Nurani Pub Date : 2018-02-22 DOI:10.19109/nurani.v17i2.1842
Serlika Aprita
{"title":"ASAS KELANGSUNGAN USAHA SEBAGAI LANDASAN FILOSOFIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI DEBITOR PAILIT SEHUBUNGAN TIDAK ADANYA INSOLVENCY TEST DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN","authors":"Serlika Aprita","doi":"10.19109/nurani.v17i2.1842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its development, the Bankruptcy Law in theory and practice did not progress significantly and it was until 1998 and replaced by a new one, which on October 18, 2004 legalized bankruptcy law and postponement of debt obligations have a wider scope, this is necessary because of the development and legal needs in the community while the provisions that have been applied is not sufficient as a legal means to solve the problem of accounts receivable in a fair, fast, open, and effective. One of them concerning the requirement to declare a bankrupt debtor as stipulated in the provisions of Article 2 paragraph 1 that there is no provision that requires the debtor to be insolvency, this is certainly contrary to the universal philosophy of the Bankruptcy Act that provides a way out for debtors and creditors when the debtor is in a state unable to pay its debts. The absence of this insolvency test shows that the Bankruptcy Act is dominant in protecting the interests of creditors. In order to have a clear philosophical foundation, the concept of business continuity principles should be included in the future Article of Bankruptcy Regulation so as to enable debtor and creditors to pursue debt settlement fairly, quickly, openly and effectively. The type of research in the writing of this journal is prescriptive normative legal research.","PeriodicalId":30942,"journal":{"name":"Nurani","volume":"17 1","pages":"153-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurani","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v17i2.1842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在其发展,破产法在理论和实践中没有显著进展,直到1998年,取而代之的是一个新的,10月18日,2004年破产法合法化和推迟债务有一个更广泛的范围,这是必要的,因为在社区的发展和法律需求规定,应用是不够的法律手段来解决这个问题应收账款在公平、快速、开放、有效的。其中之一是关于第2条第1款规定的宣布破产债务人的要求,没有规定债务人必须资不抵债,这当然违背了破产法的普遍理念,即当债务人处于无力偿还债务的状态时,为债务人和债权人提供出路。这一破产检验的缺失表明《破产法》在保护债权人利益方面占主导地位。为了有一个明确的哲学基础,在未来的破产条例条款中应该纳入业务连续性原则的概念,使债务人和债权人能够公平、快速、公开、有效地寻求债务清偿。本期刊写作的研究类型是规范性法律研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ASAS KELANGSUNGAN USAHA SEBAGAI LANDASAN FILOSOFIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI DEBITOR PAILIT SEHUBUNGAN TIDAK ADANYA INSOLVENCY TEST DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN
In its development, the Bankruptcy Law in theory and practice did not progress significantly and it was until 1998 and replaced by a new one, which on October 18, 2004 legalized bankruptcy law and postponement of debt obligations have a wider scope, this is necessary because of the development and legal needs in the community while the provisions that have been applied is not sufficient as a legal means to solve the problem of accounts receivable in a fair, fast, open, and effective. One of them concerning the requirement to declare a bankrupt debtor as stipulated in the provisions of Article 2 paragraph 1 that there is no provision that requires the debtor to be insolvency, this is certainly contrary to the universal philosophy of the Bankruptcy Act that provides a way out for debtors and creditors when the debtor is in a state unable to pay its debts. The absence of this insolvency test shows that the Bankruptcy Act is dominant in protecting the interests of creditors. In order to have a clear philosophical foundation, the concept of business continuity principles should be included in the future Article of Bankruptcy Regulation so as to enable debtor and creditors to pursue debt settlement fairly, quickly, openly and effectively. The type of research in the writing of this journal is prescriptive normative legal research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信