尼日利亚农村非农业收入多样化的构成和决定因素

O. O. Olugbire, O. E. Obafunsho, T. Olarewaju, R. Kolade, F. A. Odediran, L. A. Orumwense
{"title":"尼日利亚农村非农业收入多样化的构成和决定因素","authors":"O. O. Olugbire, O. E. Obafunsho, T. Olarewaju, R. Kolade, F. A. Odediran, L. A. Orumwense","doi":"10.17306/j.jard.2020.01344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Farming has been considered as main source of income for rural households in Nigeria, despite their involvement in other income generating activities. Focusing on income derivable from farming alone may be partially responsible for the ineffective poverty reduction strategies in Nigeria. Using the National Living Standard Survey data collected by the National Bureau of Statistics, this paper investigated the composition and determinants of non-farm incomes of rural households in Nigeria. The results show that the share of farm, non-farm wage (NFW)- and self-employment (NFS) incomes in total household incomes were 24.3%, 43.0% and 23.7% respectively. Households whose heads are male (0.647), had formal education (0.522), increased the likelihood of households’ participation in NFW activities, while access to credit (-0.307) and having larger farm size (-0.221) decreased it. Access to credit (0.379); community participation (0.103); larger family size (0.193) and possession of capital assets (0.069) increased the likelihood of participation in NFS-employment activities, while having larger farm size (-0.211) decreased it. The study concludes that policy targeting poverty reduction should focus on providing enabling environment for poor households’ access to non-farm activities in the study area.","PeriodicalId":30385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPOSITION AND DETERMINANTS OF RURAL NON-FARM INCOME DIVERSIFICATION IN NIGERIA\",\"authors\":\"O. O. Olugbire, O. E. Obafunsho, T. Olarewaju, R. Kolade, F. A. Odediran, L. A. Orumwense\",\"doi\":\"10.17306/j.jard.2020.01344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Farming has been considered as main source of income for rural households in Nigeria, despite their involvement in other income generating activities. Focusing on income derivable from farming alone may be partially responsible for the ineffective poverty reduction strategies in Nigeria. Using the National Living Standard Survey data collected by the National Bureau of Statistics, this paper investigated the composition and determinants of non-farm incomes of rural households in Nigeria. The results show that the share of farm, non-farm wage (NFW)- and self-employment (NFS) incomes in total household incomes were 24.3%, 43.0% and 23.7% respectively. Households whose heads are male (0.647), had formal education (0.522), increased the likelihood of households’ participation in NFW activities, while access to credit (-0.307) and having larger farm size (-0.221) decreased it. Access to credit (0.379); community participation (0.103); larger family size (0.193) and possession of capital assets (0.069) increased the likelihood of participation in NFS-employment activities, while having larger farm size (-0.211) decreased it. The study concludes that policy targeting poverty reduction should focus on providing enabling environment for poor households’ access to non-farm activities in the study area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2020.01344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2020.01344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业一直被认为是尼日利亚农村家庭的主要收入来源,尽管他们也从事其他创收活动。只注重农业收入可能是尼日利亚减贫战略无效的部分原因。本文利用国家统计局收集的全国生活水平调查数据,调查了尼日利亚农村家庭非农业收入的构成和决定因素。结果表明,农业收入、非农工资收入和自营职业收入占家庭总收入的比例分别为24.3%、43.0%和23.7%。户主为男性的家庭(0.647)、受过正规教育的家庭(0.522)增加了家庭参与农村妇女活动的可能性,而获得信贷的家庭(-0.307)和农场规模较大的家庭(-0.221)则降低了家庭参与农村妇女活动的可能性。获得信贷(0.379);社区参与(0.103);较大的家庭规模(0.193)和拥有资本资产(0.069)增加了参与nfs就业活动的可能性,而较大的农场规模(-0.211)则降低了参与nfs就业活动的可能性。研究得出结论,减贫政策应侧重于为研究地区贫困家庭参与非农业活动提供有利环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPOSITION AND DETERMINANTS OF RURAL NON-FARM INCOME DIVERSIFICATION IN NIGERIA
Farming has been considered as main source of income for rural households in Nigeria, despite their involvement in other income generating activities. Focusing on income derivable from farming alone may be partially responsible for the ineffective poverty reduction strategies in Nigeria. Using the National Living Standard Survey data collected by the National Bureau of Statistics, this paper investigated the composition and determinants of non-farm incomes of rural households in Nigeria. The results show that the share of farm, non-farm wage (NFW)- and self-employment (NFS) incomes in total household incomes were 24.3%, 43.0% and 23.7% respectively. Households whose heads are male (0.647), had formal education (0.522), increased the likelihood of households’ participation in NFW activities, while access to credit (-0.307) and having larger farm size (-0.221) decreased it. Access to credit (0.379); community participation (0.103); larger family size (0.193) and possession of capital assets (0.069) increased the likelihood of participation in NFS-employment activities, while having larger farm size (-0.211) decreased it. The study concludes that policy targeting poverty reduction should focus on providing enabling environment for poor households’ access to non-farm activities in the study area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信