资优教育研究的色彩:选刊20年内容分析

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Cristina Worley, Jemimah L. Young
{"title":"资优教育研究的色彩:选刊20年内容分析","authors":"Cristina Worley, Jemimah L. Young","doi":"10.1080/02783193.2023.2172752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This content analysis focuses on content from four major gifted journals (i.e., Gifted Child Quarterly, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, Journal of Advanced Academics, and Roeper Review). After applying a priori search and inclusion protocols, a final sample (N = 202) of articles examining Black and Brown students in gifted education were retained. The trends in gifted education research centered on Black and Brown students can be placed into three broad categories: (a) representation, (b) methodology, and (c) focus on National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) standards. The researchers provide implications for equitable gifted education praxis, which include filling the gaps in research on Black and Brown gifted students and methodological considerations.","PeriodicalId":46979,"journal":{"name":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Color of Gifted Education Research: A 20-Year Content Analysis of Selected Journals\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Worley, Jemimah L. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02783193.2023.2172752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This content analysis focuses on content from four major gifted journals (i.e., Gifted Child Quarterly, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, Journal of Advanced Academics, and Roeper Review). After applying a priori search and inclusion protocols, a final sample (N = 202) of articles examining Black and Brown students in gifted education were retained. The trends in gifted education research centered on Black and Brown students can be placed into three broad categories: (a) representation, (b) methodology, and (c) focus on National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) standards. The researchers provide implications for equitable gifted education praxis, which include filling the gaps in research on Black and Brown gifted students and methodological considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2023.2172752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2023.2172752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本内容分析主要关注四大天才期刊(即《天才儿童季刊》、《天才教育期刊》、《高等学术期刊》和《Roeper评论》)的内容。在应用先验搜索和纳入协议后,保留了研究天才教育中黑人和棕色人种学生的文章的最终样本(N=202)。以黑人和棕色人种学生为中心的天才教育研究趋势可以分为三大类:(a)代表性,(b)方法论,以及(c)关注全国天才儿童协会(NAGC)标准。研究人员为公平的天才教育实践提供了启示,其中包括填补黑人和棕色人种天才学生研究的空白和方法上的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Color of Gifted Education Research: A 20-Year Content Analysis of Selected Journals
ABSTRACT This content analysis focuses on content from four major gifted journals (i.e., Gifted Child Quarterly, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, Journal of Advanced Academics, and Roeper Review). After applying a priori search and inclusion protocols, a final sample (N = 202) of articles examining Black and Brown students in gifted education were retained. The trends in gifted education research centered on Black and Brown students can be placed into three broad categories: (a) representation, (b) methodology, and (c) focus on National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) standards. The researchers provide implications for equitable gifted education praxis, which include filling the gaps in research on Black and Brown gifted students and methodological considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信