心脏ct与超声心动图诊断先天性心脏病的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Muhammad Abdullah, Ijaz Hussain, Aruba Nawaz, U. Umer, Zamara Sohail, A. Safi, H. Abid, Mahwish Jabeen
{"title":"心脏ct与超声心动图诊断先天性心脏病的比较","authors":"Muhammad Abdullah, Ijaz Hussain, Aruba Nawaz, U. Umer, Zamara Sohail, A. Safi, H. Abid, Mahwish Jabeen","doi":"10.47144/phj.v56i1.2382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac Computed Tomography (CT) and echocardiography for the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases (CHD) at Rehman Medical Institute (RMI), Peshawar.\nMethodology: We conducted a cross sectional study at Rehman Medical Institute between January 2020 to July 2022. Patients of different ages referred for suspicion of congenital heart diseases were enrolled. The data was collected prospectively which included demographics, Echocardiography findings, CT scan results and procedure notes. Data was analyzed on SPSS the results of descriptive variables expressed as median and percentile. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.\nResults: We included 129 patients, with 73 male and 56 females having age from few days to 18 years. The malformations were divided into intra and extra cardiac groups. 665 malformations were confirmed and analyzed keeping surgical and conventional angiography findings as gold standard. Among these 283 were intra and 99 extra cardiac findings. The echo and CT scan missed 2 and 4 intracardiac anomalies respectively. In case of extracardiac anomalies echo missed 14 anomalies however CT correctly diagnosed all. Both intra and extracardiac results are significant with a p value <0.05.\nConclusion: We conclude that Echocardiography is preferred modality for intracardiac anomalies evident by 99.3% diagnostic accuracy while CTA provides better demonstration of extra cardiac abnormalities having diagnostic accuracy of 99.9%. Echocardiography and CTA are both complementary for assessment and evaluation of congenital heart diseases acting as guide to surgery.","PeriodicalId":42273,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography and Echocardiography for the Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Diseases\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Abdullah, Ijaz Hussain, Aruba Nawaz, U. Umer, Zamara Sohail, A. Safi, H. Abid, Mahwish Jabeen\",\"doi\":\"10.47144/phj.v56i1.2382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac Computed Tomography (CT) and echocardiography for the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases (CHD) at Rehman Medical Institute (RMI), Peshawar.\\nMethodology: We conducted a cross sectional study at Rehman Medical Institute between January 2020 to July 2022. Patients of different ages referred for suspicion of congenital heart diseases were enrolled. The data was collected prospectively which included demographics, Echocardiography findings, CT scan results and procedure notes. Data was analyzed on SPSS the results of descriptive variables expressed as median and percentile. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.\\nResults: We included 129 patients, with 73 male and 56 females having age from few days to 18 years. The malformations were divided into intra and extra cardiac groups. 665 malformations were confirmed and analyzed keeping surgical and conventional angiography findings as gold standard. Among these 283 were intra and 99 extra cardiac findings. The echo and CT scan missed 2 and 4 intracardiac anomalies respectively. In case of extracardiac anomalies echo missed 14 anomalies however CT correctly diagnosed all. Both intra and extracardiac results are significant with a p value <0.05.\\nConclusion: We conclude that Echocardiography is preferred modality for intracardiac anomalies evident by 99.3% diagnostic accuracy while CTA provides better demonstration of extra cardiac abnormalities having diagnostic accuracy of 99.9%. Echocardiography and CTA are both complementary for assessment and evaluation of congenital heart diseases acting as guide to surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v56i1.2382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v56i1.2382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较白沙瓦Rehman医学研究所(RMI)心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声心动图对先天性心脏病(CHD)的诊断准确性。方法:我们于2020年1月至2022年7月在Rehman医学研究所进行了一项横断面研究。研究对象为怀疑患有先天性心脏病的不同年龄的患者。前瞻性地收集资料,包括人口统计学、超声心动图结果、CT扫描结果和手术记录。用SPSS软件对数据进行分析,描述性变量的结果以中位数和百分位数表示。p值<0.05被认为是显著的。结果:我们纳入129例患者,其中男性73例,女性56例,年龄从几天到18岁不等。畸形分为心内组和心外组。以手术和常规血管造影结果为金标准,对665例畸形进行了确诊和分析。其中283例为心脏内病变,99例为心脏外病变。超声和CT扫描分别未发现2例和4例心内异常。心外异常14例回声未见,CT均正确诊断。心内、心外结果均有显著性差异,p值<0.05。结论:超声心动图是心内异常的首选诊断方式,其诊断准确率为99.3%,而CTA对心脏外异常的诊断准确率为99.9%。超声心动图和CTA对先天性心脏病的评估和评价都是互补的,作为手术指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography and Echocardiography for the Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Diseases
Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac Computed Tomography (CT) and echocardiography for the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases (CHD) at Rehman Medical Institute (RMI), Peshawar. Methodology: We conducted a cross sectional study at Rehman Medical Institute between January 2020 to July 2022. Patients of different ages referred for suspicion of congenital heart diseases were enrolled. The data was collected prospectively which included demographics, Echocardiography findings, CT scan results and procedure notes. Data was analyzed on SPSS the results of descriptive variables expressed as median and percentile. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: We included 129 patients, with 73 male and 56 females having age from few days to 18 years. The malformations were divided into intra and extra cardiac groups. 665 malformations were confirmed and analyzed keeping surgical and conventional angiography findings as gold standard. Among these 283 were intra and 99 extra cardiac findings. The echo and CT scan missed 2 and 4 intracardiac anomalies respectively. In case of extracardiac anomalies echo missed 14 anomalies however CT correctly diagnosed all. Both intra and extracardiac results are significant with a p value <0.05. Conclusion: We conclude that Echocardiography is preferred modality for intracardiac anomalies evident by 99.3% diagnostic accuracy while CTA provides better demonstration of extra cardiac abnormalities having diagnostic accuracy of 99.9%. Echocardiography and CTA are both complementary for assessment and evaluation of congenital heart diseases acting as guide to surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Heart Journal
Pakistan Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信