自我导向发展的预测因素和结果:对个人和情境因素的调查

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Muhammad Qamar Zia, M. Naveed, Asif Iqbal, Shagufta Ghauri
{"title":"自我导向发展的预测因素和结果:对个人和情境因素的调查","authors":"Muhammad Qamar Zia, M. Naveed, Asif Iqbal, Shagufta Ghauri","doi":"10.1080/14480220.2021.1991834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Confronted with the rapid technological changes and increased global competition, training of employees now focused on self-directed development (SDD). Despite the recognition of self-directed development, only few empirical studies have investigated the combined relationship of both predictors and outcomes simultaneously. This research attempted to develop and test a conceptual model of SDD, which includes both individual and contextual factors as predictors and outcomes, following an input–process–output perspective. The model was validated through SEM analysis from a sample of 383 working business students. In general, results indicate that SDD is a mix of both individual and contextual factors that lead to positive outcomes. The findings offer new insights into the way organizations can improve employee development through SDD. However, unexpected findings were also noted. Job autonomy has an insignificant relationship, whereas empowerment and proactive personality were weakly associated with SDD.","PeriodicalId":56351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors and outcomes of self-directed development: an investigation of individual and contextual factors\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Qamar Zia, M. Naveed, Asif Iqbal, Shagufta Ghauri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14480220.2021.1991834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Confronted with the rapid technological changes and increased global competition, training of employees now focused on self-directed development (SDD). Despite the recognition of self-directed development, only few empirical studies have investigated the combined relationship of both predictors and outcomes simultaneously. This research attempted to develop and test a conceptual model of SDD, which includes both individual and contextual factors as predictors and outcomes, following an input–process–output perspective. The model was validated through SEM analysis from a sample of 383 working business students. In general, results indicate that SDD is a mix of both individual and contextual factors that lead to positive outcomes. The findings offer new insights into the way organizations can improve employee development through SDD. However, unexpected findings were also noted. Job autonomy has an insignificant relationship, whereas empowerment and proactive personality were weakly associated with SDD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Training Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Training Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1991834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1991834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要面对快速的技术变革和日益激烈的全球竞争,员工培训现在侧重于自主发展(SDD)。尽管人们承认自主发展,但只有少数实证研究同时调查了预测因素和结果的综合关系。本研究试图开发和测试SDD的概念模型,该模型包括个人和情境因素作为预测因素和结果,遵循输入-过程-输出的观点。该模型通过383名在职商科学生的SEM分析进行了验证。总体而言,研究结果表明,SDD是导致积极结果的个人因素和情境因素的混合。这些发现为组织如何通过SDD改善员工发展提供了新的见解。然而,也注意到了意想不到的发现。工作自主性与SDD的关系不显著,而授权和积极主动的个性与SDD的相关性较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors and outcomes of self-directed development: an investigation of individual and contextual factors
ABSTRACT Confronted with the rapid technological changes and increased global competition, training of employees now focused on self-directed development (SDD). Despite the recognition of self-directed development, only few empirical studies have investigated the combined relationship of both predictors and outcomes simultaneously. This research attempted to develop and test a conceptual model of SDD, which includes both individual and contextual factors as predictors and outcomes, following an input–process–output perspective. The model was validated through SEM analysis from a sample of 383 working business students. In general, results indicate that SDD is a mix of both individual and contextual factors that lead to positive outcomes. The findings offer new insights into the way organizations can improve employee development through SDD. However, unexpected findings were also noted. Job autonomy has an insignificant relationship, whereas empowerment and proactive personality were weakly associated with SDD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Training Research
International Journal of Training Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信