普埃布拉地区Isste医院细菌性阴道病诊断方法的评价

IF 0.4 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Guadalupe Jiménez-Flores, Jesús Flores-Tlalpa, A. Ruiz-Tagle, Claudy Lorena Villagrán-Padilla
{"title":"普埃布拉地区Isste医院细菌性阴道病诊断方法的评价","authors":"Guadalupe Jiménez-Flores, Jesús Flores-Tlalpa, A. Ruiz-Tagle, Claudy Lorena Villagrán-Padilla","doi":"10.29059/cienciauat.v14i2.1296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of reproductive age. The diagnosis can be ma de by applying clinical criteria or by the eva-luation of bacterial morphotypes present in Gram stain performed to vaginal secretion or by microbiological procedures, which were deve loped as an alternative to clinical diagnosis, gradually replacing it. The objective of this work was to determine the effectiveness of the Amsel and Ison-Hay methods, used for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis using the Nugent method as a standard. In this study, 3 05 samples of vaginal discharge from pa tients of the ISSSTE Puebla Regional Hospital were analyzed. The samples were processed and analyzed for the diagnosis of BV following the recommendations of the Amsel, Nugent and Ison-Hay methods. The analysis of the results indicated 12.8 % by Nugent, 31.1 % of BV by the Amsel method and 36.7 % by Ison-Hay; suggesting that both techniques show a high rate of false positives. The sensitivity for the Amsel and Ison-Hay method was 97.44 %, the specificity was 78.57 % and 72.18 % for Amsel and Ison-Hay, respectively. In conclusion, given the results obtained and the minimal differences between the analyzed methods, it is recommended to perform the Amsel criteria, followed by the observation of Gram staining of the vaginal flow for the assessment of the microbiota by the Ison-Hay method, to have a better diagnosis of BV, when the Nugent method is not used.","PeriodicalId":42451,"journal":{"name":"CienciaUat","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de los métodos utilizados para el diagnóstico de vaginosis bacteriana en el Hospital Regional ISSSTE Puebla\",\"authors\":\"Guadalupe Jiménez-Flores, Jesús Flores-Tlalpa, A. Ruiz-Tagle, Claudy Lorena Villagrán-Padilla\",\"doi\":\"10.29059/cienciauat.v14i2.1296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"of reproductive age. The diagnosis can be ma de by applying clinical criteria or by the eva-luation of bacterial morphotypes present in Gram stain performed to vaginal secretion or by microbiological procedures, which were deve loped as an alternative to clinical diagnosis, gradually replacing it. The objective of this work was to determine the effectiveness of the Amsel and Ison-Hay methods, used for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis using the Nugent method as a standard. In this study, 3 05 samples of vaginal discharge from pa tients of the ISSSTE Puebla Regional Hospital were analyzed. The samples were processed and analyzed for the diagnosis of BV following the recommendations of the Amsel, Nugent and Ison-Hay methods. The analysis of the results indicated 12.8 % by Nugent, 31.1 % of BV by the Amsel method and 36.7 % by Ison-Hay; suggesting that both techniques show a high rate of false positives. The sensitivity for the Amsel and Ison-Hay method was 97.44 %, the specificity was 78.57 % and 72.18 % for Amsel and Ison-Hay, respectively. In conclusion, given the results obtained and the minimal differences between the analyzed methods, it is recommended to perform the Amsel criteria, followed by the observation of Gram staining of the vaginal flow for the assessment of the microbiota by the Ison-Hay method, to have a better diagnosis of BV, when the Nugent method is not used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CienciaUat\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CienciaUat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29059/cienciauat.v14i2.1296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CienciaUat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29059/cienciauat.v14i2.1296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

生育年龄的。诊断可以通过应用临床标准或通过评估阴道分泌物革兰氏染色中存在的细菌形态或通过微生物学程序进行,这些程序被开发为临床诊断的替代方法,并逐渐取代临床诊断。这项工作的目的是确定Amsel和Ison-Hay方法的有效性,用于诊断细菌性阴道病,使用纽金特方法作为标准。在这项研究中,分析了来自ISSSTE Puebla地区医院患者的305份阴道分泌物样本。根据Amsel、Nugent和Ison-Hay推荐的方法对样本进行处理和分析,以诊断BV。分析结果显示,Nugent法占12.8%,Amsel法占31.1%,Ison-Hay法占36.7%;这表明两种技术都显示出很高的误报率。Amsel法和Ison-Hay法的敏感性分别为97.44%,特异性分别为78.57%和72.18%。综上所述,考虑到所获得的结果和分析方法之间的差异很小,建议在不使用Nugent法的情况下,采用Amsel标准,然后观察阴道流革兰氏染色,用Ison-Hay法评估微生物群,以更好地诊断BV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluación de los métodos utilizados para el diagnóstico de vaginosis bacteriana en el Hospital Regional ISSSTE Puebla
of reproductive age. The diagnosis can be ma de by applying clinical criteria or by the eva-luation of bacterial morphotypes present in Gram stain performed to vaginal secretion or by microbiological procedures, which were deve loped as an alternative to clinical diagnosis, gradually replacing it. The objective of this work was to determine the effectiveness of the Amsel and Ison-Hay methods, used for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis using the Nugent method as a standard. In this study, 3 05 samples of vaginal discharge from pa tients of the ISSSTE Puebla Regional Hospital were analyzed. The samples were processed and analyzed for the diagnosis of BV following the recommendations of the Amsel, Nugent and Ison-Hay methods. The analysis of the results indicated 12.8 % by Nugent, 31.1 % of BV by the Amsel method and 36.7 % by Ison-Hay; suggesting that both techniques show a high rate of false positives. The sensitivity for the Amsel and Ison-Hay method was 97.44 %, the specificity was 78.57 % and 72.18 % for Amsel and Ison-Hay, respectively. In conclusion, given the results obtained and the minimal differences between the analyzed methods, it is recommended to perform the Amsel criteria, followed by the observation of Gram staining of the vaginal flow for the assessment of the microbiota by the Ison-Hay method, to have a better diagnosis of BV, when the Nugent method is not used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CienciaUat
CienciaUat MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信