流亡知识分子的骗子:对被认为不公正的暗中反对

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
C. Svensson
{"title":"流亡知识分子的骗子:对被认为不公正的暗中反对","authors":"C. Svensson","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4315342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, governments are persecuting intellectuals in their home countries. Em-ploying data from ethnographic fieldwork, the present paper has a focus on exiled scholars, artists, and writers hosted in the Nordic countries. Living in exile enables the interlocutors to criticise the regimes’ perceived injustice, and to accuse them of limiting freedom of expression and human rights. In return, the exiled intellectuals are regarded as a threat, and they are personally persecuted in the form of torture, “ideological re-education”, imprisonment, execution or “disappearance”. Embedded in their opposition is a belief that cultural forms can change, and the equivocal nature of the trickster figure symbolises the interlocutors’ defiance of the perceived homogeneity. Applying trickster analytically provides an opportunity for illumi-nating normative common-senseness, which can reveal potentials for the cultural transformation of static cultures and identities. The interlocutors’ opposition takes shape by using a diversity of creativity and innovative constellations, which shows that power structures can be contested and that social conditions can be shaped by agency.","PeriodicalId":43997,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Notebooks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The trickster of exiled intellectuals: Arcane opposition to the perceived injustice\",\"authors\":\"C. Svensson\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.4315342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Globally, governments are persecuting intellectuals in their home countries. Em-ploying data from ethnographic fieldwork, the present paper has a focus on exiled scholars, artists, and writers hosted in the Nordic countries. Living in exile enables the interlocutors to criticise the regimes’ perceived injustice, and to accuse them of limiting freedom of expression and human rights. In return, the exiled intellectuals are regarded as a threat, and they are personally persecuted in the form of torture, “ideological re-education”, imprisonment, execution or “disappearance”. Embedded in their opposition is a belief that cultural forms can change, and the equivocal nature of the trickster figure symbolises the interlocutors’ defiance of the perceived homogeneity. Applying trickster analytically provides an opportunity for illumi-nating normative common-senseness, which can reveal potentials for the cultural transformation of static cultures and identities. The interlocutors’ opposition takes shape by using a diversity of creativity and innovative constellations, which shows that power structures can be contested and that social conditions can be shaped by agency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Notebooks\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Notebooks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4315342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Notebooks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4315342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,政府正在迫害本国的知识分子。本文利用人种学领域的数据,重点关注北欧国家的流亡学者、艺术家和作家。流亡生活使对话者能够批评政权所认为的不公正,并指责他们限制言论自由和人权。作为回报,流亡知识分子被视为威胁,他们受到酷刑、“思想再教育”、监禁、处决或“失踪”等形式的个人迫害。他们的反对意见中包含了一种信念,即文化形式可以改变,而骗子形象的模棱两可象征着对话者对所感知的同质性的理解。通过对trickster的分析,可以揭示静态文化和身份的文化转换潜力,从而为规范常识的消解提供机会。对话者的反对意见是通过使用多样的创造力和创新星座形成的,这表明权力结构可以受到质疑,社会条件可以由代理决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The trickster of exiled intellectuals: Arcane opposition to the perceived injustice
Globally, governments are persecuting intellectuals in their home countries. Em-ploying data from ethnographic fieldwork, the present paper has a focus on exiled scholars, artists, and writers hosted in the Nordic countries. Living in exile enables the interlocutors to criticise the regimes’ perceived injustice, and to accuse them of limiting freedom of expression and human rights. In return, the exiled intellectuals are regarded as a threat, and they are personally persecuted in the form of torture, “ideological re-education”, imprisonment, execution or “disappearance”. Embedded in their opposition is a belief that cultural forms can change, and the equivocal nature of the trickster figure symbolises the interlocutors’ defiance of the perceived homogeneity. Applying trickster analytically provides an opportunity for illumi-nating normative common-senseness, which can reveal potentials for the cultural transformation of static cultures and identities. The interlocutors’ opposition takes shape by using a diversity of creativity and innovative constellations, which shows that power structures can be contested and that social conditions can be shaped by agency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信