{"title":"对最高法院2021年5月26日I KK 23/21号判决的解释","authors":"Zuzanna B. Gądzik","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.44-z.b.gadzik","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary In the gloss to the decision of the Supreme Court of 26 May 2021 (I KK 23/21), the issue of the correctness of establishing the scope of the term “health service” with regard to treatments in the field of aesthetic medicine was addressed. In this context, it has been analyzed which entities can legally carry out such treatments and in which cases taking specific actions by an unauthorized person will result in criminal or disciplinary liability.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"177 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gloss on the Supreme Court Decision of May 26, 2021, I KK 23/21\",\"authors\":\"Zuzanna B. Gądzik\",\"doi\":\"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.44-z.b.gadzik\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary In the gloss to the decision of the Supreme Court of 26 May 2021 (I KK 23/21), the issue of the correctness of establishing the scope of the term “health service” with regard to treatments in the field of aesthetic medicine was addressed. In this context, it has been analyzed which entities can legally carry out such treatments and in which cases taking specific actions by an unauthorized person will result in criminal or disciplinary liability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ius Novum\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"177 - 188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ius Novum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.44-z.b.gadzik\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.44-z.b.gadzik","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要在最高法院2021年5月26日的裁决（I KK 23/21）中，讨论了在美容医学领域确定“医疗服务”一词的范围的正确性问题。在这方面，已经分析了哪些实体可以合法地进行这种处理，以及在哪些情况下，未经授权的人采取具体行动将导致刑事或纪律责任。
Gloss on the Supreme Court Decision of May 26, 2021, I KK 23/21
Summary In the gloss to the decision of the Supreme Court of 26 May 2021 (I KK 23/21), the issue of the correctness of establishing the scope of the term “health service” with regard to treatments in the field of aesthetic medicine was addressed. In this context, it has been analyzed which entities can legally carry out such treatments and in which cases taking specific actions by an unauthorized person will result in criminal or disciplinary liability.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
