恰帕斯土地诉讼档案的历史。方法论建议

IF 0.3 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
M. Annereau-Fulbert, A. F. Flores Hernández
{"title":"恰帕斯土地诉讼档案的历史。方法论建议","authors":"M. Annereau-Fulbert, A. F. Flores Hernández","doi":"10.19130/iifl.ecm.2021.58.23864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Chiapas, and particularly in the Highland region, few colonial indigenous documents have been found that are similar to those produced by the neighboring Maya peoples of the Guatemala Highlands and the Yucatan Peninsula. The question of whether or not such sources exist is an legitimate one, considering the importance of these testimonies for linking Postclassic historical processes to the development of indigenous societies in the Colonial era. In this respect, the Chiapa Title is an exception. It is a record that gives us a glimpse of the dynamics and conflicts that unfolded between two large political centers: Chiapa and Zinacantan. Thus, the objective of this article is not to reexamine the content of the document, whose classification as a ''title'' is erroneous, but to analyze the nature and form of this fragment and contextualize it in the framework of the legal discourse of the era and the conflicts between the so-called ''pueblos indios''. To this end, we set forth the methodological guidelines used in our examination of the document, as well as reflections on its complex connection to the still fragmentary archeological corpus from the Postclassic period and its transition to the Colonial era.","PeriodicalId":43489,"journal":{"name":"Estudios de Cultura Maya","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La historia de un expediente de litigio de tierra en Chiapas. Una propuesta metodológica\",\"authors\":\"M. Annereau-Fulbert, A. F. Flores Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.19130/iifl.ecm.2021.58.23864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Chiapas, and particularly in the Highland region, few colonial indigenous documents have been found that are similar to those produced by the neighboring Maya peoples of the Guatemala Highlands and the Yucatan Peninsula. The question of whether or not such sources exist is an legitimate one, considering the importance of these testimonies for linking Postclassic historical processes to the development of indigenous societies in the Colonial era. In this respect, the Chiapa Title is an exception. It is a record that gives us a glimpse of the dynamics and conflicts that unfolded between two large political centers: Chiapa and Zinacantan. Thus, the objective of this article is not to reexamine the content of the document, whose classification as a ''title'' is erroneous, but to analyze the nature and form of this fragment and contextualize it in the framework of the legal discourse of the era and the conflicts between the so-called ''pueblos indios''. To this end, we set forth the methodological guidelines used in our examination of the document, as well as reflections on its complex connection to the still fragmentary archeological corpus from the Postclassic period and its transition to the Colonial era.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios de Cultura Maya\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios de Cultura Maya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.2021.58.23864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios de Cultura Maya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.2021.58.23864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在恰帕斯,特别是在高地地区,很少发现与危地马拉高地和尤卡坦半岛邻近的玛雅人制作的相似的殖民地土著文件。考虑到这些证词对于将后古典历史进程与殖民时代土著社会的发展联系起来的重要性,这些来源是否存在的问题是一个合理的问题。在这方面,恰帕标题是个例外。这是一份记录,让我们得以一窥两个大型政治中心:恰帕和齐纳坎坦之间的动态和冲突。因此,本文的目的不是重新审视文件的内容,因为将其归类为“标题”是错误的,而是分析这一片段的性质和形式,并将其置于时代法律话语和所谓“印第安人部落”之间冲突的框架中。为此,我们提出了在我们审查该文件时使用的方法指导方针,以及对其与后古典时期及其向殖民时代过渡的仍然支离破碎的考古语料库的复杂联系的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La historia de un expediente de litigio de tierra en Chiapas. Una propuesta metodológica
In Chiapas, and particularly in the Highland region, few colonial indigenous documents have been found that are similar to those produced by the neighboring Maya peoples of the Guatemala Highlands and the Yucatan Peninsula. The question of whether or not such sources exist is an legitimate one, considering the importance of these testimonies for linking Postclassic historical processes to the development of indigenous societies in the Colonial era. In this respect, the Chiapa Title is an exception. It is a record that gives us a glimpse of the dynamics and conflicts that unfolded between two large political centers: Chiapa and Zinacantan. Thus, the objective of this article is not to reexamine the content of the document, whose classification as a ''title'' is erroneous, but to analyze the nature and form of this fragment and contextualize it in the framework of the legal discourse of the era and the conflicts between the so-called ''pueblos indios''. To this end, we set forth the methodological guidelines used in our examination of the document, as well as reflections on its complex connection to the still fragmentary archeological corpus from the Postclassic period and its transition to the Colonial era.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios de Cultura Maya
Estudios de Cultura Maya ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信