参与模式能否替代P - scale评估系统?

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Tereza Aidonopoulou‐Read
{"title":"参与模式能否替代P - scale评估系统?","authors":"Tereza Aidonopoulou‐Read","doi":"10.1111/1467-9604.12354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Engagement Model was launched in January 2020, endeavouring to address the weaknesses of the P- scales assessment for students not yet involved in a subject- specific curriculum. This paper will discuss how and if the tensions between previously adopted assessment systems as discussed in teacher interviews can be reconciled through the Engagement Model in relation to students with autism and severe learning difficulties. The interview findings suggested that some of the problems with assessment, when applied in this context, are related to consistency and transferability, lack of formal recognition of non- academic progress, familiarity with the students, observation skills and training, workload and time, and subjectivity of judgement amongst professionals. When compared with the aims of the Engagement Model, the findings of the research suggest that even though it addresses some of the issues raised, it cannot act as a substitute to the P- scale system as it serves a different purpose.","PeriodicalId":46086,"journal":{"name":"Support for Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-9604.12354","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the Engagement Model act as a replacement for the P‐scale assessment system?\",\"authors\":\"Tereza Aidonopoulou‐Read\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9604.12354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Engagement Model was launched in January 2020, endeavouring to address the weaknesses of the P- scales assessment for students not yet involved in a subject- specific curriculum. This paper will discuss how and if the tensions between previously adopted assessment systems as discussed in teacher interviews can be reconciled through the Engagement Model in relation to students with autism and severe learning difficulties. The interview findings suggested that some of the problems with assessment, when applied in this context, are related to consistency and transferability, lack of formal recognition of non- academic progress, familiarity with the students, observation skills and training, workload and time, and subjectivity of judgement amongst professionals. When compared with the aims of the Engagement Model, the findings of the research suggest that even though it addresses some of the issues raised, it cannot act as a substitute to the P- scale system as it serves a different purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Support for Learning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-9604.12354\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Support for Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Support for Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

参与模式于2020年1月启动,旨在为尚未参与特定学科课程的学生解决P级评估的弱点。本文将讨论在教师访谈中讨论的以前采用的评估系统之间的紧张关系如何以及是否可以通过与自闭症和严重学习困难的学生有关的参与模型来协调。访谈结果表明,在这种情况下,评估的一些问题与一致性和可转移性、缺乏对非学术进展的正式认可、对学生的熟悉程度、观察技能和训练、工作量和时间以及专业人员判断的主观性有关。当与参与模式的目标进行比较时,研究结果表明,尽管它解决了所提出的一些问题,但它不能作为P量表系统的替代品,因为它的目的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can the Engagement Model act as a replacement for the P‐scale assessment system?
The Engagement Model was launched in January 2020, endeavouring to address the weaknesses of the P- scales assessment for students not yet involved in a subject- specific curriculum. This paper will discuss how and if the tensions between previously adopted assessment systems as discussed in teacher interviews can be reconciled through the Engagement Model in relation to students with autism and severe learning difficulties. The interview findings suggested that some of the problems with assessment, when applied in this context, are related to consistency and transferability, lack of formal recognition of non- academic progress, familiarity with the students, observation skills and training, workload and time, and subjectivity of judgement amongst professionals. When compared with the aims of the Engagement Model, the findings of the research suggest that even though it addresses some of the issues raised, it cannot act as a substitute to the P- scale system as it serves a different purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Support for Learning
Support for Learning EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The articles in this journal examine the practical and theoretical issues surrounding the education of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools. Support for Learning aims to act as a bridge between academics and practitioners. All aspects of curriculum delivery, classroom management and the use of support services are covered. Strategies to eliminate underachievement and promote best practice are especially featured. Most, but not all, issues of Support for Learning, focus on a topical theme. The journal is widely read in the UK and overseas as an authoritative guide to the current state of SEN policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信