foreign policy, as well as its adjacent regions such as the Middle East, the Caucasus, the Balkans and Europe. As a peer-reviewed policy-oriented journal, Insight Turkey intends to present original thinking by knowledgeable observers both from Turkey and abroad and provide a forum for informed discussion on Turkish politics and foreign policy.