不同陈化时间对巴厘牛肉感官品质的影响

S. M. O. A., N. L. P. Sriyani, I. Suarta
{"title":"不同陈化时间对巴厘牛肉感官品质的影响","authors":"S. M. O. A., N. L. P. Sriyani, I. Suarta","doi":"10.24843/mip.2021.v24.i02.p05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe objective of the research was to know the optimal length time of bali beef aging in order to produce the best quality of its organoleptic. Analyses used was Non Parametric Kruskal Wallis. If the results significantly different, it will be continued to Mann Whitney analyses. Treatments used were fresh beef without aging (P0), aging beef for 6 hours (P1), aging beef for 8 hours (P2) and aging beef for 10 hours (P3) on the same room temperature (28-29oC). Results showed that beef texture score decreased significantly different (P<0.05) from P0 to P3. The highest beef aromatic and colour of P0 significantly different (P<0.05) compare to the P1, P2, and P3. The tenderness of the P3 was the highest with score for 3.92 and significantly different (P< 0.05) than the P0, P1 and P2. The highest taste was the P2 with score for 3.46 significant different (P<0.05) than the P0, P1 and P3. The highest score of the beef acceptance totally was 4.08 of P1 significantly different (P<0.05) compare to the P0, P2, and P3. It can be concluded that the length time of bali beef aging could affect beef organoleptic and the optimal time to produce the best quality organoleptic of the beef is 6 hours. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":31044,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ORGANOLPTIC QUALITY OF BALI BEEF AGING WITH DIFFERENT LENGTH TIME\",\"authors\":\"S. M. O. A., N. L. P. Sriyani, I. Suarta\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/mip.2021.v24.i02.p05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nThe objective of the research was to know the optimal length time of bali beef aging in order to produce the best quality of its organoleptic. Analyses used was Non Parametric Kruskal Wallis. If the results significantly different, it will be continued to Mann Whitney analyses. Treatments used were fresh beef without aging (P0), aging beef for 6 hours (P1), aging beef for 8 hours (P2) and aging beef for 10 hours (P3) on the same room temperature (28-29oC). Results showed that beef texture score decreased significantly different (P<0.05) from P0 to P3. The highest beef aromatic and colour of P0 significantly different (P<0.05) compare to the P1, P2, and P3. The tenderness of the P3 was the highest with score for 3.92 and significantly different (P< 0.05) than the P0, P1 and P2. The highest taste was the P2 with score for 3.46 significant different (P<0.05) than the P0, P1 and P3. The highest score of the beef acceptance totally was 4.08 of P1 significantly different (P<0.05) compare to the P0, P2, and P3. It can be concluded that the length time of bali beef aging could affect beef organoleptic and the optimal time to produce the best quality organoleptic of the beef is 6 hours. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":31044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/mip.2021.v24.i02.p05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/mip.2021.v24.i02.p05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是了解八里牛肉陈化的最佳时间长度,以生产出最佳的感官品质。使用的分析是非参数Kruskal-Wallis。如果结果有显著差异,将继续进行Mann-Whitney分析。所用的处理是在相同的室温(28-29℃)下,新鲜牛肉不老化(P0)、老化6小时(P1)、老化8小时(P2)和老化10小时(P3)。结果表明,牛肉质地评分从P0到P3有显著性差异(P<0.05)。与P1、P2和P3相比,P0的最高牛肉香气和颜色有显著差异(P<0.05)。P3的压痛最高,评分为3.92,与P0、P1和P2有显著差异(P<0.05)。味觉最高的是P2,其得分为3.46,与P0、P1和P3有显著差异(P<0.05)。牛肉接受度的最高得分为4.08分,与P0、P2和P3相比有显著差异(P<0.05)。结果表明,八里牛肉陈化时间的长短会影响牛肉的感官品质,最佳陈化时间为6小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ORGANOLPTIC QUALITY OF BALI BEEF AGING WITH DIFFERENT LENGTH TIME
The objective of the research was to know the optimal length time of bali beef aging in order to produce the best quality of its organoleptic. Analyses used was Non Parametric Kruskal Wallis. If the results significantly different, it will be continued to Mann Whitney analyses. Treatments used were fresh beef without aging (P0), aging beef for 6 hours (P1), aging beef for 8 hours (P2) and aging beef for 10 hours (P3) on the same room temperature (28-29oC). Results showed that beef texture score decreased significantly different (P<0.05) from P0 to P3. The highest beef aromatic and colour of P0 significantly different (P<0.05) compare to the P1, P2, and P3. The tenderness of the P3 was the highest with score for 3.92 and significantly different (P< 0.05) than the P0, P1 and P2. The highest taste was the P2 with score for 3.46 significant different (P<0.05) than the P0, P1 and P3. The highest score of the beef acceptance totally was 4.08 of P1 significantly different (P<0.05) compare to the P0, P2, and P3. It can be concluded that the length time of bali beef aging could affect beef organoleptic and the optimal time to produce the best quality organoleptic of the beef is 6 hours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信