“班图斯坦州”

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
A. Lissoni, Shireen Ally
{"title":"“班图斯坦州”","authors":"A. Lissoni, Shireen Ally","doi":"10.1080/17532523.2019.1596405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1951, South Africa’s apartheid state passed the Bantu Authorities Act that parcelled the entire population of black Africans into ten ethnically defined selfgoverning “homelands” or bantustans, four of which were eventually given so-called “independence.” Presented by Pretoria as a form of black self-determination, they were rejected by the liberation movement and its supporters as a political fraud: reservoirs of cheap African labour ruled by “puppet” governments, often consisting of illegitimately installed chiefs (and white civil servants on secondment from Pretoria), governed by tribal custom and coercive force. Bantustanisation was, of course, an historical failure.","PeriodicalId":41857,"journal":{"name":"African Historical Review","volume":"50 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17532523.2019.1596405","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Bantustan States”\",\"authors\":\"A. Lissoni, Shireen Ally\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17532523.2019.1596405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1951, South Africa’s apartheid state passed the Bantu Authorities Act that parcelled the entire population of black Africans into ten ethnically defined selfgoverning “homelands” or bantustans, four of which were eventually given so-called “independence.” Presented by Pretoria as a form of black self-determination, they were rejected by the liberation movement and its supporters as a political fraud: reservoirs of cheap African labour ruled by “puppet” governments, often consisting of illegitimately installed chiefs (and white civil servants on secondment from Pretoria), governed by tribal custom and coercive force. Bantustanisation was, of course, an historical failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Historical Review\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17532523.2019.1596405\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17532523.2019.1596405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17532523.2019.1596405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

1951年,南非种族隔离国家通过了《班图当局法》,将整个非洲黑人人口划分为十个种族定义的自治“家园”或班图斯坦,其中四个最终被赋予所谓的“独立”,他们被解放运动及其支持者视为政治骗局而拒绝:由“傀儡”政府统治的廉价非洲劳动力库,通常由非法任命的酋长(以及从比勒陀利亚借调的白人公务员)组成,由部落习俗和强制力统治。当然,班图斯坦化是历史上的失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Bantustan States”
In 1951, South Africa’s apartheid state passed the Bantu Authorities Act that parcelled the entire population of black Africans into ten ethnically defined selfgoverning “homelands” or bantustans, four of which were eventually given so-called “independence.” Presented by Pretoria as a form of black self-determination, they were rejected by the liberation movement and its supporters as a political fraud: reservoirs of cheap African labour ruled by “puppet” governments, often consisting of illegitimately installed chiefs (and white civil servants on secondment from Pretoria), governed by tribal custom and coercive force. Bantustanisation was, of course, an historical failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信