刚性脊柱矫形器对腰痛患者肌肉能力的影响——3个月随访研究

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
D. Rimaud, Naomi Rieffel, I. Fayolle-Minon, P. Vedreine, E. Ebermeyer, J.-F. Salmochi, O. Jacquin, Emmanuel Dye, Clément Mazel, P. Calmels
{"title":"刚性脊柱矫形器对腰痛患者肌肉能力的影响——3个月随访研究","authors":"D. Rimaud, Naomi Rieffel, I. Fayolle-Minon, P. Vedreine, E. Ebermeyer, J.-F. Salmochi, O. Jacquin, Emmanuel Dye, Clément Mazel, P. Calmels","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction In chronic low back pain, the use of lumbar orthosis treatment is not part of general recommendations due to a lack of supporting evidence. However, interest in segmental immobilization at the mechanical and postural level is still current in practice, with, however, the belief of negative effects on muscular capacity. The objective of our study was to assess the evolution of muscle capacity after wearing custom-made rigid corset in patients with chronic low back pain. Materials and Methods This is a multicenter study in patients with chronic low back pain, for which the wearing of a rigid postural immobilization corset for 3 months was prescribed. Twenty-two patients completed all follow-up assessments at baseline, 45 days, and 3 months. Evaluations included Biering-Sørensen test, Shirado test, chair test, hand/ground test, lateral inclination test, Quebec scale, and visual analog scale. Results The results revealed a significant improvement of Biering-Sørensen test after 3 months (37.0 ± 53.6 seconds at D0, 41.3 ± 51.7 seconds at D45, and 53.2 ± 60.5 seconds at D90; P < 0.05), in hand/ground distance (21.8 ± 28.5 cm at D0, 15.5 ± 17.8 cm at D45, and 12.2 ± 15.5 cm at D90; P < 0.05), in disability based on the Quebec questionnaire (0.52 ± 0.21 at D0, 0.45 ± 0.19 at D45, and 0.39 ± 0.19 at D90; P < 0.05), and significant reductions in visual analog scale measures of pain (6.0 ± 1.7 at D0, 3.7 ± 1.7 at D45, and 2.7 ± 1.9 at D90; P < 0.05). Conclusions This study shows that the wearing of a rigid orthosis does not alter the muscular endurance capacities of the trunk muscles. In view of the results, wearing a rigid orthosis may be an alternative to treating chronic low back pain. It does not induce muscle loss and may even contribute to motor disinhibition, resulting in improved spinal mobility and functional abilities. Clinical Relevance The common belief that wearing a spinal orthosis leads to muscle loss should no longer be an obstacle to its prescription since it helps to maintain muscle capacity and reduces pain.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"35 1","pages":"19 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Rigid Spinal Orthosis on the Muscular Capacity of Patients With Low Back Pain - A 3-Month Follow-up Study\",\"authors\":\"D. Rimaud, Naomi Rieffel, I. Fayolle-Minon, P. Vedreine, E. Ebermeyer, J.-F. Salmochi, O. Jacquin, Emmanuel Dye, Clément Mazel, P. Calmels\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction In chronic low back pain, the use of lumbar orthosis treatment is not part of general recommendations due to a lack of supporting evidence. However, interest in segmental immobilization at the mechanical and postural level is still current in practice, with, however, the belief of negative effects on muscular capacity. The objective of our study was to assess the evolution of muscle capacity after wearing custom-made rigid corset in patients with chronic low back pain. Materials and Methods This is a multicenter study in patients with chronic low back pain, for which the wearing of a rigid postural immobilization corset for 3 months was prescribed. Twenty-two patients completed all follow-up assessments at baseline, 45 days, and 3 months. Evaluations included Biering-Sørensen test, Shirado test, chair test, hand/ground test, lateral inclination test, Quebec scale, and visual analog scale. Results The results revealed a significant improvement of Biering-Sørensen test after 3 months (37.0 ± 53.6 seconds at D0, 41.3 ± 51.7 seconds at D45, and 53.2 ± 60.5 seconds at D90; P < 0.05), in hand/ground distance (21.8 ± 28.5 cm at D0, 15.5 ± 17.8 cm at D45, and 12.2 ± 15.5 cm at D90; P < 0.05), in disability based on the Quebec questionnaire (0.52 ± 0.21 at D0, 0.45 ± 0.19 at D45, and 0.39 ± 0.19 at D90; P < 0.05), and significant reductions in visual analog scale measures of pain (6.0 ± 1.7 at D0, 3.7 ± 1.7 at D45, and 2.7 ± 1.9 at D90; P < 0.05). Conclusions This study shows that the wearing of a rigid orthosis does not alter the muscular endurance capacities of the trunk muscles. In view of the results, wearing a rigid orthosis may be an alternative to treating chronic low back pain. It does not induce muscle loss and may even contribute to motor disinhibition, resulting in improved spinal mobility and functional abilities. Clinical Relevance The common belief that wearing a spinal orthosis leads to muscle loss should no longer be an obstacle to its prescription since it helps to maintain muscle capacity and reduces pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要引言在慢性腰痛中,由于缺乏支持性证据,使用腰椎矫形器治疗不是一般建议的一部分。然而,目前在实践中,人们对机械和姿势水平的节段固定仍然感兴趣,然而,人们认为这会对肌肉能力产生负面影响。我们研究的目的是评估慢性腰痛患者穿着定制的紧身胸衣后肌肉能力的演变。材料和方法这是一项针对慢性腰痛患者的多中心研究,要求患者佩戴刚性体位固定胸衣3个月。22名患者在基线、45天和3个月完成了所有随访评估。评估包括Biering-Sørensen测试、Shirado测试、椅子测试、手/地测试、横向倾斜测试、魁北克量表和视觉模拟量表。结果Biering-Sørensen试验在3个月后(D0时37.0±53.6秒,D45时41.3±51.7秒,D90时53.2±60.5秒;P<0.05),手/地距离(D0处21.8±28.5厘米,D45处15.5±17.8厘米,D90处12.2±15.5厘米;P<0.05)有显著改善,基于魁北克问卷的残疾(D0时为0.52±0.21,D45时为0.45±0.19,D90时为0.39±0.19;P<0.05),疼痛的视觉模拟量表测量值显著降低(D0时为6.0±1.7,D45时为3.7±1.7,D90时为2.7±1.9;P<0.05)。结论本研究表明,佩戴刚性矫形器不会改变躯干肌肉的肌肉耐力。从结果来看,佩戴刚性矫形器可能是治疗慢性腰痛的一种替代方案。它不会引起肌肉损失,甚至可能有助于运动去抑制,从而提高脊柱的灵活性和功能能力。临床相关性佩戴脊柱矫形器会导致肌肉损失的普遍看法不应再成为其处方的障碍,因为它有助于保持肌肉能力并减轻疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Rigid Spinal Orthosis on the Muscular Capacity of Patients With Low Back Pain - A 3-Month Follow-up Study
ABSTRACT Introduction In chronic low back pain, the use of lumbar orthosis treatment is not part of general recommendations due to a lack of supporting evidence. However, interest in segmental immobilization at the mechanical and postural level is still current in practice, with, however, the belief of negative effects on muscular capacity. The objective of our study was to assess the evolution of muscle capacity after wearing custom-made rigid corset in patients with chronic low back pain. Materials and Methods This is a multicenter study in patients with chronic low back pain, for which the wearing of a rigid postural immobilization corset for 3 months was prescribed. Twenty-two patients completed all follow-up assessments at baseline, 45 days, and 3 months. Evaluations included Biering-Sørensen test, Shirado test, chair test, hand/ground test, lateral inclination test, Quebec scale, and visual analog scale. Results The results revealed a significant improvement of Biering-Sørensen test after 3 months (37.0 ± 53.6 seconds at D0, 41.3 ± 51.7 seconds at D45, and 53.2 ± 60.5 seconds at D90; P < 0.05), in hand/ground distance (21.8 ± 28.5 cm at D0, 15.5 ± 17.8 cm at D45, and 12.2 ± 15.5 cm at D90; P < 0.05), in disability based on the Quebec questionnaire (0.52 ± 0.21 at D0, 0.45 ± 0.19 at D45, and 0.39 ± 0.19 at D90; P < 0.05), and significant reductions in visual analog scale measures of pain (6.0 ± 1.7 at D0, 3.7 ± 1.7 at D45, and 2.7 ± 1.9 at D90; P < 0.05). Conclusions This study shows that the wearing of a rigid orthosis does not alter the muscular endurance capacities of the trunk muscles. In view of the results, wearing a rigid orthosis may be an alternative to treating chronic low back pain. It does not induce muscle loss and may even contribute to motor disinhibition, resulting in improved spinal mobility and functional abilities. Clinical Relevance The common belief that wearing a spinal orthosis leads to muscle loss should no longer be an obstacle to its prescription since it helps to maintain muscle capacity and reduces pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信