“把你的权力放在线上”:在师徒关系和同伴关系中体现盟友关系

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
G. Kim, Tina M. Durand, Tanvi N. Shah, Bushra I. Ismail
{"title":"“把你的权力放在线上”:在师徒关系和同伴关系中体现盟友关系","authors":"G. Kim, Tina M. Durand, Tanvi N. Shah, Bushra I. Ismail","doi":"10.1080/15427609.2021.1942686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although relational and multicultural feminist mentoring models have interrogated the role of relationships and power in graduate mentor-mentee relationships, less work has examined graduate student mentoring within psychology in the context of social justice and equity goals, and the processes by which ally and accomplice actions might emerge in doctoral mentoring and peer relationships, in particular. Using Collaborative Autoethnography (CAE), we examined the ways that doctoral mentors, mentees, and peers navigate power, privilege, and allyship in the academy, and how relationships and ally actions are connected. Our data was generated through individual autoethnographic writing and subsequent dialogue among the four authors. Qualitative analyses generated three action-oriented themes that illustrate a mutually constituted and interactive process by which we, as collaborators, strive for allyship within the confines of the academic status quo, and where resistance, authenticity, and identity-affirming relationships are integral to equity-based action and change.","PeriodicalId":47096,"journal":{"name":"Research in Human Development","volume":"18 1","pages":"54 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15427609.2021.1942686","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“PUTTING YOUR POWER ON THE LINE”: TOWARD EMBODIED ALLYSHIP IN MENTOR-MENTEE AND PEER RELATIONSHIPS\",\"authors\":\"G. Kim, Tina M. Durand, Tanvi N. Shah, Bushra I. Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15427609.2021.1942686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although relational and multicultural feminist mentoring models have interrogated the role of relationships and power in graduate mentor-mentee relationships, less work has examined graduate student mentoring within psychology in the context of social justice and equity goals, and the processes by which ally and accomplice actions might emerge in doctoral mentoring and peer relationships, in particular. Using Collaborative Autoethnography (CAE), we examined the ways that doctoral mentors, mentees, and peers navigate power, privilege, and allyship in the academy, and how relationships and ally actions are connected. Our data was generated through individual autoethnographic writing and subsequent dialogue among the four authors. Qualitative analyses generated three action-oriented themes that illustrate a mutually constituted and interactive process by which we, as collaborators, strive for allyship within the confines of the academic status quo, and where resistance, authenticity, and identity-affirming relationships are integral to equity-based action and change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Human Development\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"54 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15427609.2021.1942686\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2021.1942686\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2021.1942686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管关系和多元文化女权主义指导模式已经质疑了关系和权力在研究生师徒关系中的作用,但很少有研究在社会正义和公平目标的背景下研究心理学中的研究生指导,特别是在博士生指导和同伴关系中可能出现的盟友和同谋行为的过程。利用协作式自我人种志(CAE),我们研究了博士导师、学员和同行在学院中驾驭权力、特权和盟友关系的方式,以及关系和盟友行为是如何联系在一起的。我们的数据是通过个人的民族志写作和四位作者之间的后续对话产生的。定性分析产生了三个以行动为导向的主题,说明了一个相互构成和互动的过程,通过这个过程,我们作为合作者,在学术现状的范围内努力建立盟友关系,并且抵抗,真实性和身份确认关系是基于公平的行动和变革的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“PUTTING YOUR POWER ON THE LINE”: TOWARD EMBODIED ALLYSHIP IN MENTOR-MENTEE AND PEER RELATIONSHIPS
Although relational and multicultural feminist mentoring models have interrogated the role of relationships and power in graduate mentor-mentee relationships, less work has examined graduate student mentoring within psychology in the context of social justice and equity goals, and the processes by which ally and accomplice actions might emerge in doctoral mentoring and peer relationships, in particular. Using Collaborative Autoethnography (CAE), we examined the ways that doctoral mentors, mentees, and peers navigate power, privilege, and allyship in the academy, and how relationships and ally actions are connected. Our data was generated through individual autoethnographic writing and subsequent dialogue among the four authors. Qualitative analyses generated three action-oriented themes that illustrate a mutually constituted and interactive process by which we, as collaborators, strive for allyship within the confines of the academic status quo, and where resistance, authenticity, and identity-affirming relationships are integral to equity-based action and change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Human Development
Research in Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信