中国胎儿生长:基于胎儿超声测量的多中心队列研究

X. Gong, Tianchen Wu, Xiaoli Wang, Lizhen Zhang, Yiping You, Hongwei Wei, Xifang Zuo, Ying Zhou, Xinli Xing, Zhaoyan Meng, Q. Lyu, ZhaoDong Liu, Jian Zhang, Liyan Hu, Junnan Li, Li Li, Chulin Chen, Chunyan Liu, Guoqiang Sun, Aiju Liu, Jingsi Chen, Y. Lyu, Yuan Wei, Yangyu Zhao
{"title":"中国胎儿生长:基于胎儿超声测量的多中心队列研究","authors":"X. Gong, Tianchen Wu, Xiaoli Wang, Lizhen Zhang, Yiping You, Hongwei Wei, Xifang Zuo, Ying Zhou, Xinli Xing, Zhaoyan Meng, Q. Lyu, ZhaoDong Liu, Jian Zhang, Liyan Hu, Junnan Li, Li Li, Chulin Chen, Chunyan Liu, Guoqiang Sun, Aiju Liu, Jingsi Chen, Y. Lyu, Yuan Wei, Yangyu Zhao","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective To build a reference fetal growth chart for the Chinese population based on fetal ultrasound measurements. Methods This was a multicenter, population-based retrospective cohort study. Longitudinal ultrasound measurement data were collected from 24 hospitals in 18 provinces of China from 1st September through 31st October of 2019. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated based on head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length using Hadlock formula 3. Fetal growth curves were estimated using a two-level linear regression model with cubic splines. All participants were divided into two groups: the northern group (n = 5829) and the southern group (n = 3246) based on the geographical division of China and male fetus group (n = 4775) and female fetus group (n = 4300) based on fetal gender. The EFW was compared by fetal gender and geographical group. All statistical models were adjusted for maternal sociodemographic characteristics. Results A total of 9075 participants with 31,700 ultrasound measurement records were included in this study. Male fetuses demonstrated significantly larger EFW compared to female ones starting at 16 weeks of gestation and extending to delivery (global test P < 0.01). The overall geographic difference in EFW was significant (global test P = 0.03), and week-specific comparisons showed that the northern group had a greater EFW starting at 15 weeks of gestation and extending to 29 weeks of gestation, although this difference did not extend to the time of delivery. The Z-score of EFW confirmed that our Chinese fetal growth charts differed from previously published standards. Conclusion This study provides EFW and ultrasound biometric reference measurements for Chinese fetuses and reveals differences from other fetal growth charts. The chart is worth promoting in more regions of China but should be tested prudently before use.","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese Fetal Growth: A Multicenter Cohort Study Based on Fetal Ultrasound Measurements\",\"authors\":\"X. Gong, Tianchen Wu, Xiaoli Wang, Lizhen Zhang, Yiping You, Hongwei Wei, Xifang Zuo, Ying Zhou, Xinli Xing, Zhaoyan Meng, Q. Lyu, ZhaoDong Liu, Jian Zhang, Liyan Hu, Junnan Li, Li Li, Chulin Chen, Chunyan Liu, Guoqiang Sun, Aiju Liu, Jingsi Chen, Y. Lyu, Yuan Wei, Yangyu Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective To build a reference fetal growth chart for the Chinese population based on fetal ultrasound measurements. Methods This was a multicenter, population-based retrospective cohort study. Longitudinal ultrasound measurement data were collected from 24 hospitals in 18 provinces of China from 1st September through 31st October of 2019. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated based on head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length using Hadlock formula 3. Fetal growth curves were estimated using a two-level linear regression model with cubic splines. All participants were divided into two groups: the northern group (n = 5829) and the southern group (n = 3246) based on the geographical division of China and male fetus group (n = 4775) and female fetus group (n = 4300) based on fetal gender. The EFW was compared by fetal gender and geographical group. All statistical models were adjusted for maternal sociodemographic characteristics. Results A total of 9075 participants with 31,700 ultrasound measurement records were included in this study. Male fetuses demonstrated significantly larger EFW compared to female ones starting at 16 weeks of gestation and extending to delivery (global test P < 0.01). The overall geographic difference in EFW was significant (global test P = 0.03), and week-specific comparisons showed that the northern group had a greater EFW starting at 15 weeks of gestation and extending to 29 weeks of gestation, although this difference did not extend to the time of delivery. The Z-score of EFW confirmed that our Chinese fetal growth charts differed from previously published standards. Conclusion This study provides EFW and ultrasound biometric reference measurements for Chinese fetuses and reveals differences from other fetal growth charts. The chart is worth promoting in more regions of China but should be tested prudently before use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】目的基于胎儿超声测量,建立适用于中国人群的参考胎儿生长图。方法本研究是一项多中心、以人群为基础的回顾性队列研究。纵向超声测量数据收集自2019年9月1日至10月31日,来自中国18个省份的24家医院。根据头围、腹围和股骨长度,采用Hadlock公式3计算胎儿体重。采用三次样条双水平线性回归模型估计胎儿生长曲线。所有参与者根据中国的地理划分和胎儿性别分为北方组(n = 5829)和南方组(n = 3246),男性胎儿组(n = 4775)和女性胎儿组(n = 4300)。按胎儿性别和地域分组比较EFW。所有统计模型都根据产妇的社会人口学特征进行了调整。结果共纳入受试者9075人,超声测量记录31700份。从妊娠16周开始至分娩时,男性胎儿的EFW显著高于女性胎儿(全检P < 0.01)。EFW的总体地理差异是显著的(全球检验P = 0.03),周特异性比较显示,北方组的EFW在妊娠15周开始并延伸到妊娠29周,尽管这种差异没有延伸到分娩时间。EFW的Z-score证实了我们的中国胎儿生长图表与先前公布的标准不同。结论本研究为中国胎儿提供了EFW和超声生物特征参考指标,揭示了与其他胎儿生长指标的差异。该图表值得在中国更多地区推广,但在使用前应谨慎测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chinese Fetal Growth: A Multicenter Cohort Study Based on Fetal Ultrasound Measurements
Abstract Objective To build a reference fetal growth chart for the Chinese population based on fetal ultrasound measurements. Methods This was a multicenter, population-based retrospective cohort study. Longitudinal ultrasound measurement data were collected from 24 hospitals in 18 provinces of China from 1st September through 31st October of 2019. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated based on head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length using Hadlock formula 3. Fetal growth curves were estimated using a two-level linear regression model with cubic splines. All participants were divided into two groups: the northern group (n = 5829) and the southern group (n = 3246) based on the geographical division of China and male fetus group (n = 4775) and female fetus group (n = 4300) based on fetal gender. The EFW was compared by fetal gender and geographical group. All statistical models were adjusted for maternal sociodemographic characteristics. Results A total of 9075 participants with 31,700 ultrasound measurement records were included in this study. Male fetuses demonstrated significantly larger EFW compared to female ones starting at 16 weeks of gestation and extending to delivery (global test P < 0.01). The overall geographic difference in EFW was significant (global test P = 0.03), and week-specific comparisons showed that the northern group had a greater EFW starting at 15 weeks of gestation and extending to 29 weeks of gestation, although this difference did not extend to the time of delivery. The Z-score of EFW confirmed that our Chinese fetal growth charts differed from previously published standards. Conclusion This study provides EFW and ultrasound biometric reference measurements for Chinese fetuses and reveals differences from other fetal growth charts. The chart is worth promoting in more regions of China but should be tested prudently before use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信