用语义专利分析方法评估可专利性。数学-逻辑方法

IF 2.2 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Valentin J. Schmitt, Lothar Walter, Frank C. Schnittker
{"title":"用语义专利分析方法评估可专利性。数学-逻辑方法","authors":"Valentin J. Schmitt,&nbsp;Lothar Walter,&nbsp;Frank C. Schnittker","doi":"10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>To obtain patent protection, a patent must fulfill statutory patentability<span> requirements examined by a patent office. Such examinations are mostly performed manually and are quite time-consuming. Therefore, we suggest a computer-based process for the assessment of patentability by means of a mathematical-logical approach comparing patents with semantic structures. In order to make such an assessment, we compare the feature combinations of patent claims with the pertinent prior art. For </span></span>proof of concept<span>, the process has been tested successfully on an US-application claiming a method for raising a crane boom which can be categorized as non-patentable with regard to the requirement of non-obviousness. The result is consistent with that of a USPTO patent examiner, which underpins that at least under certain conditions not only patent examiners but also applicants and third parties can assess the chance and scope of protection for claimed inventions and patent applications with regard to patentability by our process.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51794,"journal":{"name":"World Patent Information","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 102182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of patentability by means of semantic patent analysis – A mathematical-logical approach\",\"authors\":\"Valentin J. Schmitt,&nbsp;Lothar Walter,&nbsp;Frank C. Schnittker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>To obtain patent protection, a patent must fulfill statutory patentability<span> requirements examined by a patent office. Such examinations are mostly performed manually and are quite time-consuming. Therefore, we suggest a computer-based process for the assessment of patentability by means of a mathematical-logical approach comparing patents with semantic structures. In order to make such an assessment, we compare the feature combinations of patent claims with the pertinent prior art. For </span></span>proof of concept<span>, the process has been tested successfully on an US-application claiming a method for raising a crane boom which can be categorized as non-patentable with regard to the requirement of non-obviousness. The result is consistent with that of a USPTO patent examiner, which underpins that at least under certain conditions not only patent examiners but also applicants and third parties can assess the chance and scope of protection for claimed inventions and patent applications with regard to patentability by our process.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Patent Information\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Patent Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172219023000121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Patent Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172219023000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了获得专利保护,专利必须符合专利局审查的法定可专利性要求。这些检查大多是手工进行的,而且相当耗时。因此,我们建议采用一种基于计算机的方法,通过数学-逻辑方法将专利与语义结构进行比较,从而评估可专利性。为了做出这样的评估,我们将专利权利要求的特征组合与相关的现有技术进行比较。为了证明概念,该方法已在一份美国申请中进行了成功的测试,该申请声称是一种提升起重机臂架的方法,根据非显而易见性的要求,该方法可被归类为不可专利的。结果与USPTO专利审查员的结果是一致的,这表明至少在某些条件下,不仅专利审查员,而且申请人和第三方也可以通过我们的方法评估关于专利性的权利要求发明和专利申请的保护机会和范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of patentability by means of semantic patent analysis – A mathematical-logical approach

To obtain patent protection, a patent must fulfill statutory patentability requirements examined by a patent office. Such examinations are mostly performed manually and are quite time-consuming. Therefore, we suggest a computer-based process for the assessment of patentability by means of a mathematical-logical approach comparing patents with semantic structures. In order to make such an assessment, we compare the feature combinations of patent claims with the pertinent prior art. For proof of concept, the process has been tested successfully on an US-application claiming a method for raising a crane boom which can be categorized as non-patentable with regard to the requirement of non-obviousness. The result is consistent with that of a USPTO patent examiner, which underpins that at least under certain conditions not only patent examiners but also applicants and third parties can assess the chance and scope of protection for claimed inventions and patent applications with regard to patentability by our process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Patent Information
World Patent Information INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The aim of World Patent Information is to provide a worldwide forum for the exchange of information between people working professionally in the field of Industrial Property information and documentation and to promote the widest possible use of the associated literature. Regular features include: papers concerned with all aspects of Industrial Property information and documentation; new regulations pertinent to Industrial Property information and documentation; short reports on relevant meetings and conferences; bibliographies, together with book and literature reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信