临床性学临床推理的共识声明

Shea Graham
{"title":"临床性学临床推理的共识声明","authors":"Shea Graham","doi":"10.1353/bsr.2023.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This Delphi study was conducted to develop a consensus statement on clinical reasoning in clinical sexology. 10 participants completed the qualitative interviews. The analysis identified 11 principles that provide a framework for sex therapists to better understand clinical reasoning. These principles were grouped into three domains: 1) client empowerment, 2) self-reflection, and 3) evidence-based inquiry. These three domains reflect the factors that shape sexology-informed clinical reasoning: the patient, the therapist's experience, and evidence-based information.","PeriodicalId":73626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of black sexuality and relationships","volume":"9 1","pages":"301 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Consensus Statement on Clinical Reasoning in Clinical Sexology\",\"authors\":\"Shea Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/bsr.2023.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This Delphi study was conducted to develop a consensus statement on clinical reasoning in clinical sexology. 10 participants completed the qualitative interviews. The analysis identified 11 principles that provide a framework for sex therapists to better understand clinical reasoning. These principles were grouped into three domains: 1) client empowerment, 2) self-reflection, and 3) evidence-based inquiry. These three domains reflect the factors that shape sexology-informed clinical reasoning: the patient, the therapist's experience, and evidence-based information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of black sexuality and relationships\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"301 - 326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of black sexuality and relationships\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/bsr.2023.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of black sexuality and relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bsr.2023.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本德尔菲研究旨在就临床性学中的临床推理达成共识。10名参与者完成了定性访谈。该分析确定了11条原则,为性治疗师更好地理解临床推理提供了框架。这些原则分为三个领域:1)客户授权,2)自我反思,3)循证调查。这三个领域反映了影响性学知情临床推理的因素:患者、治疗师的经验和循证信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Consensus Statement on Clinical Reasoning in Clinical Sexology
Abstract:This Delphi study was conducted to develop a consensus statement on clinical reasoning in clinical sexology. 10 participants completed the qualitative interviews. The analysis identified 11 principles that provide a framework for sex therapists to better understand clinical reasoning. These principles were grouped into three domains: 1) client empowerment, 2) self-reflection, and 3) evidence-based inquiry. These three domains reflect the factors that shape sexology-informed clinical reasoning: the patient, the therapist's experience, and evidence-based information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信