通过赌博途径问卷测量途径模型:意大利版本的心理测量特性

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
C. Primi, M. Donati, O. Casciani, O. De Luca, D. Capitanucci, R. Smaniotto, S. Cabrini, M. Avanzi, A. Fiorin, G. Bellio, L. Giachero, A. Baselice, A. Iozzi, G. Iraci Sareri, L. Nower
{"title":"通过赌博途径问卷测量途径模型:意大利版本的心理测量特性","authors":"C. Primi, M. Donati, O. Casciani, O. De Luca, D. Capitanucci, R. Smaniotto, S. Cabrini, M. Avanzi, A. Fiorin, G. Bellio, L. Giachero, A. Baselice, A. Iozzi, G. Iraci Sareri, L. Nower","doi":"10.1080/14459795.2022.2077975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the last decade, gambling opportunities worldwide have increased significantly, providing continual access to more people. Thus, standardized measures to assess various facets of Gambling Disorder and holistic approaches to identifying sub-groups of disordered gamblers are needed. The Gambling Pathways Questionnaire (GPQ), based on the Pathways Model of problem gambling, is designed to assign gamblers to subtypes at intake and identify a variety of salient etiological factors. This study sought to validate the Italian version of the GPQ. After the translation and adaptation of the scale to the Italian language and culture, the GPQ was administered to 490 treatment-seeking disordered gamblers (84% males, M age = 43.77, SD = 13.25) who attended 54 treatment centers distributed across all of Italy. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the six-factor structure and internal coherence coefficients showed good to very good reliability. Moreover, cluster analysis revealed that the three-cluster solution produced the best model fit, which generally corresponded with the Pathways Model. The Italian version of the GPQ evidenced good psychometric properties, and the Italian-adapted scoring corresponds to the cluster analysis.","PeriodicalId":47301,"journal":{"name":"International Gambling Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the pathways model through the gambling pathways questionnaire: the psychometric properties of the Italian version\",\"authors\":\"C. Primi, M. Donati, O. Casciani, O. De Luca, D. Capitanucci, R. Smaniotto, S. Cabrini, M. Avanzi, A. Fiorin, G. Bellio, L. Giachero, A. Baselice, A. Iozzi, G. Iraci Sareri, L. Nower\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14459795.2022.2077975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Over the last decade, gambling opportunities worldwide have increased significantly, providing continual access to more people. Thus, standardized measures to assess various facets of Gambling Disorder and holistic approaches to identifying sub-groups of disordered gamblers are needed. The Gambling Pathways Questionnaire (GPQ), based on the Pathways Model of problem gambling, is designed to assign gamblers to subtypes at intake and identify a variety of salient etiological factors. This study sought to validate the Italian version of the GPQ. After the translation and adaptation of the scale to the Italian language and culture, the GPQ was administered to 490 treatment-seeking disordered gamblers (84% males, M age = 43.77, SD = 13.25) who attended 54 treatment centers distributed across all of Italy. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the six-factor structure and internal coherence coefficients showed good to very good reliability. Moreover, cluster analysis revealed that the three-cluster solution produced the best model fit, which generally corresponded with the Pathways Model. The Italian version of the GPQ evidenced good psychometric properties, and the Italian-adapted scoring corresponds to the cluster analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Gambling Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Gambling Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2022.2077975\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Gambling Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2022.2077975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在过去的十年里,全球范围内的赌博机会显著增加,为更多的人提供了持续的机会。因此,需要采取标准化措施来评估赌博障碍的各个方面,并采取整体方法来识别无序赌徒的亚群体。赌博途径问卷(GPQ)基于问题赌博的途径模型,旨在将赌徒分为摄入时的亚型,并确定各种显著的病因。这项研究试图验证意大利版的GPQ。在将量表翻译并适应意大利语言和文化后,对490名寻求治疗的精神障碍赌徒(84%为男性,M年龄=43.77,SD=13.25)进行了GPQ,他们参加了分布在意大利各地的54个治疗中心。验证性因子分析(CFA)支持六因子结构,内部相干系数显示出良好到非常好的可靠性。此外,聚类分析表明,三个聚类的解决方案产生了最佳的模型拟合,通常与路径模型相对应。意大利版的GPQ证明了良好的心理测量特性,意大利版的评分与聚类分析相对应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the pathways model through the gambling pathways questionnaire: the psychometric properties of the Italian version
ABSTRACT Over the last decade, gambling opportunities worldwide have increased significantly, providing continual access to more people. Thus, standardized measures to assess various facets of Gambling Disorder and holistic approaches to identifying sub-groups of disordered gamblers are needed. The Gambling Pathways Questionnaire (GPQ), based on the Pathways Model of problem gambling, is designed to assign gamblers to subtypes at intake and identify a variety of salient etiological factors. This study sought to validate the Italian version of the GPQ. After the translation and adaptation of the scale to the Italian language and culture, the GPQ was administered to 490 treatment-seeking disordered gamblers (84% males, M age = 43.77, SD = 13.25) who attended 54 treatment centers distributed across all of Italy. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the six-factor structure and internal coherence coefficients showed good to very good reliability. Moreover, cluster analysis revealed that the three-cluster solution produced the best model fit, which generally corresponded with the Pathways Model. The Italian version of the GPQ evidenced good psychometric properties, and the Italian-adapted scoring corresponds to the cluster analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信