设计、开发和修改卓越业务框架的调查

IF 2.5 Q3 BUSINESS
Saad Ghafoor, N. Grigg, R. Mann
{"title":"设计、开发和修改卓越业务框架的调查","authors":"Saad Ghafoor, N. Grigg, R. Mann","doi":"10.1108/mbe-10-2020-0137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate how business excellence (BE) custodians (BECs) design, develop and modify their BE frameworks (BEF’s) and to provide a general framework for reviewing BEFs. The design process is important to understand as these BEFs are used to help organisations understand the components of BE to guide them towards world-class performance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe first step was to identify all the BE awards (BEAs) worldwide and their BEFs by conducting a review of publicly available sources. This research was then limited to only those BEAs that was held no more than two years ago. Of these, 29 BECs (with active BEAs) in 26 countries agreed to participate in the research. Data was collected with the help of a survey and 13 BECs also undertook optional follow-up interviews.\n\n\nFindings\nIn total, 56 countries and regions have 65 active BEAs with another 17 countries having BE initiatives. The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) excellence model and the Baldrige excellence framework are used by 37.7% and 14.5% of BECs worldwide, respectively. In total, 58.3% of the BECs review their BEFs once every three years or sooner, 100% of the BECs are confident in their BEFs’ fundamental concepts and 96.5% in their categories. There are fewer active BEAs now and the use of BE is potentially decreasing which suggests that more effort is required by the BECs in promoting BE.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research collects data directly from the BECs on how BECs design and develop BEFs and provides a general framework for reviewing BEFs.\n","PeriodicalId":18468,"journal":{"name":"Measuring Business Excellence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of designing, developing and modifying business excellence frameworks\",\"authors\":\"Saad Ghafoor, N. Grigg, R. Mann\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mbe-10-2020-0137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to investigate how business excellence (BE) custodians (BECs) design, develop and modify their BE frameworks (BEF’s) and to provide a general framework for reviewing BEFs. The design process is important to understand as these BEFs are used to help organisations understand the components of BE to guide them towards world-class performance.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe first step was to identify all the BE awards (BEAs) worldwide and their BEFs by conducting a review of publicly available sources. This research was then limited to only those BEAs that was held no more than two years ago. Of these, 29 BECs (with active BEAs) in 26 countries agreed to participate in the research. Data was collected with the help of a survey and 13 BECs also undertook optional follow-up interviews.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIn total, 56 countries and regions have 65 active BEAs with another 17 countries having BE initiatives. The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) excellence model and the Baldrige excellence framework are used by 37.7% and 14.5% of BECs worldwide, respectively. In total, 58.3% of the BECs review their BEFs once every three years or sooner, 100% of the BECs are confident in their BEFs’ fundamental concepts and 96.5% in their categories. There are fewer active BEAs now and the use of BE is potentially decreasing which suggests that more effort is required by the BECs in promoting BE.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research collects data directly from the BECs on how BECs design and develop BEFs and provides a general framework for reviewing BEFs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":18468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measuring Business Excellence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measuring Business Excellence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-10-2020-0137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measuring Business Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-10-2020-0137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本文旨在研究卓越商业(BE)托管人(BEC)如何设计、开发和修改其BE框架(BEF),并为审查BEF提供一个通用框架。设计过程非常重要,因为这些BEF用于帮助组织了解BE的组成部分,以引导他们实现世界级的性能。设计/方法/方法第一步是通过对公开来源进行审查,确定全球所有BE奖项及其BEF。当时,这项研究仅限于两年前举行的BEA。其中,来自26个国家的29个BEC(有活跃的BEA)同意参与这项研究。数据是在调查的帮助下收集的,13名BEC也进行了可选的后续访谈。发现总共有56个国家和地区有65个活跃的BEA,另有17个国家有BE倡议。欧洲质量管理基金会(EFQM)卓越模式和波多里奇卓越框架分别被全球37.7%和14.5%的BEC使用。总的来说,58.3%的BEC每三年或更短时间审查一次BEF,100%的BEC对其BEF的基本概念有信心,96.5%的BEC在其类别中有信心。现在活跃的BE越来越少,BE的使用可能正在减少,这表明BEC在推广BE方面需要付出更多的努力。原始性/价值这项研究直接从BEC收集了BEC如何设计和开发BEF的数据,并为审查BEF提供了一个通用框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An investigation of designing, developing and modifying business excellence frameworks
Purpose This paper aims to investigate how business excellence (BE) custodians (BECs) design, develop and modify their BE frameworks (BEF’s) and to provide a general framework for reviewing BEFs. The design process is important to understand as these BEFs are used to help organisations understand the components of BE to guide them towards world-class performance. Design/methodology/approach The first step was to identify all the BE awards (BEAs) worldwide and their BEFs by conducting a review of publicly available sources. This research was then limited to only those BEAs that was held no more than two years ago. Of these, 29 BECs (with active BEAs) in 26 countries agreed to participate in the research. Data was collected with the help of a survey and 13 BECs also undertook optional follow-up interviews. Findings In total, 56 countries and regions have 65 active BEAs with another 17 countries having BE initiatives. The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) excellence model and the Baldrige excellence framework are used by 37.7% and 14.5% of BECs worldwide, respectively. In total, 58.3% of the BECs review their BEFs once every three years or sooner, 100% of the BECs are confident in their BEFs’ fundamental concepts and 96.5% in their categories. There are fewer active BEAs now and the use of BE is potentially decreasing which suggests that more effort is required by the BECs in promoting BE. Originality/value This research collects data directly from the BECs on how BECs design and develop BEFs and provides a general framework for reviewing BEFs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Measuring Business Excellence provides international insights into non-financial ways to measure and manage business performance improvements and company’s value creation dynamics. Measuring Business Excellence will enable you to apply best practice, implement innovative thinking and learn how to use different practices. Learn how to use innovative frameworks, approaches and practices for understanding, assessing and managing the strategic value drivers of business excellence. MBE publishes both rigorous academic research and insightful practical experiences about the development and adoption of assessment and management models, tools and approaches to support excellence and value creation of 21st century organizations both private and public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信