当前临床实践指南中小细胞肺癌的放疗

IF 7.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Haiyan Zeng , Dirk K.M. De Ruysscher , Xiao Hu , Danyang Zheng , Li Yang , Umberto Ricardi , Feng-Ming Spring Kong , Lizza E.L. Hendriks
{"title":"当前临床实践指南中小细胞肺癌的放疗","authors":"Haiyan Zeng ,&nbsp;Dirk K.M. De Ruysscher ,&nbsp;Xiao Hu ,&nbsp;Danyang Zheng ,&nbsp;Li Yang ,&nbsp;Umberto Ricardi ,&nbsp;Feng-Ming Spring Kong ,&nbsp;Lizza E.L. Hendriks","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2022.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several guidelines including radiotherapy recommendations exist worldwide for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). To evaluate the differences in radiotherapy recommendations we conducted a systematic review. PubMed and the sites of medical societies were searched for SCLC guidelines published in either English, Chinese, or Dutch. This was limited to January 2018 till February 2021 to only include up-to-date recommendations. Data was extracted and compared regarding the guideline's development method and radiotherapy recommendations. Eleven guidelines were identified (PubMed n=4, societies n=7) from Spain (n=1), Canada (n=1), America (n=3), United Kingdom (n=1), the Netherlands (n=1), and China (n=3), respectively. Nine guidelines assessed the strength of evidence (SOE) and specified the strength of recommendation (SOR), although methods were different. The major radiotherapy recommendations are similar although differences exist in thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose, time, and volume. Controversial areas are TRT in resected stage I-IIA (pN1), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in resected as well as unresected stage I-IIA, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in unresected stage I-IIA, PCI time, and PCI versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance in stage IV. The existence of several overlapping guidelines for SCLC treatment indicates that guideline development is (unnecessarily) repeated by different organizations or societies. Improvement could be made by better international collaboration to avoid duplicating unnecessary work, which would spare a lot of time and resources. Efforts should be made to work together on controversial or unknown fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 113-125"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000059/pdfft?md5=f3ee2faf3d13f2558c706c7f51de5a93&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005422000059-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer in current clinical practice guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Haiyan Zeng ,&nbsp;Dirk K.M. De Ruysscher ,&nbsp;Xiao Hu ,&nbsp;Danyang Zheng ,&nbsp;Li Yang ,&nbsp;Umberto Ricardi ,&nbsp;Feng-Ming Spring Kong ,&nbsp;Lizza E.L. Hendriks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jncc.2022.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Several guidelines including radiotherapy recommendations exist worldwide for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). To evaluate the differences in radiotherapy recommendations we conducted a systematic review. PubMed and the sites of medical societies were searched for SCLC guidelines published in either English, Chinese, or Dutch. This was limited to January 2018 till February 2021 to only include up-to-date recommendations. Data was extracted and compared regarding the guideline's development method and radiotherapy recommendations. Eleven guidelines were identified (PubMed n=4, societies n=7) from Spain (n=1), Canada (n=1), America (n=3), United Kingdom (n=1), the Netherlands (n=1), and China (n=3), respectively. Nine guidelines assessed the strength of evidence (SOE) and specified the strength of recommendation (SOR), although methods were different. The major radiotherapy recommendations are similar although differences exist in thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose, time, and volume. Controversial areas are TRT in resected stage I-IIA (pN1), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in resected as well as unresected stage I-IIA, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in unresected stage I-IIA, PCI time, and PCI versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance in stage IV. The existence of several overlapping guidelines for SCLC treatment indicates that guideline development is (unnecessarily) repeated by different organizations or societies. Improvement could be made by better international collaboration to avoid duplicating unnecessary work, which would spare a lot of time and resources. Efforts should be made to work together on controversial or unknown fields.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 113-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000059/pdfft?md5=f3ee2faf3d13f2558c706c7f51de5a93&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005422000059-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

世界范围内存在一些治疗小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的指南,包括放疗建议。为了评估放疗建议的差异,我们进行了一项系统综述。检索PubMed和医学学会网站,查找以英文、中文或荷兰文出版的SCLC指南。这仅限于2018年1月至2021年2月,仅包括最新的建议。提取数据并比较指南的制定方法和放疗建议。分别从西班牙(n=1)、加拿大(n=1)、美国(n=3)、英国(n=1)、荷兰(n=1)和中国(n=3)确定了11份指南(PubMed n=4, societies n=7)。9项指南评估了证据强度(SOE)并指定了推荐强度(SOR),尽管方法不同。尽管在胸部放疗(TRT)剂量、时间和体积上存在差异,但主要的放疗建议是相似的。有争议的领域包括切除I-IIA期(pN1)的TRT,切除和未切除I-IIA期的预防性颅脑照射(PCI),未切除I-IIA期的立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT), PCI时间,IV期的PCI与磁共振成像(MRI)监测。SCLC治疗的几个重叠指南的存在表明不同组织或协会重复制定指南(不必要)。可以通过更好的国际合作来改进,以避免重复不必要的工作,这将节省大量的时间和资源。应努力在有争议或未知的领域共同努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer in current clinical practice guidelines

Several guidelines including radiotherapy recommendations exist worldwide for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). To evaluate the differences in radiotherapy recommendations we conducted a systematic review. PubMed and the sites of medical societies were searched for SCLC guidelines published in either English, Chinese, or Dutch. This was limited to January 2018 till February 2021 to only include up-to-date recommendations. Data was extracted and compared regarding the guideline's development method and radiotherapy recommendations. Eleven guidelines were identified (PubMed n=4, societies n=7) from Spain (n=1), Canada (n=1), America (n=3), United Kingdom (n=1), the Netherlands (n=1), and China (n=3), respectively. Nine guidelines assessed the strength of evidence (SOE) and specified the strength of recommendation (SOR), although methods were different. The major radiotherapy recommendations are similar although differences exist in thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose, time, and volume. Controversial areas are TRT in resected stage I-IIA (pN1), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in resected as well as unresected stage I-IIA, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in unresected stage I-IIA, PCI time, and PCI versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance in stage IV. The existence of several overlapping guidelines for SCLC treatment indicates that guideline development is (unnecessarily) repeated by different organizations or societies. Improvement could be made by better international collaboration to avoid duplicating unnecessary work, which would spare a lot of time and resources. Efforts should be made to work together on controversial or unknown fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信