所有索赔均为代表性索赔:对Thomás Zicman de Barros的回应

Q2 Social Sciences

Representation Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI:10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952

Lasse Thomassen

{"title":"所有索赔均为代表性索赔:对Thomás Zicman de Barros的回应","authors":"Lasse Thomassen","doi":"10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This response to Thomás Zicman de Barros argues that so-called post-representative movements do not avoid representation as speaking for. A deconstructive reading of Gayatri Spivak's distinction between Darstellung and Vertretung shows that, while they cannot be reduced to one another, they nonetheless imply one another. As a result, post-representative movements such as the 2013 Brazilian Jornadas de Junho movement do not escape representation as speaking-for.","PeriodicalId":35158,"journal":{"name":"Representation","volume":"58 1","pages":"311 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All Claims Are Representative Claims: Response to Thomás Zicman de Barros\",\"authors\":\"Lasse Thomassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This response to Thomás Zicman de Barros argues that so-called post-representative movements do not avoid representation as speaking for. A deconstructive reading of Gayatri Spivak's distinction between Darstellung and Vertretung shows that, while they cannot be reduced to one another, they nonetheless imply one another. As a result, post-representative movements such as the 2013 Brazilian Jornadas de Junho movement do not escape representation as speaking-for.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Representation\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"311 - 318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Representation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Representation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要：这篇对托马斯·齐克曼·德·巴罗斯的回应认为，所谓的后代表运动并不能避免代表性。对Gayatri Spivak对Darstellong和Vertretung的区分进行解构性解读表明，虽然它们不能被简化为彼此，但它们仍然相互暗示。因此，像2013年巴西的Jornadas de Junho运动这样的后代表运动并没有逃脱代表权的要求。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

All Claims Are Representative Claims: Response to Thomás Zicman de Barros

ABSTRACT This response to Thomás Zicman de Barros argues that so-called post-representative movements do not avoid representation as speaking for. A deconstructive reading of Gayatri Spivak's distinction between Darstellung and Vertretung shows that, while they cannot be reduced to one another, they nonetheless imply one another. As a result, post-representative movements such as the 2013 Brazilian Jornadas de Junho movement do not escape representation as speaking-for.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Representation Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This change in scope follows two paths. Firstly, it seeks contributors who are interested in exploring the interface between democratic practice and theory. In particular, this focus seeks contributions that apply theoretical insights to actual examples of current practice. Secondly, while not neglecting the current focus of the journal, we would like to expand its international coverage so that the journal will offer our readers insights in the state of democracy worldwide.