Jacob Steere Williams的《肮脏的疾病:伤寒和维多利亚时代英格兰的流行病学实践》(综述)

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
P. Gilbert
{"title":"Jacob Steere Williams的《肮脏的疾病:伤寒和维多利亚时代英格兰的流行病学实践》(综述)","authors":"P. Gilbert","doi":"10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, public health practitioners have located the origins of epidemiology in Britain in the mid-nineteenth century, with John Snow’s famous study of the 1854 London cholera epidem‐ ic. His spatial analysis implicating the Broad Street Pump and the Southern and Vauxhall Water Com‐ pany is often seen as a work of unparalleled in‐ spiration and heroic scientific genius. However, in The Filth Disease: Typhoid Fever and the Practices of Epidemiology in Victorian England, historian Jacob Steere-Williams unveils a vibrant world of Victorian epidemiological practice and emerging professionalization far more expansive than this traditional narrative suggests. In this engaging look at nineteenth-century British public health, Steere-Williams explores the origins of the field of epidemiology, looking to high-profile and explos‐ ive epidemics of typhoid fever to trace how epi‐ demiological practice formed, how its boundaries were negotiated, and how evolving theories of transmission and investigative practices shaped etiologies of typhoid. Crucial to this analysis is Steere-Williams’s methodical examination of the extensive Medical Officer of Health Reports pro‐ duced by urban and rural sanitary officials in their search for the index case in outbreaks of the “Filth Disease.” Through these reports and SteereWilliams’s sharp analysis, the dual role of typhoid in public health becomes evident: first, as a lens through which to examine the changing nature of public health and the emergence of epidemiology as a unified profession; and second, as a model disease, shaping epidemiological practice, public health epistemology, and urban and rural concep‐ tions of cleanliness and filth during the same peri‐ od.","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"64 1","pages":"505 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Filth Disease: Typhoid Fever and the Practices of Epidemiology in Victorian England by Jacob Steere-Williams (review)\",\"authors\":\"P. Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For decades, public health practitioners have located the origins of epidemiology in Britain in the mid-nineteenth century, with John Snow’s famous study of the 1854 London cholera epidem‐ ic. His spatial analysis implicating the Broad Street Pump and the Southern and Vauxhall Water Com‐ pany is often seen as a work of unparalleled in‐ spiration and heroic scientific genius. However, in The Filth Disease: Typhoid Fever and the Practices of Epidemiology in Victorian England, historian Jacob Steere-Williams unveils a vibrant world of Victorian epidemiological practice and emerging professionalization far more expansive than this traditional narrative suggests. In this engaging look at nineteenth-century British public health, Steere-Williams explores the origins of the field of epidemiology, looking to high-profile and explos‐ ive epidemics of typhoid fever to trace how epi‐ demiological practice formed, how its boundaries were negotiated, and how evolving theories of transmission and investigative practices shaped etiologies of typhoid. Crucial to this analysis is Steere-Williams’s methodical examination of the extensive Medical Officer of Health Reports pro‐ duced by urban and rural sanitary officials in their search for the index case in outbreaks of the “Filth Disease.” Through these reports and SteereWilliams’s sharp analysis, the dual role of typhoid in public health becomes evident: first, as a lens through which to examine the changing nature of public health and the emergence of epidemiology as a unified profession; and second, as a model disease, shaping epidemiological practice, public health epistemology, and urban and rural concep‐ tions of cleanliness and filth during the same peri‐ od.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VICTORIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"505 - 506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VICTORIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.28\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.28","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,公共卫生从业者一直在寻找19世纪中期英国流行病学的起源,约翰·斯诺对1854年伦敦霍乱流行进行了著名的研究。他对布罗德街水泵公司、南部和沃克斯豪尔水务公司的空间分析经常被视为无与伦比的灵感和英雄般的科学天才。然而,历史学家雅各布·斯蒂尔·威廉姆斯(Jacob Steere Williams)在《肮脏的疾病:伤寒和维多利亚时代英格兰的流行病学实践》(The Filth Disease:Typhoid Fever and The Practices of Epidemiology in Victoria England)一书中揭示了一个充满活力的维多利亚时代流行病学实践和新兴职业化的世界,其范围远比传统叙事所暗示的要广。在这篇引人入胜的关于19世纪英国公共卫生的文章中,斯蒂尔·威廉姆斯探索了流行病学领域的起源,着眼于备受瞩目的伤寒流行,以追踪流行病实践是如何形成的,其边界是如何协商的,以及传播理论和调查实践的演变如何影响伤寒的病因。对这一分析至关重要的是,斯蒂尔·威廉姆斯有条不紊地检查了城市和农村卫生官员在寻找“费思病”爆发的指数病例时编制的大量卫生官员报告。通过这些报告和斯蒂尔·威廉姆斯的尖锐分析,伤寒在公共卫生中的双重作用变得显而易见:首先,作为一个镜头,通过它来审视公共卫生性质的变化和流行病学作为一个统一专业的出现;其次,作为一种模式疾病,在同一时期形成了流行病学实践、公共卫生认识论以及城市和农村对清洁和肮脏的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Filth Disease: Typhoid Fever and the Practices of Epidemiology in Victorian England by Jacob Steere-Williams (review)
For decades, public health practitioners have located the origins of epidemiology in Britain in the mid-nineteenth century, with John Snow’s famous study of the 1854 London cholera epidem‐ ic. His spatial analysis implicating the Broad Street Pump and the Southern and Vauxhall Water Com‐ pany is often seen as a work of unparalleled in‐ spiration and heroic scientific genius. However, in The Filth Disease: Typhoid Fever and the Practices of Epidemiology in Victorian England, historian Jacob Steere-Williams unveils a vibrant world of Victorian epidemiological practice and emerging professionalization far more expansive than this traditional narrative suggests. In this engaging look at nineteenth-century British public health, Steere-Williams explores the origins of the field of epidemiology, looking to high-profile and explos‐ ive epidemics of typhoid fever to trace how epi‐ demiological practice formed, how its boundaries were negotiated, and how evolving theories of transmission and investigative practices shaped etiologies of typhoid. Crucial to this analysis is Steere-Williams’s methodical examination of the extensive Medical Officer of Health Reports pro‐ duced by urban and rural sanitary officials in their search for the index case in outbreaks of the “Filth Disease.” Through these reports and SteereWilliams’s sharp analysis, the dual role of typhoid in public health becomes evident: first, as a lens through which to examine the changing nature of public health and the emergence of epidemiology as a unified profession; and second, as a model disease, shaping epidemiological practice, public health epistemology, and urban and rural concep‐ tions of cleanliness and filth during the same peri‐ od.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VICTORIAN STUDIES
VICTORIAN STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For more than 50 years, Victorian Studies has been devoted to the study of British culture of the Victorian age. It regularly includes interdisciplinary articles on comparative literature, social and political history, and the histories of education, philosophy, fine arts, economics, law and science, as well as review essays, and an extensive book review section. An annual cumulative and fully searchable bibliography of noteworthy publications that have a bearing on the Victorian period is available electronically and is included in the cost of a subscription. Victorian Studies Online Bibliography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信