分析选定的公用事业公司将燃料成本和风险转嫁给客户

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Godfred Gakpetor, Maggie Shober
{"title":"分析选定的公用事业公司将燃料成本和风险转嫁给客户","authors":"Godfred Gakpetor,&nbsp;Maggie Shober","doi":"10.1002/ep.14167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An electric utility bill often includes a fuel adjustment clause (FAC) charge that can be changed up or down to recoup the utility's fuel costs. The fuel adjustment clause was first introduced after fluctuations in coal prices during World War 1. The continued use of the FAC, which shifts the risk of fuel price spikes to the customer, is particularly concerning where energy burdens for vulnerable residents are high. To estimate the impact of an increase in natural gas prices on residential electricity bills because of the rise in the use of gas to generate energy in recent years. In 2020, electricity production accounted for around 33% of gas usage. One approach to address the high-energy burden is providing clean and efficient energy for households, reducing energy bills, and freeing up household resources for other necessities. To determine this; first, a few utilities were selected, then the residential rate schedules were examined so a model could be built to calculate the bill based on a range of usage levels. The selected utilities, Florida Power &amp; Light, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Progress, and Duke Energy Carolinas, all rely on different fuel mixes to serve customers. Our findings suggest that with a heavy reliance on gas and a direct pass-through of gas prices to customers, customers bear the risks of the volatile gas market. A slight increase in electric bills can have an outsized impact on customers, particularly low-income households and individuals on fixed incomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of select utilities passing fuel costs and risks onto customers\",\"authors\":\"Godfred Gakpetor,&nbsp;Maggie Shober\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ep.14167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>An electric utility bill often includes a fuel adjustment clause (FAC) charge that can be changed up or down to recoup the utility's fuel costs. The fuel adjustment clause was first introduced after fluctuations in coal prices during World War 1. The continued use of the FAC, which shifts the risk of fuel price spikes to the customer, is particularly concerning where energy burdens for vulnerable residents are high. To estimate the impact of an increase in natural gas prices on residential electricity bills because of the rise in the use of gas to generate energy in recent years. In 2020, electricity production accounted for around 33% of gas usage. One approach to address the high-energy burden is providing clean and efficient energy for households, reducing energy bills, and freeing up household resources for other necessities. To determine this; first, a few utilities were selected, then the residential rate schedules were examined so a model could be built to calculate the bill based on a range of usage levels. The selected utilities, Florida Power &amp; Light, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Progress, and Duke Energy Carolinas, all rely on different fuel mixes to serve customers. Our findings suggest that with a heavy reliance on gas and a direct pass-through of gas prices to customers, customers bear the risks of the volatile gas market. A slight increase in electric bills can have an outsized impact on customers, particularly low-income households and individuals on fixed incomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电费账单通常包括燃料调整条款(FAC)费用,该费用可以上调或下调,以弥补电力公司的燃料成本。燃料调整条款是在第一次世界大战期间煤炭价格波动后首次引入的。FAC的继续使用,将燃料价格飙升的风险转移给了客户,这在脆弱居民的能源负担高的地方尤其令人担忧。估计由于近年来使用天然气发电的人数增加,天然气价格上涨对居民电费的影响。2020年,电力生产约占天然气使用量的33%。解决高能源负担的一个方法是为家庭提供清洁和高效的能源,减少能源账单,并腾出家庭资源用于其他必需品。确定这个;首先,选择一些公用事业公司,然后检查住宅费率表,以便建立一个模型,根据使用水平的范围计算账单。被选中的公用事业公司,佛罗里达电力与照明公司、杜克能源佛罗里达公司、杜克能源进步公司和杜克能源卡罗来纳公司,都依靠不同的燃料组合为客户服务。我们的研究结果表明,由于对天然气的严重依赖以及天然气价格直接传递给客户,客户承担了天然气市场波动的风险。电费的小幅上涨会对消费者产生巨大的影响,尤其是低收入家庭和固定收入的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of select utilities passing fuel costs and risks onto customers

An electric utility bill often includes a fuel adjustment clause (FAC) charge that can be changed up or down to recoup the utility's fuel costs. The fuel adjustment clause was first introduced after fluctuations in coal prices during World War 1. The continued use of the FAC, which shifts the risk of fuel price spikes to the customer, is particularly concerning where energy burdens for vulnerable residents are high. To estimate the impact of an increase in natural gas prices on residential electricity bills because of the rise in the use of gas to generate energy in recent years. In 2020, electricity production accounted for around 33% of gas usage. One approach to address the high-energy burden is providing clean and efficient energy for households, reducing energy bills, and freeing up household resources for other necessities. To determine this; first, a few utilities were selected, then the residential rate schedules were examined so a model could be built to calculate the bill based on a range of usage levels. The selected utilities, Florida Power & Light, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Progress, and Duke Energy Carolinas, all rely on different fuel mixes to serve customers. Our findings suggest that with a heavy reliance on gas and a direct pass-through of gas prices to customers, customers bear the risks of the volatile gas market. A slight increase in electric bills can have an outsized impact on customers, particularly low-income households and individuals on fixed incomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信