缉毒局关于阿亚瓦斯卡风险的报告：为禁令服务的“科学”？

IF 2.2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

Journal of Psychedelic Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1556/2054.2023.00279

B. Labate, A. Ermakova, Jordan Sloshower, N. Galvão-Coelho, Fernanda Palhano-Fontes, Henrique Fernandes Antunes, Glauber Loures de Assis, Clancy Cavnar, D. D. de Araujo, S. Ribeiro

{"title":"缉毒局关于阿亚瓦斯卡风险的报告：为禁令服务的“科学”？","authors":"B. Labate, A. Ermakova, Jordan Sloshower, N. Galvão-Coelho, Fernanda Palhano-Fontes, Henrique Fernandes Antunes, Glauber Loures de Assis, Clancy Cavnar, D. D. de Araujo, S. Ribeiro","doi":"10.1556/2054.2023.00279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On February 2023, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) released a document to the legal team representing the Church of the Eagle and the Condor (“CEC”). This disclosure came two years after the church, in conjunction with Chacruna Institute, submitted two FOIA requests to the DEA and the Department of Justice requesting all records pertaining to ayahuasca. This report, titled “Ayahuasca: Risks to Public Health and Safety,” was issued in July 2020. In the present article, we challenge a number of claims made in the DEA report and highlight significant factual omissions, theoretical biases, and misinterpretations of existing data. We will demonstrate that the DEA report severely downplays the safety profile and therapeutic potential of ayahuasca and overemphasizes the risks. It also fails to include current research on ayahuasca demonstrating its potential benefits.","PeriodicalId":34732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychedelic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The DEA report on ayahuasca risks: “Science” in service of prohibition?\",\"authors\":\"B. Labate, A. Ermakova, Jordan Sloshower, N. Galvão-Coelho, Fernanda Palhano-Fontes, Henrique Fernandes Antunes, Glauber Loures de Assis, Clancy Cavnar, D. D. de Araujo, S. Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/2054.2023.00279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On February 2023, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) released a document to the legal team representing the Church of the Eagle and the Condor (“CEC”). This disclosure came two years after the church, in conjunction with Chacruna Institute, submitted two FOIA requests to the DEA and the Department of Justice requesting all records pertaining to ayahuasca. This report, titled “Ayahuasca: Risks to Public Health and Safety,” was issued in July 2020. In the present article, we challenge a number of claims made in the DEA report and highlight significant factual omissions, theoretical biases, and misinterpretations of existing data. We will demonstrate that the DEA report severely downplays the safety profile and therapeutic potential of ayahuasca and overemphasizes the risks. It also fails to include current research on ayahuasca demonstrating its potential benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychedelic Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychedelic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2023.00279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychedelic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2023.00279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2023年2月，缉毒局向代表鹰与秃鹰教会（“CEC”）的法律团队发布了一份文件。两年前，教会与查克鲁纳研究所一起向缉毒局和司法部提交了两份《信息自由法》请求，要求提供与阿亚瓦斯卡有关的所有记录。这份题为《阿亚瓦斯卡：公共健康和安全风险》的报告于2020年7月发布。在本文中，我们对缉毒局报告中的一些说法提出了质疑，并强调了对现有数据的重大事实遗漏、理论偏见和误解。我们将证明，缉毒局的报告严重淡化了阿亚瓦斯卡的安全性和治疗潜力，并过度强调了风险。它也没有包括目前对阿亚瓦斯卡的研究，证明其潜在的好处。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The DEA report on ayahuasca risks: “Science” in service of prohibition?

On February 2023, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) released a document to the legal team representing the Church of the Eagle and the Condor (“CEC”). This disclosure came two years after the church, in conjunction with Chacruna Institute, submitted two FOIA requests to the DEA and the Department of Justice requesting all records pertaining to ayahuasca. This report, titled “Ayahuasca: Risks to Public Health and Safety,” was issued in July 2020. In the present article, we challenge a number of claims made in the DEA report and highlight significant factual omissions, theoretical biases, and misinterpretations of existing data. We will demonstrate that the DEA report severely downplays the safety profile and therapeutic potential of ayahuasca and overemphasizes the risks. It also fails to include current research on ayahuasca demonstrating its potential benefits.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Psychedelic Studies Social Sciences-Anthropology

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

8.90%

发文量

审稿时长

26 weeks