Pengjun Zhang, Qiang Gao, B. Peng, Lingling Yu, Miao Miao
{"title":"医学科研管理工作者科研诚信认知研究","authors":"Pengjun Zhang, Qiang Gao, B. Peng, Lingling Yu, Miao Miao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo understand the status quo of scientific research integrity cognition and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction among medical research management workers. \n \n \nMethods \nThe questionnaire survey was conducted, 115 management workers for research and education from medical schools, research institutes and hospitals were surveyed, and statistic data analysis was conducted. \n \n \nResults \nThe average score of scientific research management workers' knowledge was (43.09±10.41), and the overall awareness rate was 46.77%; Factors that influencing the cognition of integrity include academic qualifications, professional titles, project hosting or participation, paper publication, paper reviewing, and project/science and technology achievement review experience. The overall satisfaction of the status quo of scientific research integrity construction were 41.65%. Medical research management workers thought that the main factors influencing scientific research integrity in medical field were academic evaluation system (81.74%), social environment (78.26%), personal achievement motivation (76.52%) and self-moral accomplishment (73.04%). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe cognition level of scientific research integrity of medical scientific research management workers is not enough, and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction should be improved. It is suggested to strengthen the training and learning of scientific research integrity knowledge of medical scientific research management workers, and enhance the integrity literacy and concept; departments at all levels working together to strengthen the construction of scientific research integrity, update the academic evaluation mechanism, and cultivate a good cultural atmosphere of scientific research integrity. \n \n \nKey words: \nMedicine; Scientific research management; Scientific research integrity; Cognition; Satisfaction","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"133-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on scientific research integrity cognition of medical scientific research management workers\",\"authors\":\"Pengjun Zhang, Qiang Gao, B. Peng, Lingling Yu, Miao Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo understand the status quo of scientific research integrity cognition and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction among medical research management workers. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe questionnaire survey was conducted, 115 management workers for research and education from medical schools, research institutes and hospitals were surveyed, and statistic data analysis was conducted. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe average score of scientific research management workers' knowledge was (43.09±10.41), and the overall awareness rate was 46.77%; Factors that influencing the cognition of integrity include academic qualifications, professional titles, project hosting or participation, paper publication, paper reviewing, and project/science and technology achievement review experience. The overall satisfaction of the status quo of scientific research integrity construction were 41.65%. Medical research management workers thought that the main factors influencing scientific research integrity in medical field were academic evaluation system (81.74%), social environment (78.26%), personal achievement motivation (76.52%) and self-moral accomplishment (73.04%). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe cognition level of scientific research integrity of medical scientific research management workers is not enough, and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction should be improved. It is suggested to strengthen the training and learning of scientific research integrity knowledge of medical scientific research management workers, and enhance the integrity literacy and concept; departments at all levels working together to strengthen the construction of scientific research integrity, update the academic evaluation mechanism, and cultivate a good cultural atmosphere of scientific research integrity. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nMedicine; Scientific research management; Scientific research integrity; Cognition; Satisfaction\",\"PeriodicalId\":59555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"133-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research on scientific research integrity cognition of medical scientific research management workers
Objective
To understand the status quo of scientific research integrity cognition and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction among medical research management workers.
Methods
The questionnaire survey was conducted, 115 management workers for research and education from medical schools, research institutes and hospitals were surveyed, and statistic data analysis was conducted.
Results
The average score of scientific research management workers' knowledge was (43.09±10.41), and the overall awareness rate was 46.77%; Factors that influencing the cognition of integrity include academic qualifications, professional titles, project hosting or participation, paper publication, paper reviewing, and project/science and technology achievement review experience. The overall satisfaction of the status quo of scientific research integrity construction were 41.65%. Medical research management workers thought that the main factors influencing scientific research integrity in medical field were academic evaluation system (81.74%), social environment (78.26%), personal achievement motivation (76.52%) and self-moral accomplishment (73.04%).
Conclusions
The cognition level of scientific research integrity of medical scientific research management workers is not enough, and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction should be improved. It is suggested to strengthen the training and learning of scientific research integrity knowledge of medical scientific research management workers, and enhance the integrity literacy and concept; departments at all levels working together to strengthen the construction of scientific research integrity, update the academic evaluation mechanism, and cultivate a good cultural atmosphere of scientific research integrity.
Key words:
Medicine; Scientific research management; Scientific research integrity; Cognition; Satisfaction