贝利民主警务的六个关键要素:评估亚美尼亚、格鲁吉亚和乌克兰的捐助者援助改革

IF 1.1 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
R. Peacock
{"title":"贝利民主警务的六个关键要素:评估亚美尼亚、格鲁吉亚和乌克兰的捐助者援助改革","authors":"R. Peacock","doi":"10.1080/01924036.2021.1899003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT David Bayley’s pioneering book “Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Police Abroad” provided scholars and practitioners across the globe with strategies found most effective in supporting police reform in developing countries. This article re-examines Bayley’s six critical elements of developing democratic policing through the lens of the reform processes in Georgia, Ukraine, and Armenia. This cross-case comparison demonstrated that contemporary reform programmes are largely supportive of the six key strategies proposed in Changing the Guard. Specifically, Bayley’s recommendations on finding the right officers and focusing on fair procedures as perceived by citizens were predictive of the success and failure of reform in Georgia, Ukraine, and Armenia. Moreover, Georgian and Ukrainian reform over the last decade appear to have reached the limits to their narrow approach towards democratic policing by not prioritising Bayley’s calls for independent police oversight or leadership training for management.","PeriodicalId":45887,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01924036.2021.1899003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayley’s six critical elements of democratic policing: evaluating donor-assisted reform in Armenia, Georgia, and Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"R. Peacock\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01924036.2021.1899003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT David Bayley’s pioneering book “Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Police Abroad” provided scholars and practitioners across the globe with strategies found most effective in supporting police reform in developing countries. This article re-examines Bayley’s six critical elements of developing democratic policing through the lens of the reform processes in Georgia, Ukraine, and Armenia. This cross-case comparison demonstrated that contemporary reform programmes are largely supportive of the six key strategies proposed in Changing the Guard. Specifically, Bayley’s recommendations on finding the right officers and focusing on fair procedures as perceived by citizens were predictive of the success and failure of reform in Georgia, Ukraine, and Armenia. Moreover, Georgian and Ukrainian reform over the last decade appear to have reached the limits to their narrow approach towards democratic policing by not prioritising Bayley’s calls for independent police oversight or leadership training for management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01924036.2021.1899003\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2021.1899003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2021.1899003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

David Bayley的开创性著作《换岗:在国外发展民主警察》为全球的学者和从业人员提供了支持发展中国家警察改革的最有效策略。本文以格鲁吉亚、乌克兰和亚美尼亚的改革进程为视角,重新审视贝利提出的发展民主警务的六个关键要素。这种跨案例比较表明,当代改革方案在很大程度上支持《换岗》中提出的六项关键战略。具体来说,贝利关于寻找合适的官员和关注公民认为的公平程序的建议预示了格鲁吉亚、乌克兰和亚美尼亚改革的成败。此外,格鲁吉亚和乌克兰在过去十年中的改革似乎已经达到了民主警务狭隘做法的极限,因为它们没有优先考虑贝利呼吁的独立警察监督或对管理人员进行领导培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bayley’s six critical elements of democratic policing: evaluating donor-assisted reform in Armenia, Georgia, and Ukraine
ABSTRACT David Bayley’s pioneering book “Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Police Abroad” provided scholars and practitioners across the globe with strategies found most effective in supporting police reform in developing countries. This article re-examines Bayley’s six critical elements of developing democratic policing through the lens of the reform processes in Georgia, Ukraine, and Armenia. This cross-case comparison demonstrated that contemporary reform programmes are largely supportive of the six key strategies proposed in Changing the Guard. Specifically, Bayley’s recommendations on finding the right officers and focusing on fair procedures as perceived by citizens were predictive of the success and failure of reform in Georgia, Ukraine, and Armenia. Moreover, Georgian and Ukrainian reform over the last decade appear to have reached the limits to their narrow approach towards democratic policing by not prioritising Bayley’s calls for independent police oversight or leadership training for management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信